, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 85–87 | Cite as

Shaping Emerging Technologies: Governance, Innovation, Discourse

Edited by Kornelia Konrad, Christopher Coenen, Anne Dijkstra, Colin Milburn and Harro van Lente, 2013. (IOS Press / AKA, Berlin), ISBN:978-1-61499-300-1, 248 p.
  • Elizabeth A. PittsEmail author
Book Review

This edited collection presents a selection of papers from the 2012 conference of the Society for the Study of Nanoscience and Emerging Technologies (S.NET), an international network of scholars and practitioners who seek to understand and influence the relationships between technologies and socio-economic contexts. Like S.NET itself, the collection is heterogeneous: organized under the headings of Engagements, Regulatory Governance, Innovation, and Discourse, its sixteen chapters reflect a broad range of political, epistemological, and methodological standpoints. Thus, unlike many other conference publications, this one speaks to no single disciplinary audience. Researchers interested in emerging technologies will likely find at least one chapter that resonates with their own approach, plus a host of other perspectives, some of which may challenge their views about how and why such research should be undertaken in the first place. This plurality will be familiar to readers of NanoEthics...


  1. 1.
    Ferrari A (2010) Developments in the debate on nanoethics: traditional approaches and the need for new kinds of analysis. NanoEthics 4(1):27–52. doi: 10.1007/s11569-009-0081-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gorman ME, Werhane PH, Swami N (2009) Moral imagination, trading zones, and the role of the ethicist in nanotechnology. NanoEthics 3(3):185–195. doi: 10.1007/s11569-009-0069-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Grunwald A (2010) From speculative nanoethics to explorative philosophy of nanotechnology. NanoEthics 4(2):91–101. doi: 10.1007/s11569-010-0088-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Johnson DG (2007) Ethics and technology “in the making”: an essay on the challenge of nanoethics. NanoEthics 1(1):21–30. doi: 10.1007/s11569-007-0006-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nordmann A (2007) If and then: a critique of speculative nanoethics. NanoEthics 1(1):31–46. doi: 10.1007/s11569-007-0007-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Reichow A, Dorbeck-Jung B (2013) Discovering specific conditions for compliance with soft regulation related to work with nanomaterials. NanoEthics 7(1):83–92. doi: 10.1007/s11569-013-0165-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rip A, van Lente H (2013) Bridging the gap between innovation and ELSA: the TA program in the Dutch Nano-R&D Program NanoNed. NanoEthics 7(1):7–16. doi: 10.1007/s11569-013-0171-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Roache R (2008) Ethics, speculation, and values. NanoEthics 2(3):317–327. doi: 10.1007/s11569-008-0050-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ruggiu D (2013) Temporal perspectives of the nanotechnological challenge to regulation: how human rights can contribute to the present and future of nanotechnologies. NanoEthics 7(3):201–215. doi: 10.1007/s11569-013-0184-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ruivenkamp M, Rip A (2011) Entanglement of imaging and imagining of nanotechnology. NanoEthics 5(2):185–193. doi: 10.1007/s11569-011-0122-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Seifert F, Plows A (2014) From anti-biotech to nano-watch: early risers and spin-off campaigners in Germany, the UK and internationally. NanoEthics 8(1):73–89. doi: 10.1007/s11569-014-0189-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Swierstra T, Rip A (2007) Nano-ethics as NEST-ethics: patterns of moral argumentation about new and emerging science and technology. NanoEthics 1(1):3–20. doi: 10.1007/s11569-007-0005-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.North Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA

Personalised recommendations