Skip to main content

Comparing fungal richness and community composition in coarse woody debris in Central European beech forests under three types of management

Mycological Progress volume 13, pages 959–964 (2014)Cite this article

Abstract

Managing forests by selection cutting is a promising silvicultural technique for maintaining forest biodiversity. Despite the importance of fungi in decomposition and nutrient cycling in forest ecosystems, no study to date has investigated the effects of selection cutting on fungal communities, especially using a culture-independent molecular technique to assess more than just the species that are fruiting at the time of sampling. Based on operational taxonomic units (OTUs) found in coarse woody debris, we compared the richness and community composition of wood-inhabiting fungi from selection cutting, age-class, and unmanaged European beech-dominated forests. We found that fungal OTU richness in selection cutting and unmanaged forests was not significantly different (P > 0.05), but it was higher, in both cases, than that in the age-class forest (P = 0.0002). Fungal community composition was not significantly different among the three forest types (P > 0.05). Abundances of common, wood-inhabiting fungal OTUs in different forest types were significantly correlated: the highest and lowest correlations were found between unmanaged forests and selection cutting (ρ = 0.52, P < 0.0001, n = 94), and between unmanaged and age-class forests (ρ = 0.30, P = 0.0080, n = 79), respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Baldrian P, Kolařík M, Štursová M et al (2012) Active and total microbial communities in forest soil are largely different and highly stratified during decomposition. ISME J 6:248–258

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunet J, Fritz Ö, Richnau G (2010) Biodiversity in European beech forests—a review with recommendations for sustainable forest management. Ecol Bull 53:77–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Echeverría C, Newton AC, Lara A, Rey-Benayas JM, Coomes D (2007) Impacts of forest fragmentation on species composition and forest structure in the temperate landscape of southern Chile. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 16:426–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer M, Bossdorf O, Gockel S et al (2010) Implementing large-scale and long-term functional biodiversity research: the Biodiversity Exploratories. Basic Appl Ecol 11:473–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukasawa Y, Tateno O, Hagiwara Y, Hirose D, Osono T (2012) Fungal succession and decomposition of beech cupule litter. Ecol Res 27(4):735–743

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardes M, Bruns TD (1993) ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes—application for the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol Ecol 2:113–118

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleeson DB, Clipson N, Melville K, Gadd GM, McDermott FP (2005) Characterization of fungal community structure on a weathered pegmatitic granite. Microb Ecol 50:360–368

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gossner MM, Lachat T, Brunet J, Isacsson G, Bouget C, Brustel H, Brandl R, Weisser WW, Müller J (2013) Current near-to-nature forest management effects on functional trait composition of saproxylic beetles in beech forests. Conserv Biol 27:605–614

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green JL, Holmes AJ, Westoby M, Oliver I, Briscoe D, Dangerfield M, Gillings M, Beattie AJ (2004) Spatial scaling of microbial eukaryote diversity. Nature 432:747–750

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001) PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Paleontol Electron 4

  • Heilmann-Clausen J, Christensen M (2003) Fungal diversity on decaying beech logs—implications for sustainable forestry. Biodivers Conserv 12:953–973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heilmann-Clausen J, Christensen M (2004) Does size matter? On the importance of various dead wood fractions for fungal diversity in Danish beech forests. For Ecol Manag 201:105–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hessenmöller D, Nieschulze J, Seele C, von Lüpke N, Schulze ED (2011) Identification of forest management types from ground-based and remotely sensed variables and the effects of forest management on forest structure and composition. Forstarchiv 82:171–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones SE, Shade A, McMahon KD, Kent AD (2007) Comparison of primer sets for use in automated ribosomal internal spacer analysis of aquatic bacterial communities: an ecological perspective. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:659–662

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Josefsson T, Olsson J, Östlund L (2010) Linking forest history and conservation efforts: effects of logging on forest structure and diversity of wood-inhabiting fungi. Biol Conserv 143:1803–1811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahl T, Mund M, Bauhus J, Schulze ED (2012) Dissolved organic carbon from European beech logs: patterns of input to and retention by surface soil. Ecoscience 19:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Küffer N, Gillet F, Senn-Irlet B, Job D, Aragno M (2008) Ecological determinants of fungal diversity on dead wood in European forests. Fungal Divers 30:83–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Légaré JP, Hébert C, Ruel JC (2011) Alternative silvicultural practices in irregular boreal forests: response of beetle assemblages. Silva Fenn 45:937–956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luyssaert S, Hessenmöller D, von Lupke N, Kaiser S, Schulze ED (2011) Quantifying land use and disturbance intensity in forestry, based on the self-thinning relationship. Ecol Appl 21:3272–3284

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma S, Concilio A, Oakley B, North M, Chen J (2010) Spatial variability in microclimate in a mixed-conifer forest before and after thinning and burning treatments. For Ecol Manag 259:904–915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manter DK, Vivanco JM (2007) Use of the ITS primers, ITS1f and ITS4, to characterize fungal abundance and diversity in mixed-template samples by qPCR and length heterogeneity analysis. J Microbiol Methods 71:7–14

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller J, Engel H, Blaschke M (2007) Assemblages of wood-inhabiting fungi related to silvicultural management intensity in beech forests in southern Germany. Eur J Forest Res 126:513–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Using S, Bartsch N (2009) Decay dynamic of coarse and fine woody debris of a beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) forest in Central Germany. Eur J Forest Res 128:287–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naether A, Foesel BU, Naegele V et al (2012) Environmental factors affect acidobacterial communities below the subgroup level in grassland and forest soils. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:7398–7406

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osono T, Tateno O, Masuya H (2013) Diversity and ubiquity of xylariaceous endophytes in live and dead leaves of temperate forest trees. Mycoscience 54:54–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pardini R, Marquez de Souza S, Braga-Neto R, Metzger JP (2005) The role of forest structure, fragments size and corridors in maintaining small mammal abundance and diversity in an Atlantic forest landscape. Biol Conserv 124:253–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purahong W, Hyde KD (2011) Effects of fungal endophytes on grass and non-grass litter decomposition rates. Fungal Divers 47:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purahong W, Krüger D (2012) A better understanding of functional roles of fungi in the decomposition process: using precursor rRNA containing ITS regions as a marker for the active fungal community. Ann For Sci 69:659–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purahong W, Hoppe B, Kahl T, Schloter M, Schulze E-D, Bauhus J, Buscot F, Krüger D (2013) Changes within a single land-use category alter microbial diversity and community structure: molecular evidence from wood-inhabiting fungi in forest ecosystems, unpublished

  • Ramette A (2009) Quantitative community fingerprinting methods for estimating the abundance of operational taxonomic units in natural microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:2495–2505

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranjard L, Poly F, Lata JC, Mougel C, Thioulouse J, Nazaret S (2001) Characterization of bacterial and fungal soil communities by automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis fingerprints: biological and methodological variability. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:4479–4487

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren-hui Q, Han C, Li-xin Z (2006) Effects of selection cutting on the forest structure and species diversity of evergreen broad-leaved forest in northern Fujian, southern China. For Stud China 8:16–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Thakuira D, Schmidt O, Finan D, Egan D, Doohan FM (2010) Gut wall bacteria of earthworms: a natural selection process. ISME J 4:357–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torras O, Saura S (2008) Effects of silvicultural treatments on forest biodiversity indicators in the Mediterranean. For Ecol Manag 255:3322–3330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkinson SC, Bebber D, Darrah P, Fricker M, Tlalka M, Boddy L (2006) The role of wood decay fungi in the carbon and nitrogen dynamics of the forest floor. In: Gadd GM (ed) Fungi in biogeochemical cycles. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 151–181

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Weig A, Peršoh D, Werner S, Betzlbacher A, Rambold G (2013) Diagnostic assessment of mycodiversity in environmental samples by fungal ITS1 rDNA length polymorphism. Mycol Prog. doi:10.1007/s11557-012-0883-1

    Google Scholar 

  • White TJ, Bruns TD, Lee S, Taylor J (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal DNA genes for phylogenies. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (eds) PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 315–322

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Our work was funded in part by contributing projects to the DFG Priority Program 1374 on “Infrastructure-Biodiversity-Exploratories” (KR 3587/1-1, KR 3587/3-2, BA 2821/9-2). We thank the managers of the three exploratories, Swen Renner, Sonja Gockel, Kerstin Wiesner, and Martin Gorke, for their work in maintaining the plot and project infrastructure; Simone Pfeiffer and Christiane Fischer for providing support through the central office; Michael Owonibi for managing the central data base; and Markus Fischer, Eduard Linsenmair, Dominik Hessenmöller, Jens Nieschulze, Daniel Prati, Ingo Schöning, Ernst-Detlef Schulze, Wolfgang W. Weisser and the late Elisabeth Kalko for their role in setting up the Biodiversity Exploratories project. We thank Björn Hoppe for F-ARISA setup; and Peter Otto, Renate Rudloff, Tobias Arnstadt, Kristin Baber, Kezia Goldmann and Beatrix Schnabel for their valuable field and/or laboratory assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Soil Ecology, UFZ-Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Theodor-Lieser-Str. 4, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany

    Witoon Purahong, François Buscot & Dirk Krüger

  2. Technical University of Munich, Chair for Soil Science, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85758, Oberschleissheim, Germany

    Witoon Purahong

  3. Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources, Chair of Silviculture, University of Freiburg, Tennenbacherstr. 4, 79085, Freiburg i. Brsg., Germany

    Tiemo Kahl & Jürgen Bauhus

  4. Research Unit for Environmental Genomics, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85758, Oberschleissheim, Germany

    Michael Schloter

  5. Institute of Biology, University of Leipzig, Johannisallee 21-23, 04103, Leipzig, Germany

    François Buscot

  6. German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Deutscher Platz 5e, 04103, Leipzig, Germany

    François Buscot

Authors
  1. Witoon Purahong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tiemo Kahl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michael Schloter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jürgen Bauhus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. François Buscot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Dirk Krüger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Witoon Purahong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Purahong, W., Kahl, T., Schloter, M. et al. Comparing fungal richness and community composition in coarse woody debris in Central European beech forests under three types of management. Mycol Progress 13, 959–964 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-013-0954-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-013-0954-y

Keywords

  • Fungal diversity
  • Silviculture
  • Forest management
  • F-ARISA
  • Culture-independent molecular method