Decision Support for International Agreements Regulating Nanomaterials
- 155 Downloads
Nanomaterials are handled in global value chains for many different products, albeit not always recognisable as nanoproducts. The global market for nanomaterials faces an uncertain future, as the international dialogue on regulating nanomaterials is still ongoing and risk assessment data are being collected. At the same time, regulators and civil society organisations complain about a lack of transparency about the presence of nanomaterials on the market. In the project on Sustainable Nanotechnologies (SUN, www.sun-fp7.eu ), a Decision Support System (SUNDS) has been developed, primarily for confidential use by risk and sustainability managers inside a company or consortium. In this article, we formulate a scenario concerning a potential role for an open access decision support system in negotiations on international agreements regulating trade in nanomaterials. The scenario includes design rules for decision support systems as well as procedures for use of such a system in stakeholder dialogue and policy-making on governance of these and other emerging technologies. This article incorporates analysis of results of stakeholder engagement on nanomaterials as well as literature and internet sources suggested by these stakeholders.
KeywordsNanomaterials Decision support Sustainable development Nanosafety Global governance
We gratefully acknowledge the contributions of the participants during the stakeholder workshop analysed here, and constructive comments by three anonymous reviewers.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflicts of Interest
The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme [FP7/2007–2013] under EC-GA No. 604305 ‘SUN’. This publication reflects the views only of the authors, and the European Commission cannot be held responsible for any use, which may be made of the information contained therein.
Human Participants and/or Animals, and Informed Consent
The research has not involved animals. The participants in the workshop have been asked to give their informed consent to publication of results in anonymised form, and have been given the chance to comment on the draft summary report in the annex before publication.
- 1.McLeod R, Schell GP (2007) Management information systems, 10th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
- 8.van Harmelen T, Zondervan-van den Beuken EK, Brouwer DH, Kuijpers E, Fransman W, Buist HB, Ligthart TN, Hincapie I, Hischier R, Linkov I, Nowack B, Studer J, Hilty L, Som C (2016) LICARA nanoSCAN - a tool for the self-assessment of benefits and risks of nanoproducts. Environ Int 91:150–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Subramanian V, Semenzin E, Hristozov D, Zabeo A, Malsch I, McAlea E, Murphy F, Mullins M, van Harmelen T, Ligthart T, Linkov I, Marcomini A (2016) Sustainable nanotechnology decision support system: bridging risk management, sustainable innovation and risk governance. J Nanopart Res 18:89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-016-3375-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Som C, Zondervan-van den Beuken E, Van Harmelen T, Güttinger J, Bodmer M, Brouwer D, Buist HE, Carroll R, Coll C, Fransman W, Hartmanis A, Hincapie I, Hischier R, Karachalios T, Kouravelou K, Kuijpers E, Ligthart T, Notter D, Nowack B, Seibold U, Schneider G (2014) LICARA guidelines for the sustainable competitiveness of nanoproducts. Dübendorf, St. Gallen, ZeistGoogle Scholar
- 11.TŰV SŰD Industrie Service (2013) Certification Standard CENARIOS™. Available at http://www.tuevsued.de/uploads/images/1219824286015340810363/CENARIOS_Zertifiziergrundlage_e.pdf
- 12.Widler T, Meili C, Semenzin E, Subramanian V, Zabeo A, Hristozov D, Marcomini A (2016) Organisational risk management of nanomaterials using SUNDS: the contribution of CENARIOS™. In: Murphy F, McAlea E, Mullins M (eds) Managing risk in nanotechnology. Topics in governance, assurance and transfer. Springer International Publishing Switzerland, pp 2-19-235Google Scholar
- 13.Subramanian V, Semenzin E, Hristozov D, Zabeo Z, Malsch I, Saling P, van Harmelen T, Ligthart T, Marcomini A (2016) Integrating the social impacts into risk governance of nanotechnology. In: Murphy F, McAlea E, Mullins M (eds) Managing risk in nanotechnology. Topics in governance, assurance and transfer. Springer International Publishing Switzerland, pp 51–70Google Scholar
- 14.Subramanian V, Semenzin E, Zabeo A, Sailing P, Ligthart T, van Harmelen T, Malsch I, Hristozov D, Marcomini A (2018) Assessing the social impacts of nano-enabled products through the life cycle: the case of nano-enabled anti-microbial paint.. Int J Life Cycle Assess. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1324-9
- 15.Malsch I, Subramanian V, Semenzin E, Hristozov D, Marcomini A (2014) Collective decision making on risk management and sustainable manufacturing of nanomaterials and the role of decision support tools. In Proceedings 5th STS Italia conference a matter of design: making society through science and technology. Milan, http://www.stsitalia.org/?p=1548&lang=en; pp 12–14
- 17.Malsch I, Subramanian V, Semenzin E, Zabeo A, Hristozov D, Mullins M, Murphy F, Linkov I, Marcomini A (2017) Comparing mental models of prospective users of the sustainable nanotechnology decision support system. Environ Syst Dec 37(4):465–483Google Scholar
- 19.Widmer M, Meili C, Mantovani E, Porcari A (2010) The FramingNano Governance Platform: a new integrated approach to the responsible development of nanotechnologies, http://cordis.europa.eu/project/rcn/89673_en.html
- 20.Jasanoff S (ed) (2011) Reframing rights. Bioconstitutionalism in the genetic age. MIT Press, Cambridge/MAGoogle Scholar
- 21.European Commission (2016) Handbook for trade sustainability impact assessment, 2nd edn. European Commission, Brussels http://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/policy-making/analysis/sustainability-impactassessments/ Google Scholar
- 22.Development Solutions (2016) Trade sustainability impact assessment on the environmental goods agreement. Final Report. European Commission, Brussels http://www.egatradesia.com/
- 24.Klaessig FG (2014) Developing official practices for nanoEHS data compilation, curation and compliance. In: Coenen C, Dijkstra A, Fautz C, Guivant J, Konrad K, Milburn C, van Lente H (eds) Innovation and responsibility: engaging with new and emerging technologies, S.NET 005. IOS Press and AKA, Heidelberg, pp 121–133Google Scholar
- 25.SAICM (2015) Emerging policy issue update on nanotechnologies and manufactured nanomaterials. International Conference on Chemicals Management, 4th session, Geneva, 28 September–2 October 2015, Item 5 (b) (iii) d of the provisional agenda, http://www.saicm.org/
- 26.Kica E, Wessels RA (2017) Transnational arrangements in the governance of emerging technologies: the case of nanotechnologies. In: Bowman D, Stokes E, Rip A (eds) Embedding new technologies into society. A regulatory, ethical and societal perspective. Pan Stanford, Singapore, pp 219–258Google Scholar