Abstract
This paper explores the application of an affective content analysis to a selection of nanotechnology news articles gathered from selected newspapers. Thematic content analyses dominate current efforts to mine large text collections of popular science media; the addition of an affective analysis element can yield useful information to supplement future content analysis efforts. Using Whissell’s Dictionary of Affect in Language, the analysis rates news articles gathered over a twenty-two year period for their pleasantness, activeness, and imagery, determining the mean affective tone in each category for the entire collection, four ‘content themes’ (business, national security, health, and environment), and the change in affective tone over the twenty-two year period these articles represent. Whereas the entire collection analyzed as a whole rates very similarly to the average found for everyday English language use and the ‘content themes’ show similar results, the change in affective tone over the years has been both significant and striking. A sample of results from three years of the twenty-two year period is then qualitatively explored to demonstrate to the reader the connection between the quantitative results of the Dictionary and the qualitative effect of the article’s word use and phrasing. The paper ends with a review of the technique’s success, implications for policymaking and public dialogue, and avenues for future use.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
PEN, The Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies. http://www.nanotechproject.org/inventories/consumer/. Accessed October 5, 2010. There has been some disagreement with this figure, though, and the actual number may be lower—see Berube, David; Searson, Eileen, Morton, Timothy; Cummings, Christopher (2010). Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies—Consumer Product Inventory Evaluated. Nanotechnology Law & Business 152(7): 152–163.
Interestingly, the word ‘academic’ rates at 1.8, 1.5, and 2.6. I will allow the reader to come to their own conclusions.
References
Allan S, Anderson A, Petersen A (2010) Framing risk: nanotechnologies in the news. J Risk Res 13(1):29–44
Anderson A, Allan S, Petersen A, Wilkinson C (2005) The framing of nanotechnologies in the British Press. Sci Commun 27(2):200–220
Anderson A, Petersen A, Wilkinson C, Allan S (2009) Nanotechnology, risk and communication. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills
Blackford J, Buckholtz J, Avery S, Zald D (2010) A unique role for the human amygdale in novelty detection. Neuroimage 50(3):1188–1193
Barrett LF (2006) Solving the emotion paradox: categorization and the experience of emotion. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 10(1):20–46
Bower G (1981) Mood and memory. Am Psychol 36(2):129–148
Brunet P, Schmidt L (2008) Are shy adults really bolder online? It depends on the context. Cyberpsychol Behav 11(6):707–709
Brunet P, Schmidt L (2009) Sex differences in the expression and use of computer-mediated affective lanugage: does context matter? Soc Sci Comput Rev 28(2):194–205
Bush G, Luu P, Posner M (2000) Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulated cortex. Trends Cogn Sci 4(6):215–222
Chong D, Druckman J (2007) Framing public opinion in competitive democracies. Am Polit Sci Rev 101(4):637–655
Druckman J (2001) On the limits of framing effects: who can frame? J Polit 63(4):1041–1066
Druckman J, McDermott R (2008) Emotion and the framing of risky choice. Polit Behav 30:297–321
Dudo A, Choi D-H, Scheufele D (2011) Food nanotechnology in the news: coverage patterns and thematic emphases during the last decade. Appetite 56:78–89
Dudo A, Dunwoody S, Scheufele DA (2011) The emergence of nano news: Tracking thematic trends and changes in U.S. newspaper coverge of nanotechnology. Journalism Mass Comm Q 88(1):55–75
Ebeling M (2008) Mediating uncertainty: communicating the financial risks of nanotechnologies. Sci Commun 29(3):335–361
Frewen P, Dozois D, Neufeld R, Densmore M, Stevens T, Lanius R (2010) Neuroimaging social emotional processing in women: fMRI study of script-driven imagery. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 6(3):1–18
Gamson W, Modigliani A (1989) Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: a constructionist approach. Am J Sociol 95(1):1–37
Gamson W (1992) Talking politics. Cambridge University Press, New York
Gross K, D’Ambrosio L (2004) Framing emotional response. Polit Psychol 25(1):1–29
Gross K, Brewer P (2007) Sore losers: news frames, policy debates, and emotions. Harv Int J Press/Polit 12(1):122–133
Gross K (2008) Framing persuasive appeals: episodic and thematic framing, emotional response, and policy opinion. Polit Psychol 29(2):169–192
Hirschberg J, Benus S, Brenier J, Enos F, Friedman S, Gilman S, Girand C, Graciarena M, Kathol A, Michaelis L, Pellom B, Shriberg E, Stolcke A (2005) Distinguishing Deceptive from Non-Deceptive Speech. Proceedings of Interspeech 2005 – Eurospeech. J Risk Res 13(1):29–44
Iyengar S (1991) Is anyone responsible? University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Kahan DM, Slovic P, Braman D, Gastil J, Cohen G (2007) Nanotechnology risk perceptions: the influence of affect and values. Cultural Cognition Project at Yale Law School and the Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies.
Kahan D, Braman D, Slovic P, Gastil J, Cohen G (2009) Cultural cognition of the risks and benefits of nanotechnology. Nat Nanotechnol 4(2):87–90
Kjolberg K (2009) Representations of nanotechnology in Norwegian newspapers—implications for public participation. Nanoethics 3:61–72
Marcus G, Neuman WR, Mackuen M (2000) Affective intelligence and political judgment. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Massey SA, Druin A, Weeks AC (2007) Emotion, response, and recommendation: the role of affect in children’s book reviews in a digital library. In: Nahl D, Bilal D (eds) Information and emotion: the emergent affective paradigm in information behavior research and theory. Medford, Information Today, pp 135–160
McCombs M (2004) E. Setting the agenda: mass media and public opinion, Blackwell, Malden
McKechnie L, Ross CS (2007) Affective dimensions of information seeking in the context of reading. In: Nahl D, Bilal D (eds) Information and emotion: the emergent affective paradigm in information behavior research and theory. Medford, Information Today, pp 187–195
Nelkin D (1987) Selling science: how the press covers science and technology. W.H. Freeman.
Nelson T, Kinder T (1996) Issue framing and group-centrism in American public opinion. J Polit 58(November):1055–1078
Nelson T, Clawson R, Oxley Z (1997) Media framing of a civil liberties conflict and its effects on tolerance. Am Pol Sci Rev 91(3):567–583
Petersen A, Anderson A, Allan S, Wilkinson C (2008) Opening the black box: scientists’ views on the role of the news media in the nanotechnology debate. Public Underst Sci 18(5):512–530
Posner J, Russell J, Peterson B (2005) The circumplex model of affect: An integrative approach to affective neuroscience, cognitive development, and psychopathology. Dev Psychopathol 17:715–734
Posner J, Russell J, Gerber A, Gorman D, Colibazzi T, Yu S, Wang Z, Kangarlu A, Zhu H, Peterson B (2009) The neurophysiological bases of emtoion: an fMRI study of the affective circumplex using emotion-denoting words. Hum Brain Mapp 30(3):883–895
Ruiter C, Brosschot J (1994) The emotional stroop interference effect in anxiety: attentional bias or cognitive avoidance? Behav Res Ther 32(3):315–319
Russell J (1978) Evidence of convergent validity on the dimensions of affect. J Pers Soc Psychol 36(10):1152–1168
Russell J (2003) Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychol Rev 110(1):145–172
Scheufele DA (1999) Framing as a theory of media effects. J Commun 49(1):103–122
Scheufele DA (2000) Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass Comm Soc 3(2&3):297–316
Scheufele D, Corley E, Shih T, Dalrymple K, Ho S (2008) Religious beliefs and public attitudes toward nanotechnology in Europe and the United States. Nat Nanotechnol 3(4):91–94
Schutz H, Wiedermann P (2008) Framing effects on risk perception of nanotechnology. Public Underst Sci 17(3):369–379
Sergerie K, Armony J, Menear M, Sutton H, Lepage M (2010) Influence of emotional expression on memory recognition bias in schizophrenia as revealed by fMRI. Schizophr Bull 36(4):800–810
Stephens L (2005) News narratives about nano S&T in major U.S. and Non-U.S. newspapers. Sci Commun 27(2):175–199
Tsai J, Miao F, Seppala E (2007) Good feelings in Christianity and Buddhism: religious differences in ideal affect. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 33(3):409–421
Weaver DA, Bimber B (2009) Finding news stories: a comparison on searches using LexisNexis and Google News. Journalism Mass Comm Q 85(3):515–530
Weaver D, Lively E, Bimber B (2009) News media tell the story of technological progress, risk, and regulations. Sci Commun 31(2):139–166
Whissell C (2008) Emotional fluctuations in Bob Dylan’s lyrics measured by the dictionary of affect accompany events and phrases in his life. Psychol Rep 102(2):469–483
Whissell C (2009) Using the revised dictionary of affect in language to quantify the emotional undertones of samples of natural language. Psychol Rep 105:509–521
Whissell C. Whissell’s dictionary of affect in language: technical manual and user’s guide. Retrieved January 20, 2011 from http://www.hdcus.com/manuals/wdalman.pdf.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank Dave Guston for his invaluable advice through all stages of bringing this paper to publication. I would also like to thank Brianne Wells and Chance Chandler for discussions of ideas and reviews of early paper drafts.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Davis, R. A Computer-Aided Affective Content Analysis of Nanotechnology Newspaper Articles. Nanoethics 5, 319–334 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-011-0129-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-011-0129-8