Abstract
We examine the impact of IMF programs on economic performance in 95 developing countries over the period 1993–2002. Three macroeconomic measures of economic performance are considered: the real per capita economic growth rate, the ratio of the fiscal surplus to GDP, and the ratio of the current account surplus to GDP. Three estimation techniques are used: censored-sample, full-sample instrumental-variable, and matching. Substantively, we find little statistical support that IMF programs contemporaneously improve real economic growth in participating countries, but stronger evidence of an improvement in economic growth in years following a program. We find that both the fiscal ratio and the current-account ratio improve contemporaneously with IMF participation relative to the counterfactual, with effects in succeeding years differing little from the impact effects. We conclude that the program-effect estimates of matching and other estimators will differ largely because of the sample included in estimation. Matching by its nature excludes country episodes associated with extreme values of the propensity score, while the instrumental-variable estimator includes those. If there is heterogeneity of performance response in extreme vs. moderate cases, the estimates differ systematically between the two techniques.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angrist, J. (2003). Treatment Effect Heterogeneity in Theory and Practice, MIT Working Paper 03–27.
Atoian, R., Conway P., Selowsky M., & Tsikata, T. (2004). Macroeconomic Adjustment in IMF-Supported Programs: Projections and Reality, IMF BP/04/2.
Atoyan, R., & Conway, P. (2005). Evaluating the Impact of IMF Programs: A Comparison of Matching and Instrumental-Variable Estimators, at http://www.unc.edu/home/pconway/dload/ac_imf.pdf.
Augurzky, B., & Kluve, J. (2004). Assessing the Performance of Matching Algorithms When Selection into Treatment is Strong, IZA Discussion Paper 1301, September.
Conway, P. (1994) IMF lending programs: participation and impact. Journal of Development Economics, 45, 365–391.
Conway, P. (2005). Duration and Recidivism in IMF Programs, processed.
Dehejia, R., & Wahba, S. (2002). Propensity score matching methods for non-experimental causal studies. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84/1, 151–161.
Dicks-Mireaux, L., Mecagni, M., & Schadler, S. (2000). Evaluating the effect of IMF lending to low-income countries. Journal of Development Economics, 61, 495–526.
Dreher, A. (2005). Does the IMF Influence Fiscal and Monetary Policy? Journal of Policy Reform, 8/3, 229–242.
Garuda, G. (2000). The distributional effects of IMF programs: a cross-country analysis. World Development, 28/6, 1031–1051.
Goldstein, M., & Montiel, P. (1986). Evaluating Fund Stabilization Programs with Multicountry Data: Some Methodological Pitfalls, IMF Staff Papers 33, pp. 304–344.
Greene, W. (1981). Sample selection bias as a specification error: Comment. Econometrica, 49(3), 795–798 (May).
Hardoy, I. (2003). Effect of IMF Programmes on Growth: A Reappraisal Using the Method of Matching, Institute for Social Research Paper 2003:040.
Heckman, J., & Navarro-Lozano, S. (2004). Using matching, instrumental variables and control functions to estimate economic choice models. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86, 30–57.
Heckman, J., & Vytlacil, E. (2005). Structural equations, treatment effects, and econometric policy evaluation. Econometrica, 73/3, 669–738.
Hutchison. (2004). Selection Bias and the Output Costs of IMF Programs, processed.
Imbens, G., & Angrist, J. (1994). Identification and estimation of local average treatment effects. Econometrica 62, 467–475.
Khan, M. (1990). The Macroeconomic Effects of Fund-Supported Adjustment Programs, IMF Staff Papers 37, 195–231.
Maddala, G. (1983). Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Mody, A., & Saravia, D. (2003). Catalyzing Capital Flows: Do IMF Programs Work as Commitment Devices?, IMF Working Paper WP/02.
Przeworski, & Vreeland, J. (2000). The effect of IMF programs on economic growth. Journal of Development Economics, 62, 385–421.
Rosenbaum, P., & Rubin, D. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70/1, 41–55.
Ul-Haque, N. & Khan, M. (1998). Do IMF-supprted Programs work? A Survey of the Cross-Country Empirical Evidence, IMF Working Paper, pp. 98–169.
Vreeland, J. (2003). The IMF and economic development. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
JEL codes
F33 · F34 · C34
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Atoyan, R., Conway, P. Evaluating the impact of IMF programs: A comparison of matching and instrumental-variable estimators. Rev Int Orgs 1, 99–124 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-006-6612-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-006-6612-2