Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (1998). Why states act through formal international organizations. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 42(1), 3–32.
Andonova, Liliana B. (2017). Governance entrepreneurs: International organizations and the rise of global public-private partnerships. Cambridge University Press.
Aronow, P. M., Samii, C., & Assenova, V. A. (2015). Cluster-robust variance estimation for dyadic data. Political Analysis, 23(4), 564–577.
Baccini, Leonardo, & Urpelainen, Johannes. (2014). Cutting the Gordian Knot of economic reform. When and how international institutions help. Oxford University Press.
Bagozzi, B. E. (2015). The multifaceted nature of global climate change negotiations. Review of International Organizations, 10(4), 439–464.
Bailer, S., & Weiler, F. (2015). A political economy of positions in climate change negotiations: Economic, structural, domestic, and strategic explanations. Review of International Organizations, 10(1), 43–66.
Bailey, M. A., Strezhnev, A., & Voeten, E. (2017). Estimating dynamic state preferences from United Nations voting data. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 61(2), 430–456.
Bernstein, S., & Hoffmann, M. (2018). The politics of decarbonization and the catalytic impact of subnational climate experiments. Policy Sciences, 51(2), 189–211.
Betsill, M., Dubash, N., Paterson, M., van Asselt, H., Vihma, A., & Winkler, H. (2015). Building productive links between the UNFCCC and the broader climate governance landscape. Global Environmental Politics, 15(2), 1–10.
Betzold, C., Castro, P., & Weiler, F. (2012). AOSIS in the UNFCCC negotiations: From unity to fragmentation? Climate Policy, 12(5), 591–613.
Bhandary, R. R. (2017). Coalition Strategies in the Climate Negotiations: An analysis of mountain-related coalitions. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 17(2), 173–190.
Blaxekjaer, L. O., & Nielsen, T. D. (2015). Mapping the narrative positions of new political groups under the UNFCCC. Climate Policy, 15(6), 751–766.
Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2003). Latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 993–1022.
Castro, P., Hornlein, L., & Michaelowa, K. (2014). Constructed peer groups and path dependence in international organizations: The case of the international climate change negotiations. Global Environmental Change, 25, 109–120.
Castro, P., & Klock, C. (2021) Coalitions in the Climate Change Negotiations. Routledge chapter Fragmentation in the climate change negotiations.
Castro, P. (2020). National Interests and Coalition Positions on Climate Change: A Text-based Analysis. International Political Science Review Forthcoming.
Colgan, J. (2014). The emperor has no clothes: The limits of OPEC in the global oil market. International Organization, 68(3).
Davis, C. L., & Wilf, M. (2017). Joining the club: Accession to the GATT/WTO. The Journal of Politics, 79(3).
Dreher, A., & Voigt, S. (2011). Does membership in international organizations increase governments’ credibility? A test on the effects of delegating powers. Journal of Comparative Economics, 39(3), 326–348.
Drezner, D. (2009). The power and peril of international regime complexity. Perspectives on Politics, 7(1).
Eckersley, R. (2012). Moving forward in the climate negotiations: Multilateralism or minilateralism? Global Environmental Politics, 12(2), 24–42.
Falkner, R. (2016). A minilateral solution for global climate change? On bargaining efficiency, club benefits, and international legitimacy. Perspectives on Politics, 14(1), 87–101.
Genovese, F. (2014). States’ interests at international climate negotiations: New measures of bargaining positions. Environmental Politics, 23(4), 610–631.
Genovese, F. (2019). Sectors, pollution, and trade: How industrial interests shape domestic positions on global climate agreements. International Studies Quarterly, 63(4), 819–836.
Genovese, F. (2020). Weak States at Global Climate Negotiations. Elements Cambridge University Press.
Gibler, D. M., & Sarkees, M. R. (2004). Measuring alliances: The correlates of war formal interstate alliance dataset, 1816–2000. Journal of Peace Research, 41(2), 211–222.
Gray, J. (2018). Life, death, or zombie? The vitality of international organizations. International Studies Quarterly, 62(1), 1–13.
Green, J. (2013). Rethinking private authority: agents and entrepreneurs in global environmental governance. Princeton University Press.
Grimmer, J., & Stewart, B. M. (2013). Text as data: The promise and pitfalls of automatic content analysis methods for political texts. Political Analysis, 21(3), 267–297.
Gupta, J. (2014). The history of global climate governance. Cambridge University Press.
Hafner-Burton, E. M., & Montgomery, A. H. (2006). Power positions: International organizations, social networks, and conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50(1).
Hage, F. M. (2013). Coalition building and consensus in the Council of the European Union. British Journal of Political Science, 481–504.
Hale, T., Held, D., & Young, K. (2013). Gridlock: Why global cooperation is failing when we need it most. Polity.
Hochstetler, K., & Viola, E. (2012). Brazil and the politics of climate change: Beyond the global commons. Environmental Politics, 21(5), 753–771.
Hovi, J., Sprinz, D. F., Saelen, H., Underdal, A. (2017). The club approach: A gateway to effective climate co-operation? British Journal of Political Science, 49(3).
Hurrell, A., & Sengupta, S. (2012). Emerging powers, north-south relations and global climate politics. International Affairs, 88(3), 463–484.
Ikenberry, G. J. (2011). The future of the liberal world order: Internationalism after America. Foreign Affairs, 90(3), 56–68.
Johnson, T., & Urpelainen, J. (2019). The more things change, the more they stay the same: Developing countries’ unity at the nexus of trade and environmental policy. Review of International Organizations, 1–29.
Jupille, J., Mattli, W., & Snidal, D. (2013). Institutional choice and global commerce. Oxford University Press.
Kammerer, M., & Namhata, C. (2018). What drives the adoption of climate change mitigation policy? A dynamic network approach to policy diffusion. Policy Sciences Forthcoming.
Kasa, S., Gullberg, A. T., & Heggelund, G. (2008). The Group of 77 in the international climate negotiations: Recent developments and future directions. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 8, 113–127.
Keohane, R. O. (1984). After Hegemony. Princeton University Press.
Keohane, R. (1990). Multilateralism: An agenda for research. International Journal, 45(4), 731–764.
Keohane, R., & Martin, L. L. (1995). The promise of institutionalist theory. International Security, 20(1), 39–51.
Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1973). Power and interdependence. Survival, 15(4), 158–165.
Keohane, R. O., & Victor, D. G. (2016). Cooperation and discord in global climate policy. Nature Climate Change, 2016(6), 570–575.
Klock, C., Castro, P., Weiler, F., & Blaxekjaer, L. O. (2021). Coalitions in the climate change negotiations. Routledge.
Kreft, S., Eckstein, D., Junghans, L., Kerestan, C., & Hagen U. (2013). Global climate risk index 2014. Who suffers most from extreme weather events (pp. 1–31).
Le, Quoc, and Tomas Mikolov. 2014. Distributed Representations of Sentences and Documents. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning - Volume 32. ICML’14 JMLR.org pp. II–1188–II–1196.
March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1998). The institutional dynamics of international political orders. International Organization, 52(4), 943–969.
Mearsheimer, J. J. (1994). The false promise of international institutions. International Security, 19(3).
Meckling, J., Kelsey, N., Biber, E., & Zysman, J. (2015). Winning coalitions for climate policy. Science, 349(6253), 1170–1172.
Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G. S., & Dean, J. (2013). Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In C. J. C. Burges, L. Bottou, M. Welling, Z. Ghahramani, & K. Q. Weinberger (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems 26 (pp. 3111–3119). Curran Associates, Inc.
Miller, M. A. (1995). The third world in global environmental politics. Lynne Rienner.
Milner, H. V., & Tingley, D. (2011). Who supports global economic engagement? The sources of preferences in American foreign economic policy. International Organization, 65(1), 37–68.
Najam, A. (2005). Developing countries and global environmental governance: From contestation to participation to engagement. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 5(3).
Narlikar, A. (2003). International trade and developing countries: Bargaining coalitions in the GATT and WTO. Routledge.
Narlikar, A., & Odell, J. (2006). The strict distributive strategy for a bargaining coalition: the Like Minded Group in the World Trade Organization. Negotiating trade: Developing countries in the WTO and NAFTA.
Nielson, D. L., & Tierney, M. J. (2003). Delegation to international organizations: Agency theory and world bank environmental reform. International Organization, 57(2), 241–276.
Nordhaus, W. (2015). Climate clubs: Overcoming free-riding in international climate policy. American Economic Review, 105(4), 1139–1370.
Panke, D., Lang, S., & Wiedemann, A. (2015). Regional actors in the United Nations: exploring the regionalization of international negotiations. Global Affairs.
Pevehouse, J. C. (2002). Democracy from the outside-in? International organizations and democratization. International Organization, 56(3), 515–549.
Pierson, P. (2000). The limits of design: Explaining institutional origins and change. Governance, 13(4), 475–499.
Putnam, R. (1988). Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two-level games. International Organization.
Roberts, J. T., & Parks, B. C. (2007). A climate of injustice: Global inequality, North– South politics, and climate policy. MIT Press.
Roger, C., & Belliethathan, S. (2016). Africa in the global climate change negotiations. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 16(1), 91–108.
Russett, B., Oneal, J. R., & Davis, D. R. (1998). The third leg of the kantian tripod for peace: International organizations and militarized disputes, 1950–85. International Organizations, 52(3), 441–467.
Sprinz, D., & Vaahtoranta, T. (1994). The interest-based explanation of international environmental policy. International Organization, 48, 77–105.
Stern, N. (2015). Why are we waiting? The logic, urgency, and promise of tackling climate change. MIT Press.
Tierney, M. J. (2014). Rising powers and the regime for development finance. International Studies Review, 16(3), 452–455.
Tobin, P., Schmidt, N. M., Tosun, J., & Burns, C. (2018). Mapping states’ Paris climate pledges: Analysing targets and groups at COP21. Global Environmental Change, 48(11–21).
Torstad, V., & Saelen, H. (2018). Fairness in the climate negotiations: What explains variation in parties’ expressed conceptions? Climate Policy, 18(5), 6442–6654.
Underdal, A. (2017). Climate change and international relations (after Kyoto). Annual Review of Political Science, 20, 169–188.
Veen, T. (2011). Positions and salience in European Union politics: Estimation and validation of a new dataset. European Union Politics, 12(2), 267–288.
Victor, D. G. (2011). Global warming gridlock: Creating more effective strategies for protecting the planet. Cambridge University Press (CUP).
Vihma, A. (2011). India and the global climate governance: Between principles and pragmatism. The Journal of Environment and Development, 20(1), 69–94.
Walt, S. M. (1987). The origins of alliances. Cornell University Press.
Watts, J., & Depledge, J. (2018). Latin America in the climate change negotiations: Exploring the AILAC and ALBA coalitions. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 13, 533.
Weidmann, N. B., Kuse, D., & Gleditsch, K. S. (2010). The geography of the international system: The CShapes dataset. International Interactions, 36(1), 86–106.
Weisser, F. (2014). Practices, politics, performativities: Documents in the international negotiations on climate change. Political Geography, 40, 46–55.
Zurn, Michael. (2004). Global governance and legitimacy problems. Government and Opposition, 39(2), 260–287.