Advertisement

Paul Poast and Johannes Urpelainen. 2018. Organizing Democracy: How International Organizations Assist New Democracies (Chicago, IL:  University of Chicago Press)

  • Inken von Borzyskowski
Article

In Organizing Democracy: How International Organizations Assist New Democracies, Poast and Urpelainen tackle two big research questions related to international organizations (IOs): why do democratizing states seek membership in organizations, and how do organizations help member states become more democratic? These questions are crucial in today’s world where IO membership is certainly not taken for granted and where democracy is being called into question.

The standard answer to these questions – as Poast and Urpelainen note – is credible commitment. Democratizing states join IOs to signal to domestic and international audiences that they are committed to political reforms. IOs tie states’ hands to such reforms by allowing third-party monitoring, compliance verification, and potential international punishment if reforms are not implemented or upheld (Moravcsik 2000; Pevehouse 2002, 2005; Mansfield and Pevehouse 2006; Hyde 2011; Donno 2013). Much of the credible commitment research...

References

  1. von Borzyskowski, I. (2016). Resisting democracy assistance: Who seeks and receives technical election assistance? Review of International Organizations, 11(2), 247–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. von Borzyskowski, I., & Vabulas, F. (2018). Credible commitments? Explaining IGO suspensions to sanction political backsliding. International Studies Quarterly. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  3. Burnell, P. (Ed.). (2000). Democracy assistance: International cooperation for democratization. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
  4. Bush, S. (2015). The taming of democracy assistance: Why democracy promotion does not confront dictators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carothers, T. (1999). Aiding democracy abroad: The learning curve. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
  6. Donno, D. (2013). Defending democratic norms: International actors and the politics of electoral misconduct. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Finkel, S., Perez-Linan, A., & Seligson, M. (2007). The effects of U.S. foreign assistance on democracy building, 1990-2003. World Politics, 59, 404–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hyde, S. (2011). The pseudo-democrat’s dilemma. Why election monitoring became an international norm. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mansfield, E., & Pevehouse, J. (2006). Democratization and international organizations. International Organization, 60, 137–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Moravcsik, A. (2000). The origins of human rights regimes: Democratic delegation in postwar Europe. International Organization, 54, 217–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Morse, J., & Keohane, R. (2014). Contested multilateralism. Review of International Organizations, 9, 385–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pevehouse, J. (2002). With a little help from my friends? Regional organizations and the consolidation of democracy. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 611–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pevehouse, J. (2005). Democracy from above: Regional organizations and democratization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Florida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA

Personalised recommendations