NGO monitoring and the legitimacy of international cooperation: A strategic analysis
- 848 Downloads
States often invite NGOs to monitor international cooperation. Under what circumstances are states likely to take this step? We argue that NGO monitoring allows states to provide domestic publics with credible evidence regarding successful cooperation, but that this credibility carries a cost: if states fail to cooperate, a participating NGO will expose this failure and thus delegitimize the cooperation effort. Our formal analysis indicates that states obtain a dual benefit from NGO participation: in addition to enhanced legitimacy, NGO scrutiny helps states credibly commit to high cooperation levels vis-á-vis each other. The increased costs of failure, however, may deter state use of NGO monitoring. Surprisingly, we find that NGO monitoring is the most useful for states when the cooperation cost is relatively low. We explore the empirical relevance of our theoretical argument in NGO monitoring of World Bank development projects and compliance with the Kyoto Protocol. We also explain why NGO monitoring has been disallowed in the Global Environment Facility. Our analysis provides a firm strategic foundation for the idea that NGO participation sometimes confers benefits to states, and our theory has several empirically falsifiable implications.
KeywordsNon-governmental organizations International cooperation Monitoring Legitimacy Formal modeling
- Al-Jurf, S. (2007). Participatory development & NGOs: A. look at the World Bank in the 1990s. Viewed 6 Nov 2010 from http://www.uiowa.edu/ifdebook/ebook2/contents/part2-I.V..shtml.
- Bank Information Center (2003) BIC toolkits for activists, issue 6: The role of Congress in multilateral development bank reform. Viewed 6 Nov 2010 from http://www.bicusa.org/en/Article.304.aspx.
- Clark, A. M. (2001). Diplomacy of conscience: Amnesty International and changing human rights norms. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Coleman, W., & Wayland, S. (2006). The origins of global civil society and non-territorial governance: Some empirical reflections. Global Governance, 12(3), 241–261Google Scholar
- Crossette, B. (1992). Movement builds to fight harmful projects in poor nations. The New York Times, 23 Jun 1992.Google Scholar
- Edwards, M. (2001). Introduction. In M. Edwards & J. Gaventa (Eds.), Global citizen action. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
- Environmental News Service (2005). British industry cuts climate emissions below expectations. Viewed 5 Dec 2010 from http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/jul2005/2005-07-21-04.html.
- EurActiv (2007). Global carbon trading ‘short-sighted’, NGO says. Accessed 14 Jun, viewed 5 Dec 2010 from http://www.euractiv.com/en/climate-change/global-carbon-trading-short-sighted-ngo/article-164601.
- Falk, R. (1993). The making of global citizenship. In J. Brecher, J. B. Childs, & J. Cutler (Eds.), Global visions: Beyond the New World Order. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
- Florini, A., & Simmons, P. (2000). What the world needs now? In A. Florini (Ed.), The third force: The rise of transnational civil society. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
- Fox, J., & Brown, L. D. (1998a). Assessing the impact of NGO advocacy campaigns on World Bank projects and policies. In J. Fox & L. D. Brown (Eds.), The struggle for accountability: The World Bank, NGOs, and grassroots movements. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Fox, J., & Brown, L. D. (Eds.) (1998b). The struggle for accountability: The World Bank, NGOs and grassroots movements. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Gemmill, B., & Bamidele-Izu, A. (2002). The role of NGOs and civil society in global environmental governance. In D. C. Esty & M. H. Ivanova (Eds.), Global environmental governance: Options & opportunities. New Haven: Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy.Google Scholar
- Global Environment Facility (2008) Overview of the GEF. Viewed 18 Nov 2010 from http://220.127.116.11/uploadedFiles/Focal_Areas/Pollutants/POPS-GEF-Overview-June08pdf.pdf.
- Global Environment Facility (2010). What is the GEF? Viewed 17 Nov 2010 from http://18.104.22.168/interior_right.aspx?id=50.
- Gulf Times (2006). EU states warned on missing emission plan deadline. Accessed 8 Apr, viewed 5 Dec 2010 from http://www.gulf-times.com/site/topics/printArticle.asp?cu_no=2&item_no=80730&version=1&template_id=39&parent_id=21.
- Gwin, C. (1994). U.S. Relations with the World Bank 1945–1992. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
- Kapur, D., Lewis, J., & Webb, R. (1997). The World Bank: Its first half-century. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
- Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
- Keohane, R. O. (1984). After hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Linaweaver, S. (2002). Catching the boomerang: EIA, the World Bank, and excess accountability. SOAS Water Issues Group Occassional Papers 42.Google Scholar
- Nelson, P. (2000). Heroism and ambiguity: NGO advocacy in international policy. Voluntas, 13(4), 478–490.Google Scholar
- Pew Center on Global Climate Change (2010). History of the Kyoto Protocol. Viewed 9 Nov 2010 from http://www.pewclimate.org/history_of_kyoto.cfm.
- Reed, D. (1993). The Global Environment Facility and non-governmental organizations. American University Journal of International Law and Policy, 9(1), 191–213.Google Scholar
- Rich, B. (1994). Mortgaging the Earth: The World Bank, environmental improvishment, and the crisis of development. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
- Risse, T. (2000). The power of norms versus the norms of power: Transnational civil society and human rights. In A. Florini (Ed.), The third force: The rise of transnational civil society. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
- Robinson, E. (1992). At Earth Summit, south aims to send bill north; developing nations, putting priority on growth, say cleanup is possible—for a price. The Washington Post 1 June 1992.Google Scholar
- Shihata, I. (1991). The World Bank in a changing world (Vol. 2). Boston: M. Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
- Simmons, B. A. (2009). Mobilizing for human rights: International law in domestic politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Spiro, P. (1998). New global communities: Nongovernmental organizations in international decision making institutions. Washington Quarterly, 18(1), 45–56.Google Scholar
- Thomas, D. (2001). The Helsinki effect: International norms, human rights, and the demise of communism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Udall, L. (1998). The World Bank and public accountability: Has anything changed? In J. Fox & L. D. Brown (Eds.), The struggle for accountability: The World Bank, NGOs, and grassroots movements. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- United Nations (1997). UN Earth summit: Background. Viewed 28 Nov 2010 from http://www.un.org/geninfo/bp/envirp2.html.
- USAID (2001a). Multilateral development bank loans that raise environmental concerns: Introduction. Viewed 6 Nov 2010 from http://www.usaid.gov/pubs/mdb/introduction.html.
- USAID (2001b) Multilateral development bank loans that raise environmental concerns: Summary. Viewed 6 Nov 2010 from http://www.usaid.gov/pubs/mdb/index.html.
- Wade, R. (1997) Greening the Bank: The struggle over the environment 1970–1995. In D. Kapur, J. Lewis, & R. Webb (Eds.), The World Bank: It’s first half-century (Vol. 2). Brookings Institution, Greening the Bank.Google Scholar
- Xing, L., Xiaohua, S., & Jing, F. (2009). China committed to emission cut: Wen. China Daily 19 Dec, viewed 5 Dec 2010 from http://news.asiaone.com/News/Latest20091219-186871.html.