Achen, C. (2002). Toward a new political methodology: Microfoundations and ART. Annual Review of Political Science, 5, 423–450.
Aggestam, L. (2008). Introduction: Ethical power Europe? International Affairs, 84(1), 1–11.
Aldrich, J., & Cnudde, C. F. (1975). Probing the bounds of conventional wisdom: A comparison of Regression, Probit, and discriminant analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 19(3), 571–608.
Andersen, Robert. 2004. Regression models for ordinal data. In Michael S. Lewis-Beck, Alan Bryman, and Tim Futing Liao (eds.) The SAGE Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods: Volume 3. Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 941-942.
Apodaca, C., & Stohl, M. (1999). United States human rights policy and foreign assistance. International Studies Quarterly, 43, 185–198.
Arts, K. (2000). Integrating human rights into development cooperation: The case of the Lomé Convention. Cambridge: Kluwer Law International.
Balfour, R. (2006). Principles of democracy and human rights. In S. Lucarelli & I. Manners (Eds.), Values and principles in European Union foreign policy. New York: Routledge.
Bartels, L. (2005). Human rights conditionality in the EU’s international agreements. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bearce, D. H., & Tirone, D. C. (2010). Foreign aid effectiveness and the strategic goals of donor governments. Journal of Politics, 72(3), 837–851.
Berry, W. D., Golder, M., & Milton, D. (2012). Improving tests of theories positing interaction. The Journal of Politics, 74(3), 653–671.
Bonaglia, F., Goldstein, A., & Petito, F. (2006). Values in European Union development and cooperation policy. In S. Lucarelli & I. Manners (Eds.), Values and principles in European Union foreign policy. New York: Routledge.
Bradley, A. (2005). An ACP perspective and overview of article 96 cases. The European Centre for Development Policy Management, August. http://ecdpm.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/DP-64D-ACP-Perspective-Overview-Article96-Cases-2005.pdf.
Bueno de Mesquita, B., Downs, G. W., Smith, A., & Cherif, F. M. (2005). Thinking inside the box: A closer look at democracy and human rights. International Studies Quarterly, 49, 439–457.
Checkel, J. T. (2005). International institutions and socialization in Europe: Introduction and framework. International Organization, 59(Fall), 801–826.
Cingranelli, D. L., & Richards, D. L. (1999). Measuring the level, pattern, and sequence of government respect for physical integrity rights. International Studies Quarterly, 43(2), 407–417.
Cingranelli, D. L., & Richards, D. L. (2008). The Cingranelli-Richards Human Rights Dataset Version, 2008.03.12 http://www.humanrightsdata.org.
Clement, D. (2012). Human rights in Canadian domestic and foreign politics. Human Rights Quarterly, 34(3), 751–778.
Conrad, C. R. (2014). Divergent incentives for dictators: Domestic institutions and (international Promises not to) torture. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 58(1), 34–67.
Conrad, C., & DeMeritt, J. (2013). Constrained by the Bank and the ballot: Unearned revenue, democracy and state incentives to repress. Journal of Peace Research, 50(1), 105–119.
Conrad, C., & Ritter, E. H. (2013). Treaties, tenure, and torture: The conflicting domestic effects of international law. Journal of Politics, 75(2), 397–409.
Coppedge, M., Gerring, J., Lindberg, S. I., Skaaning, S.-E., Teorell, J., Altman, D., Bernhard, M., Fish, M. S., Glynn, A., Hicken, A., Knutsen, C. H., Marquardt, K. L., McMann, K., Miri, F., Paxton, P., Pemstein, D., Staton, J., Tzelgov, E., Wang, Y.-t., & Zimmerman, B. (2015). V-Dem [country-year/country-date] dataset v5. Varieties of democracy (V-Dem) project.
Crawford, G. (1997). Foreign aid and political conditionality: Issues of effectiveness and consistency. Democratization, 4(3), 69–108.
Crawford, G. (2001). Foreign aid and political reform: A comparative analysis of democracy assistance and political conditionality. New York: Palgrave.
Cuyckens, H. (2010). Human rights clauses in agreements between the community and third countries: The case of the Cotonou agreement. Working Paper, March. https://www.law.kuleuven.be/iir/nl/onderzoek/wp/WP147e.pdf.
Dai, X. (2005). Why comply? The domestic constituency mechanism. International Organization, 59(Spring), 363–398.
Davenport, C. (2007). State repression and political order. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 1–23.
Davenport, C. (2010). State repression and the domestic democratic Peace. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Davenport, C., & Armstrong, D. A. (2004). Democracy and the violations of human rights: A statistical analysis from 1976 to 1996. American Journal of Political Science, 48(3), 538–554.
De Felice, D. (2015). Diverging visions on political conditionality: The role of domestic politics and international socialization in French and British aid. World Development, 75, 26–45.
Del Biondo, K. (2011). EU aid conditionality in ACP countries: Explaining inconsistency in EU sanctions practice. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 7(3), 380–395.
Donno, D. (2010). Who is punished? Regional intergovernmental Organizations and the enforcement of democratic norms. International Organization, 64(4), 593–625.
Donno, D. (2013). Defending democratic norms: International actors and the politics of electoral misconduct. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dunning, T. (2004). Conditioning the effects of aid: Cold war politics, donor credibility, and democracy in Africa. International Organization, 58(2), 409–423.
Emmanuel, N. G. (2013). Democratization in Malawi: Responding to international and domestic pressures. African and Asian Studies, 12, 415–434.
European Council. (2015). Article 96 of the Cotonou Agreement–Consultation Procedure. http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/eu-africa/article-96-cotonou-agreement/. Accessed June 2015.
Fariss, C. J. (2014). Respect for human rights has improved over time: Modeling the changing standard of accountability. American Political Science Review, 108(2), 297–318.
Fariss, C. J. (forthcoming). The changing standard of accountability and the positive relationship between human rights treaty ratification and compliance. British Journal of Political Science.
Fariss, C. J., & Schnakenberg, K. E. (2014). Measuring mutual dependence between state repressive actions. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 58(6), 1003–1032.
Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2011). Human Rights in German Development Policy. BMZ Strategy Paper 4.
Fierro, E. (2003). The EU’s approach to human rights conditionality in practice. New York: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Furuoka, F. (2005). Human rights conditionality and aid allocation: Case study of Japanese foreign aid policy. Perspectives on Global Development and Technology, 4(2), 125–146.
Geddes, B., Wright, J., & Frantz, E. (2014). Autocratic breakdown and regime transitions: A new dataset. Perspectives on Politics, 12(2), 313–331.
Girod, D. M. (2012). Effective foreign aid following civil war: The nonstrategic-desperation hypothesis. American Journal of Political Science, 56(1), 188–201.
Gleditsch, N. P., Wallensteen, P., Eriksson, M., Sollenberg, M., & Strand, H. (2002). Armed conflict 1946-2001: A new dataset. Journal of Peace Reseearch, 39(5), 615–637.
Goemans, H., & Marinov, N. (2014). Coups and democracy. British Journal of Political Science, 44(4), 799–825.
Hafner-Burton, E. M. (2005). Trading human rights: How preferential trade agreements influence government repression. International Organization, 59(3), 593–629.
Hafner-Burton, E. M. (2008). Sticks and stones: Naming and shaming the human rights enforcement problem. International Organization, 62(4), 689–716.
Hafner-Burton, E. M. (2009). Forced to be good: Why trade agreements boost human rights. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Hafner-Burton, E. M., & Tsutsui, K. (2005). Human rights in a globalizing world: The paradox of empty Promises. American Journal of Sociology, 110(5), 1373–1411.
Hafner-Burton, E. M., & Tsutsui, K. (2007). Justice lost! The failure of international human rights law to matter where needed most. Journal of Peace Research, 44(4), 407–425.
Harbom, L., & Wallensteen, P. (2009). Armed conflicts, 1946-2008. Journal of Peace Research, 46(4), 577–587.
Hathaway, O. (2003). The cost of commitment. Stanford law Review, 55(5), 1821–1862.
Hathaway, O. (2005). Between power and principle: An integrated theory of international law. The University of Chicaco law Review, 72(2), 469–536.
Hazelzet, H. (2005). Suspension of development cooperation: An instrument to promote human rights and democracy? The European Centre for Development Policy Management, August. http://global.wisc.edu/development/resources/clayton-hazelzet.pdf.
Hill, D. (2010). Estimating the effects of human rights treaties on state behavior. Journal of Politics, 72(4), 1161–1174.
Holland, M. (2002). The European Union and the third world. New York: Palgrave.
Hyde, S. D. (2011). The pseudo-Democrat's dilemma: Why election monitoring became an international norm. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1–24.
Keohane, R. O., & Martin, L. L. (1995). The promise of institutionalist theory. International Security, 20(1), 39–51.
Kim, H., & Sikkink, K. (2010). Explaining the deterrence effect of human rights prosecutions for transitional countries. International Studies Quarterly, 54, 939–963.
King, G., Zeng, L. (2007). When can history be our guide? The pitfalls of counterfactual inference. International Studies Quarterly, 51(1), 183–210.
Kreutz, J. (2005). Hard measures by a soft power? Sanctions policy of the European Union 1981–2004. Bonn International Center for Conversion. http://www.bicc.de/uploads/tx_bicctools/paper45.pdf.
Kreutz, J. (2015). Human rights, Geostrategy, and EU foreign policy, 1989-2008. International Organization, 69, 195–217.
Leonard, M. (2005). Why Europe will run the 21st century. London: Fourth Estate.
Lumley, T., Diehr, P., Emerson, S., & Lu, C. (2002). The importance of the normality assumption in large public health datasets. Annual Review of Public Health, 23, 151–169.
Lupu, Y. (2013a). Best evidence: The role of Information in domestic judicial enforcement of international human rights agreements. International Organization, 67(3), 469–503.
Lupu, Y. (2013b). The informative power of treaty commitment: Using the spatial model to address selection effects. American Journal of Political Science, 57(4), 912–925.
Lupu, Y. (2015). Legislative veto players and the effects of international human rights agreements. American Journal of Political Science, 59(3), 578–594.
Mackie, J., & Zinke, J. (2005). When agreement breaks down, what next? The Cotonou Agreement’s article 96 consultation procedure. The European Centre for Development Policy Management, August. http://ecdpm.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/DP-64A-Cotonou-Agreements-Article-96-Consultation-Procedure-2005.pdf.
Manners, I. (2002). Normative power Europe: A contradiction in terms? Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(2), 235–258.
Manners, I. (2008). The normative ethics of the European Union. International Affairs, 84(1), 45–60.
Mbangu, L. (2005). Recent cases of article 96 consultations. The European Centre for Development Policy Management, August. http://ecdpm.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/DP-64C-Recent-Cases-Article96-Consultations-2005.pdf.
Meernik, J., Krueger, E. L., & Poe, S. C. (1998). Testing models of U.S. foreign policy: Foreign aid during and after the cold war. Journal of Politics, 60(1), 63–85.
Miller, V. (2004). The human rights clause in the EU’s external agreements. House of Commons Library, Research Paper 04/33.
Mosley, L. (2010). Labor rights and multinational production. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Neumayer, E. (2003). Is respect for human rights rewarded? Human Rights Quarterly, 25, 510–527.
Neumayer, E. (2005). Do International human rights treaties improve respect for human rights? Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49(6), 925–953.
Nielsen, R. A. (2013). Rewarding human rights? Selective aid sanctions against repressive states. International Studies Quarterly, 57, 791–803.
Orbie, J. (2011). Promoting labour standards through trade: Normative power or regulatory state Europe? In R. G. Whitman (Ed.), Normative power Europe: Empirical and theoretical Perspectives (pp. 161–184). UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Piron, L.-H. (2005). Integrating human rights into development: A synthesis of donor approaches and experiences. Overseas Development Institute. Available at: https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/4404.pdf. Accessed 5 June 2017.
Poe, S. C., & Tate, C. N. (1994). Repression of human rights to personal integrity in the 1980s: A global analysis. American Political Science Review, 88(4), 853–872.
Portela, C. (2007). Aid suspensions as coercive tools? The European Union’s experience in the African-Caribbean-Pacific (ACP) context. Review of European and Russian Affairs, 3(2), 38–53.
Portela, C. (2010). European Union sanctions and foreign policy: When and why do they work? New York: Routledge.
Portela, C., & Mbangu-Kiala, L. (2007). Political dialogue and human rights in the framework of the Cotonou agreement. Directorate-General for External Policies of the Union, 10 July. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/etudes/join/2007/381397/EXPO-AFET_ET(2007)381397_EN.pdf.
Powell, E. J., & Staton, J. K. (2009). Domestic judicial institutions and human rights treaty violation. International Studies Quarterly, 53, 149–174.
Prorok, A. K., & Appel, B. J. (2014). Compliance with international humanitarian law: Democratic third parties and civilian targeting in interstate war. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 58(4), 713–740.
Richards, D. L. (2016). The myth of Information effects in human rights data. Human Rights Quarterly, 38(2), 477–492.
Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: J. Wiley & Sons.
Saltnes, J. D. (2013). The EU’s human rights policy: Unpacking the literature on the EU’s implementation of aid conditionality. ARENA Centre for European Studies, March. http://www.sv.uio.no/arena/english/research/publications/arena-publications/workingpapers/working-papers2013/wp2-13.pdf.
Schnakenberg, K. E., & Fariss, C. J. (2014). Dynamic patterns of human rights practices. Political Science Research and Methods, 2(01), 1–31.
Schrodt, P. A. (2014). Seven deadly sins of contemporary quantitative political analysis. Journal of Peace Research, 51(2), 287–300.
Simmons, B. A. (2009). Mobilizing for human rights: International law and domestic politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, K. E. (1998). The use of political conditionality in the EU's relations with third countries: How effective? European Foreign Affairs Review, 3, 253–274.
Spilker, G., & Böhmelt, T. (2013). The impact of preferential trade agreements on governmental repression Revisited. Review of International Organizations, 8, 343–361.
Szymanski, M., & Smith, M. E. (2005). Coherence and conditionality in European foreign policy: Negotiating the EU–Mexico global agreement. Journal of Common Market Studies, 43(1), 171–192.
Von Stein, J. (2015). Making Promises, keeping Promises: Democracy, ratification and compliance in international human rights law. British Journal of Political Science forthcoming (published online as FirstView).
Whitman, R. G. (2011). Normative power Europe: Empirical and theoretical Perspectives, Palgrave studies in European Union. Politics: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wu, C.-H. (2013). The evolution of EU-ASEAN relations: Legal framework and policy change. National Taiwan University law Review, 8(2), 329–372.
Youngs, R. (2004). Normative dynamics and strategic interests in the EU’s external identity. Journal of Common Market Studies, 42(2), 415–435.
Zimelis, A. (2011). Conditionality and the EU-ACP Partnership: A misguided approach to development? Australian Journal of Political Science, 46(3), 389–406.