Skip to main content
Log in

Morpho-molecular characterization of Brunneofissuraceae fam. nov., Cirsosia mangiferae sp. nov., and Asterina neomangiferae nom. nov

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Mycological Progress Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This article has been updated

Abstract

Asterinales is an important epifoliar order which generally lacks of DNA-based sequence data. There are many genera in Asterinales lacking molecular data and the exact taxonomic placement of those genera is undetermined. In this study, we introduce Brunneofissuraceae fam. nov. and Cirsosia mangiferae sp. nov. and Asterina neomangiferae nom. nov. based on morpho-molecular evidences. All fungal specimens were collected during September (2020) from Chiang Mai, Thailand. The phylogenetic analysis based on 28s (LSU) and 5.8s (ITS) sequence data confirmed the placements of Asterolibertia, Brunneofissura, and Cirsosia in Asterinales. We provide the first molecular data for Asterolibertia (current name is Asterina) and Cirsosia. Comparative morphologies and phylogenetic analyses are provided for each taxon using illustrations and well-supported phylogenetic analyses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.

Change history

  • 09 November 2023

    An incorrect ORCID details was mistakenly linked to Dr. Kevin D. Hyde. The ORCID details belong to another author with the same name but from a different field of work. The ORCID details has now been replaced with the correct one.

References

  • Arnaud G (1918) Les Astérinées. Annales de l’École Nationale d’Agriculture de Montpellier 16:1–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr ME (1976) Perspectives in the Ascomycotina. Mem New York Bot Gard 28:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Batista AC, Maia H (1960) Cirsosia Arnaud Cirsosina Bat. – novas espécies. Revista de Biologia Lisboa 2:115–136

  • Bezerra JL (2004) Taxonomia de ascomicetos: revisão da ordem Asterinales. Revista Anual de Patologia de Plantas 12:91–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai DQ, Tang LZ, Liu C et al (2018) Studies on Parmulariaceae I. A phylogeny based on available sequence data; introducing Parmulariales ord. nov., and Hemigraphaceae, Melaspileellaceae and Stictographaceae fam. nov. Phytotaxa 369:63–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dissanayake AJ, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Bhunjun CS, Liu JK (2020) Applied aspects of methods to infer phylogenetic relationships amongst fungi. Mycosphere 11:2653–2677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doidge EM (1942) A revision of South African Microthyriaceae. Bothalia 4:273–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Farr DF, Rossman AY (2020) Fungal Databases, U.S. National Fungus Collections, ARS, USDA. Available online: https://nt.arsgrin.gov/fungaldatabases/. Accessed 13 Jan 2021

  • Firmino AL, Inácio CA, Pereira OL et al (2016) Additions to the genera Asterolibertia and Cirsosia (Asterinaceae, Asterinales), with particular reference to species from the Brazilian Cerrado. IMA fungus 7:9–28

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Guatimosim E, Firmino AL, Bezerra JZ et al (2015) Towards a phylogenetic reappraisal of Parmulariaceae and Asterinaceae (Dothideomycetes). Persoonia 35:230–241

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hawksworth DL, Eriksson O (1986) The names of accepted orders of ascomycetes. Syst Ascomycetum 5:175–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 41:95–98

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hansford CG, Thirumalachar MJ (1948) Fungi of south India. Farlowia 3:285–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansford CG (1946) The foliicolous Ascomycetes, their parasites and associated fungi. Mycol Pap 15:1–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann TA (2010) Plant parasitc Asterinaceae and Microthyriaceae from the Neotropics (Panama), PhD thesis, The faculty of biological sciences at the J.W.Goethe-University Frankfurtam Main, Germany.

  • Hofmann TA, Piepenbring M (2014) New records of plant parasitic Asterinaceae (Dothideomycetes, Ascomycota) with intercalary appressoria from Central America and Panama. Trop Plant Pathol 39:419–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hongsanan S, Hyde KD, Phookamsak R et al (2020) Refined families of Dothideomycetes: orders and families incertae sedis in Dothideomycetes. Fungal Divers 105:17–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hongsanan S, Li YM, Liu JK et al (2014) Revision of genera in Asterinales. Fungal Divers 68:1–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hongsanan S, Sanchez-Ramırez S, Crous PW et al (2016) The evolution of fungal epiphytes. Mycosphere 7:1690–1712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosagoudar VB (2010) Notes on the genera Asterolibertia and Cirsosia (Fungi: Ascomycota). Journal of Threatened Taxa 2:1153–1157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosagoudar VB (2012) Asterinales of India. Mycosphere 2:617–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosagoudar VB, Dhivaharan V, Thiyagesan K et al (2010) Foliicolous fungi of Kodaikanal, Tamil Nadu, India. J Threatened Taxa 2:705–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosagoudar VB, Pillai M (1994) Two interesting Cirsosia species on Calamus from India. Mycol Res 98:127–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosagoudar VB, Thomas J, Agarwal DK et al (2011) Four new Asterinaceous members from Kerala, Imdia. Taprobanica:15–17

  • Hughes SJ (1952) Fungi from the Gold Coast. I. Mycol Pap 48:1–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde KD, Jeewon R, Chen YJ et al (2020) The numbers of fungi: is the descriptive curve flattening? Fungal Divers 103:219–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Index Fungorum (2021) http://www.indexfungorum.org/names/names.asp. Accessed 10 Jan 2021

  • Jayasiri SC, Hyde KD, Abd-Elsalam KA et al (2015) The Facesoffungi database: fungal names linked with morphology, molecular and human attributes. Fungal Divers 74:18–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katoh K, Toh H (2010) Recent developments in the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program. Brief Bioinform 9:286–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larget B, Simon DL (1999) Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms for the Bayesian analysis of phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 16:750–759

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Renard L (2019) Interpreting fossils of fly-speck fungi using comparative anatomy and phylogenetics. University of British Columbia, Columbia, Doctoral disserta-tion

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu NG, Ariyawansa HA, Hyde KD et al (2016) Perspectives into the value of genera, families and orders in classification. Mycosphere 7:1649–1668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathew KL, Nair NN, Swapna S et al (2017) Cirsosia humboldtigena sp. nov. (Lembosiaceae, Ascomycetes) on Humboldtia vahliana from Kerala, India. Plant Pathol Quar 7:60–63

  • Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T et al (2010) Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. In Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), New Orleans, LA, USA, 14 November 2010:1–8.

  • Müller E, von Arx JA (1962) Die Gattungen der didymosporen Pyrenomyceten. BeiträgezurKryptogamenflora der Schweiz 11:1–922

    Google Scholar 

  • Pem D, Hongsanan S, Doilom M et al (2019) https://www.dothideomycetes.org: an online taxonomic resource for the classification, identification, and nomenclature of Dothideomycetes. Asian J Mycol 2:287–297

  • Rambaut A (2012) FigTree version 1.4.0. Available at http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree. Accessed 8 Jan 2021

  • Rannala B, Yang Z (1996) Probability distribution of molecular evolutionary trees: a new method of phylogenetic inference. J Mol Evol 43:304–311

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Renard L, Firmino AL, Pereira OL et al (2020) Character evolution of modern fly-speck fungi and implications for interpreting thyriothecial fossils. Am J Bot 107:1021–1040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds DR, Gilbert GS (2006) Epifoliar fungi from Panama. Cryptogam Mycol 27:249–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck J, Teslenko M et al (2011) Draft MrBayes version 3.2 manual: tutorials and model summaries 1–105.

  • Ronquist F, Teslenko M, Van Der Mark P et al (2012) MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol 61:539–542

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Samarakoon MC, Hyde KD, Hongsanan S et al (2019) Divergence time calibrations for ancient lineages of Ascomycota classification based on a modern review of estimations. Fungal Divers 96:285–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stamatakis A (2014) RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioin-formatics 30:1312–1313

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stamatakis A, Hoover P, Rougemont J et al (2008) A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web servers. Syst Biol 57:758–771

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Senanayake IC, Rathnayaka AR, Marasinghe DS et al (2020) Morphological approaches in studying fungi: collection, examination, isolation, sporulation and preservation. Mycosphere 11:2678–2754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Species Fungorum (2020) http://www.speciesfungorum.org/Names/Names.asp (Retrieved on 10 January 2021).

  • Tennakoon DS, Kuo CH, Maharachchikumbura SS et al (2021) Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to Celtis formosana, Ficus ampelas, F. septica, Macaranga tanarius and Morus australis leaf litter inhabiting microfungi. Fungal Divers 108:1–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thaung MM (1976) Some ascomycetes from Burma. Trans Br Mycol Soc 67:435–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wijayawardene NN, Hyde KD, Al-Ani LKT et al (2020) Outline of Fungi and fungus-like taxa. Mycosphere 11:1060–1456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng XY, Jeewon R, Hongsanan S et al (2020) Unravelling evolutionary relationships between epifoliar Meliolaceae and angiosperms. J Syst Evol

  • Zeng XY, Wu HX, Hongsanan S et al (2019) Taxonomy and the evolutionary history of Micropeltidaceae. Fungal Divers 97:393–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Kevin D. Hyde thanks Chiang Mai University for the award of Visiting Professor. Milan C. Samarakoon and Dr. Shaun Pennycook are thanked for valuable suggestions for nomenclatural advice. Diana S. Marasinghe also would like to thank the Mushroom Research Foundation (Thailand), Mae Fah Luang University, Shenzhen University, and Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering for supporting this research.

Funding

This research was funded by CAS President’s International Fellowship Initiative (PIFI) for funding his postdoctoral research (number 2021FYB0005), the Postdoctoral Fund from Human Resources and Social Security Bureau of Yunnan Province and the National Science Foundation of China and Chinese Academy of Sciences (grant no. 41761144055), National Natural Science Foundation of China for supporting the project number 31950410548 and 31851110759, CAS President’s International Fellowship Initiative (PIFI) under the following grant: 2018PC0006, Guangdong Provincial Department of Education (grant no. 2019KTSCX150), Impact of climate change on fungal diversity and biogeography in the Greater Mekong Sub region grant number: RDG6130001 and Mushroom Research Foundation (Thailand). Ning Xie would like to thank  National Key R&D Program of China (2021YFA0910800), Basic and Applied Basic Research Fund of Guangdong Province (2121A1515012166), Stability Support project for Universities in Shenzhen (20200812173625001) and Project of DEGP (2019KTSCX150) for funding this research, and also want to thank to qi Sun who work in Central Research Facilities, College of Life Sciences and Oceanography.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, D.S.M.; review, S.H., D.N.W., K.D.H., and S.B., supervision, S.H., S.B., and K.D.H.; funding acquisition, D.N.W., S.L., K.D.H., and N.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin D. Hyde.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Section Editor: Gerhard Rambold

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marasinghe, D.S., Hongsanan, S., Wanasinghe, D.N. et al. Morpho-molecular characterization of Brunneofissuraceae fam. nov., Cirsosia mangiferae sp. nov., and Asterina neomangiferae nom. nov. Mycol Progress 21, 279–295 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-021-01767-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-021-01767-9

Keywords

Navigation