Futures Perfect and Visioneering: a Re-Assessment


In this essay, I review the concept of visioneering as I developed it and consider the ways in which other scholars have deployed it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. 1.

    A sister center was also funded at Arizona State University. The UCSB effort was initially proposed by myself along with Rich Appelbaum (global studies), Bruce Bimber (political science), Fiona Goodchild (science education), Barbara Herr Harthorn (anthropology), Evelyn Hu (engineering), and Chris Newfield (English).

  2. 2.

    Los Angeles, for example, has “Silicon Beach” and Manhattan proclaims to be fostering “Silicon Alley.” For the value of public sector investment, see [11].


  1. 1.

    Brown N et al. (2000) Contested futures: a sociology of prospective techno-science. Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Jasanoff S, Kim S-H (eds) (2015) Dreamscapes of modernity: sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    McCray WP (2013) The Visioneers: how a group of elite scientists pursued space colonies, nanotechnologies, and a limitless future. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Dickel S, Schrape J-F (2017) The logic of digital utopianism. NanoEthics 11(1):47–58

  5. 5.

    Gudowsky N, Sotoudeh M (2017) Into blue skies—a transdisciplinary foresight and co-creation method for adding robustness to visioneering. NanoEthics 11(1):93–106

  6. 6.

    Engels F, Münch AV, Simon D (2017) One site—multiple visions: visioneering between contrasting actors’ perspectives. NanoEthics 11(1):59–74

  7. 7.

    Ferrari A, Lösch A (2017) How smart grid meets in vitro meat: on visions as socio-epistemic practices. NanoEthics 11(1):75–91

  8. 8.

    Pfeiffer S (2017) The vision of “Industrie 4.0” in the making—a case of future told, tamed, and traded. NanoEthics 11(1):107–121

  9. 9.

    Barbrook R, Cameron A (1996) The Californian ideology. Sci Cult 6(6):44–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Lécuyer C (2006) Making Silicon Valley: innovation and the growth of high tech, 1930–1970. The MIT Press, Cambridge/MA

  11. 11.

    Mazzucato M (2011) The entrepreneurial state: debunking public vs. private sector myths. Anthem, New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Osnos E (2017) The survival of the richest. The New Yorker 30:36–45

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to William Patrick McCray.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McCray, W.P. Futures Perfect and Visioneering: a Re-Assessment. Nanoethics 11, 203–207 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-017-0303-8

Download citation


  • Visioneer
  • Visioneering