Abstract
While a consensus seems to be emerging that bureaucracies of international organizations are of growing relevance for policy-making beyond the nation-state, we still do not systematically understand if and how exactly international bureaucracies seek to influence policy. Most importantly, there is a lack of concepts for a comparative assessment of bureaucratic influence across different International Organizations. This article addresses this shortcoming by offering a conceptualization of administrative styles. Depending on dominant strategic orientations shaping administrative routines, we identify four ideal types: a servant style, an advocacy style, a consolidator style, and an entrepreneurial style. We argue that the variation in administrative styles across different organizations can be explained by two factors, namely the internal and external challenges they face. The concept and theoretical explanation are illustrated in four case studies on the bureaucracies of the International Monetary Fund, the Bank for International Settlements, the Food and Agriculture Organization and the International Labor Organization.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
A servant-style does not imply suboptimal performance or the complete absence of strategy (Boyne and Walker 2004: 240). Rather, IPAs do not strive to exert influence of their own in IO policy-making as they do not attempt to realize own objectives.
Previous studies on the IMF have often put a heavy focus on the program work (i.e., lending), which is the only area of work were member state play a significantly more dominant role since it is their money that is being lent (Stone 2012). In contrast, our interviews focus on policy work of the IMF in order to be able to compare its activities with the other three international organizations in this paper.
References
Aberbach, J. D., Putnam, R. D., & Rockman, B. A. (1981). Bureaucrats and politicians in western democracies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Adam, C., Bauer, M. W., Knill, C., & Studinger, P. (2007). The termination of public organizations: Theoretical perspectives to revitalize a promising research area. Public Organization Review, 7(3), 221–236.
Baccaro, L., & Mele, V. (2012). Pathology of path-dependency? The ILO and the challenge of ‘new governance. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 65(2), 195–224.
Ban, C., & Gallagher, K. (2014). Recalibrating policy orthodoxy: The IMF since the great recession. Governance, 28(2), 131–146.
Barnett, M., & Finnemore, M. (2004). Rules for the world: International organizations in global politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Bauer, M. W., & Ege, J. (2016). Bureaucratic autonomy of international organizations’ secretariats. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(7), 1019–1037.
Beach, D. (2004). The unseen hand in treaty reform negotiations: The role and influence of the council secretariat. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(3), 408–439.
Bernholz, P. (2009). Are international organizations like the Bank for International Settlements unable to die? The Review of International Organizations, 4(4), 361–381.
BIS (2016). About Bank for International Settlements. Available online at http://www.bis.org/about/index.htm. Accessed Feb 2016
Boschken, H. (1988). Strategic design and organisational change. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
Boyne, G. A., & Walker, R. M. (2004). Strategy content and public service organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(2), 231–252.
Broome, A. (2015). Back to basics: The great recession and the narrowing of IMF policy advice. Governance, 28(2), 147–165.
Broome, A., & Seabrooke, L. (2012). Seeing like an international organisation. New Political Economy, 17(1), 1–16.
Broome, A., & Seabrooke, L. (2015). Shaping policy curves: Cognitive authority in transnational capacity building. Public Administration, 93(4), 956–972.
Cerny, P. G. (2010). Rethinking world politics: A theory of transnational neopluralism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chorev, N. (2012). The World Health Organization between north and south. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Chwieroth, J. M. (2010). Shrinking the state: Neoliberal economists and social spending in Latin America. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Chwieroth, J. M. (2013). “The silent revolution:” how the staff exercise informal governance over IMF lending. The Review of International Organizations, 8(2), 265–290.
Copelovitch, M. S. (2010). Master or servant? Common agency and the political economy of IMF lending. International Studies Quarterly, 54(1), 49–77.
Cox, R. W. (1973). ILO: Limited monarchy. In R. W. Cox & H. K. Jacobsen (Eds.), The anatomy of influence (pp. 102–138). New Haven: Yale University Press.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.
Douglas, W., Ferguson, J. P., & Klett, E. (2004). An effective confluence of forces in support of workers’ rights: ILO standards, US trade Laws, unions, and NGOs. Human Rights Quarterly, 26(2), 273–299.
Eckhard, S., & Ege, J. (2016). International bureaucracies and their influence on policy-making: A review of empirical evidence. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(7), 960–978.
FAO (2016). About FAO. Available online at http://www.fao.org/about/en/. Accessed June 2016
Greenwood, R., & Hinings, C. R. (1996). Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1022–1054.
Haas, E. B. (1964). Beyond the Nation-State. Functionalism and International Organization. Palo alto: Stanford University Press.
Haftel, Y. Z., & Thompson, A. (2006). The independence of international organization: Concept and applications. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50(2), 253–275.
Hanrieder, T. (2014). Gradual change in international Organisations: Agency theory and historical institutionalism. Politics, 34(4), 324–333.
Harman, S. (2011). Governing health risk by buying behaviour. Political Studies, 59(4), 867–883.
Hartlapp, M. (2007). On enforcement, management and persuasion: Different logics of implementation policy in the EU and the ILO. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(3), 653–674.
Hawkins, D. G., Lake, D. A., Nielson, D. L., & Tierney, M. J. (2006). Delegation and agency in international organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2015). Delegation and pooling in international organizations. The Review of International Organizations, 10(3), 305–328.
Hughes, S., & Haworth, N. (2011). The International Labour Organization. Coming in from the cold. Abingdon: Routledge.
International Labour Organization (2016). How the ILO works. Available online at: http://www.ilo.org/global/about-the-ilo/how-the-ilo-works/lang--en/index.htm. Accessed Sept 2016
International Monetary Fund (2010). IMF Survey: Europe and IMF Agree €110 Billion Financing Plan with Greece. Available online at http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/survey/so/2010/car050210a.htm. Accessed Apr 2016
International Monetary Fund (2016). About the IMF. Available online at https://www.imf.org/external/about.htm. Accessed Feb 2016
Johnson, T., & Urpelainen, J. (2014). International bureaucrats and the formation of intergovernmental organizations: Institutional design discretion sweetens the pot. International Organization, 68(1), 177–209.
Knill, C. (2001). The Europeanisation of national administrations: Patterns of institutional change and persistence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Knill, C., & Bauer, M. W. (2016). Policy-making by international public administrations: Concepts, causes and consequences. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(7), 949–959.
Knill, C., & Grohs, S. (2015). Administrative styles of EU institutions. In M. W. Bauer & J. Trondal (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook on the European administrative system (pp. 93–107). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lenz, T., Bezuijen, J., Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2014). Patterns of international organization: Task specific vs. general purpose. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 49, 131–155.
Martin, L. (2006). Distribution, information, and delegation to international organization: The case of IMF conditionality. In D. G. Hawkins, D. A. Lake, D. L. Nielson, & M. J. Tierney (Eds.), Delegation and agency in international organizations (pp. 140–164). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mayntz, R., & Derlien, H. (1989). Party patronage and politicization of the west German administrative elite 1970 – 1987 – Toward hybridization? Governance, 2(4), 384–404.
Meyer, R. E., Egger-Peitler, I., Höllerer, M. A., & Hammerschmid, G. (2014). Of bureaucrats and passionate public managers. Institutional logics, executive identities, and public service. Public Administration, 92(4), 861–885.
Momani, B. (2005). Recruiting and diversifying IMF technocrats. Global Society, 19(2), 167–187.
Moschella, M. (2012). IMF surveillance in crisis: The past, present and future of the reform process. Global Society, 26(1), 43–60.
Nay, O. (2011). What drives reforms in international organizations? External pressure and bureaucratic entrepreneurs in the UN response to AIDS. Governance, 24(4), 689–712.
Nelson, S. C. (2014). Playing favorites: How shared beliefs shape the IMF's lending decisions. International Organization, 68(2), 297–328.
Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179.
Ozgercin, K. (2012). Seeing like the BIS on capital rules: Institutionalising self-regulation in global finance. New Political Economy, 17(1), 97–116.
Pache, A., & Santos, F. (2010). When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 455–476.
Peters, B. G. (2010). The politics of bureaucracy: an introduction to comparative public administration. Abingdon: Routledge.
Richardson, J. (Ed.). (1982). Policy styles in Western Europe. London: Allen & Unwin.
Rittberger, V., & Zangl, B. (2012). International organization. London: Macmillan Education.
Scharpf, F. W. (1994). Games real actors could play. Positive and negative coordination in embedded negotiations. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 6(1), 27–54.
Sharma, P. (2013). Bureaucratic imperatives and policy outcomes: The origins of World Bank structural adjustment lending. Review of International Political Economy, 20(4), 667–686.
Simon, H. A. (1997). Administrative behaviour. New York: The Free Press.
Stone, D. (2008). Global public policy, transnational policy communities, and their networks. Policy Studies Journal, 36(1), 19–38.
Stone, R. W. (2012). Lending Credibility: The International Monetary Fund and the Post-Communist Transition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Stone, R. W. (2013). Informal governance in international organizations: Introduction to the special issue. The Review of International Organizations, 8(2), 121–136.
Thacker, S. C. (1999). The high politics of IMF lending. World Politics, 52(01), 38–75.
Toniolo, G., & Clement, P. (2005). Central bank cooperation at the Bank for International Settlements (pp. 1930–1973). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Truman, E. M. (2009). The IMF and the global crisis: Role and reform. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics.
Van Deale, J. (2008). The International Labour Organization (ILO) in past and present research. International Review of Social History, 53(3), 485–511.
Vaubel, R. (2006). Principal-agent problems in international organizations. The Review of International Organizations, 1(2), 125–138.
Vermeulen, P. A. M., Zietsma, R. G., & Langley, A. (2016). Strategic responses to institutional complexity. Strategic Organization, 14(4), 277–286.
Vetterlein, A. (2012). Seeing like the World Bank on poverty. New Political Economy, 17(1), 35–58.
Vogel, D. (1986). National styles of regulation: Environmental policy in great Britain and the United States. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Weaver, C. (2010). The politics of performance evaluation: Independent evaluation at the International Monetary Fund. The Review of International Organizations, 5(3), 365–385.
Weaver, C., & Leiteritz, R. J. (2005). “Our poverty is a world full of dreams:” reforming the World Bank. Global Governance, 11(3), 369–388.
Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. New York: Basic Books.
Woods, N. (2006). The globalizers: The IMF, the World Bank, and their borrowers. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Xu, Y., & Weller, P. (2008). To be but not to be seen: Exploring the impact of international civil servants. Public Administration, 86(1), 35–51.
Zürn, M., Binder, M., & Ecker-Ehrhardt, M. (2012). International authority and its politicization. International Theory, 4(1), 69–106.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the German Research Foundation under grant number KN 891/7-1. The authors would like to thank Dionys Zink for his research assistance and Yves Steinbach as well as two anonymous referees for their helpful comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Knill, C., Bayerlein, L., Enkler, J. et al. Bureaucratic influence and administrative styles in international organizations. Rev Int Organ 14, 83–106 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-018-9303-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-018-9303-x