A porous humanitarian shield: The laws of war, the red cross, and the killing of civilians
- 1.5k Downloads
An important literature examines the attempts by the international community in inducing or coercing conflict parties in civil wars to refrain from committing atrocities against the civilian population. We examine in this article whether a non-governmental actor, the distinctively neutral and independent International Committee of the Red Cross, whose mission includes the promotion of humanitarian law and the protection of the civilian population, has such a restraining effect on the conflict parties. Our results suggest that the more time has passed since the ratification of the relevant Geneva Conventions and Protocols, the larger is the risk of civilian victimization. We cannot find evidence that the ICRC’s presence in conflict zones and the seminars it conducts to spread humanitarian law make a crucial difference. Case studies of Bosnia and Darfur indicate that shaming strategies and thus a relatively unusual instrument for the traditionally neutral actor did not abate the killings; the statistical evidence in the form of Granger causality tests rather show that the killing and harming precedes the naming and shaming.
KeywordsCivil war Laws of war Geneva conventions International Committee of the Red Cross One-sided violence Compliance
The article has profited from comments by the audiences at several conferences and seminars. We are especially grateful to Kristin Eck, Erik Gartzke, Michaela Mattes, and Winfried Pohlmeier as well as the editor and two anonymous reviewers for detailed recommendations. We would also like to thank the Deutsche Stiftung Friedensforschung for supporting our research under grant DSF 004/07 and Isabel Schneider, Romy Escher, Sebastian Kuhn, Marina Beielstein, Kristof Lintz, Ivo Sieder and Oliver Neumann for research assistance, and the ICRC for access to its library resources and a discussion with ICRC collaborator Dominique Loye about our results.
- Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Balmer, D. (1984). Grünspan. Mensch und Humanität. Zürich: Abedul.Google Scholar
- Ben-Tov, A. (1990). Das Rote Kreuz kam zu spät. Zürich: Amman.Google Scholar
- Bugnion, F. (2000). Le Comité International de la Croix-Rouge et la protection des victimes de la guerre. Geneva: Comité Internationale de la Croix-Rouge.Google Scholar
- Correlates of War Project. (2008). State system membership list, v2008.1. http://correlatesofwar.org. Accessed 19 Aug 2015.
- Delorenzi, S. (1999). Contending with the impasse in international humanitarian law. Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross.Google Scholar
- Downes, A. B. (2008). Targeting civilians in war. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
- Favez, J.-C. (1988). Une mission impossible ? Le CICR, les déportations et les camps de concentration nazi. Lausanne: Éditions Payot.Google Scholar
- Finnemore, M. (1996). National interests in international society. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
- Goodman, R., & Jinks, D. (2004). How to influence states: Socialization and international human rights law. Duke Law Journal, 54(3), 621–703.Google Scholar
- Hafner-Burton, E. M. (2009). Forced to be good. Why trade agreements boost human rights. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
- Heston, A., Summers, R., & Aten, B. (2009). Penn World Table Version 6.3, Center for International Comparisons of Production, Income and Prices: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
- Hultman, L., Kathman, J., & Shannon, M. (2013). United Nations peacekeeping and civilian protection in civil war. American Journal of Political Science, 57(4), 875–891.Google Scholar
- International Committee of the Red Cross (2009). Annual Report 2008. Geneva: ICRC.Google Scholar
- Kuperman, A. J. (2001). The limits of humanitarian interventions: Genocide in Rwanda. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
- Marshall, M. G., & Jaggers, K. (2002). Polity IV dataset. Center for International Development and Conflict Management, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
- Pierson, P. (2003). Politics in time: history, institutions, and social analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Risse, T., Ropp, S. C., & Sikkink, K. (Eds.). (1999). The power of human rights. International norms and domestic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Tomz, M., Wittenberg, J., & King, G. (2003). CLARIFY: Software for interpreting and presenting statistical results. Version 2.1. Stanford University, University of Wisconsin, and Harvard University. http://gking.harvard.edu/.
- Valentino, B. A. (2004). Final solutions: mass killing and genocide in the 20th century. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
- Weinstein, J. M. (2007). Inside rebellion: the politics of insurgent violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar