Advertisement

Mycological Progress

, Volume 3, Issue 4, pp 329–336 | Cite as

Selection of Grifola frondosa and Fomitopsis pinicola strains resistant to Trichoderma viride in teflon tubes confrontation method

  • Isabelle Schiff Giovannini
  • Daniel JobEmail author
  • Abdelaziz Hmamda
Article

Abstract

The aim of this study was to select fast growing strains able to resist Trichoderma viride in a short-time experiment to be realized with a concurrently performed fruiting experiment. The test was realized in Teflon® tubes. Five strains of Grifola frondosa (Dicks: Fr.) Gray and five strains of Fomitopsis pinicola (Swartz: Fr.) Karst. were used as test organisms. Different factors that can influencing substrate invasion rate and resistance to T. viride were analyzed: substrate composition, quantity of substrate included in the tubes and colony size of the tested strain at the time of the inoculation of the pest.

Results sometimes showed great variations in behavior between strains, but also for a given strain growing on different substrates, indicating the importance of trophic factors in the resistance capacity. We also showed that substrate quantity and colony size can modify the capacity to resist. However there was no correlation between growth rate on agar-malt medium, substrate invasion rate, resistance to T. viride and fruiting capacity, showing the importance to test these different factors to select the best strains which can be further recombined.

Keywords

Growth Rate Trichoderma Colony Size Test Organism Trophic Factor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adachi K, Nanba M, Otsuka M, Kuroda H (1988) Blood pressure lowering activity present in the fruit body of Grifola frondosa (maitake). — Chemical & Pharmaceutical Bulletin (Tokyo) 36: 1000–1006.Google Scholar
  2. Atsuyuki K N, Nanba H (2002) Effect of maitake (Grifola frondosa) D-Fraction on the control of the T lymph node Th-1/Th-2 proportion. — Biological & Pharmaceutical Bulletin 25: 536–540.Google Scholar
  3. Badham E R (1991) Growth and competition between Lentinus edodes and Trichoderma harzianum on sawdust substrates. — Mycologia 83: 455–463.Google Scholar
  4. Delmas J (1989) Les champignons et leur culture. Ed.: Flammarion, Paris.Google Scholar
  5. Diorio L, Forchiassin F, Papinutti VL, Sueldo DV (2003). Degradation of fignocellulosic wastes by Saccobolus saccoboloides. — Revista Iberoamericana de Micologia 20: 11–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Elad Y, Chet I, Henis Y (1982) Degradation of plant pathogenic fungi by Trichoderma harzianum. — Canadian Journal of Microbiology 28: 719–725.Google Scholar
  7. Goltapeh EM, Danesh YR (2000) Studies on interaction between Trichoderma species and Agaricus bisporus mycelium. In Van Griensven (ed.) Science and Cultivation of Edible Fungi, pp 661–666. Balkema, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
  8. Hiroyuki H, Masaru O (2001) Maitake (Grifola frondosa) improves glucose tolerance of experimental diabetic rats. — Journal of Nutritional Science & Vitaminology 47: 57–63.Google Scholar
  9. Job D, Rachenberg M (1988). Experimental wood-rot of Salix humboldtiana blocks by species of Phellinus. — Material und organismen 23: 21–29.Google Scholar
  10. Job D, Schiff Giovannini I (2004). Influence of strain and substrate formulation of culinary-medicinal maitake mushroom Grifola frondosa (Dicks.:Fr.) S.F.Gray (Aphyllophoromycetideae) on fruit body production. — International Journal of Medicinal Mushrooms 6: 73–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Keller AC, Maillard MP, Hostettmann K (1996) Antimicrobial steroids from the fungus Fomitopsis pinicola. — Phytochemistry 41:1041–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kodama K, Kiyoshi K, Norio S, Nanba H (2002) Effects of D-Fraction, a polysaccharide from Grifola frondosa on tumor growth involve activation of NK cells. — Biological & Pharmaceutical Bulletin 25: 1647–1650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kubo K, Nanba H (1997) Anti-hyperliposis effect of maitake fruit body (Grifola frondosa). — Biological & Pharmaceutical Bulletin 20: 781–5.Google Scholar
  14. Kurushima H, Kodama N, Nanba H (2000) Activities of polysaccharides obtained from Grifola frondosa on insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus induced by streptozotocin in mice. — Mycoscience 41: 473–480.Google Scholar
  15. Lee E. W, He P, Kawagishi H, Sugiyama K (2000) Suppression of D-galactosamine-induced liver injury by mushrooms in rats. — Bioscience Biotechnology & Biochemistry 64: 2001–2004.Google Scholar
  16. Mao T, Van de Water J, Keen CL, Stern JS, Hackman R, Gershwin ME (1999) Two mushrooms, Grifola frondosa and Ganoderm lucidum, can stimulate cytokine gene expression and proliferation in human T lymphocytes. — International Journal of Immunotherapy 15: 13–22.Google Scholar
  17. Mata G, Savoie JM (1998) Extracellular enzymes activities in six Lentinula edodes strains during cultivation in wheat straw. — World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 14: 513–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mayell M (2001) Maitake extracts and their therapeutic potential. — Alternative Medicine Review 6: 48–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Nakai R, Masui H, Horio H, Ohtsuru M (1999) Effects of maitake (Grifola frondosa) water extract on inhibition of adipocyte-conversion of C3H10T1/2B2C1 cells. — Journal of Nutritional Science and Vitaminology 45: 385–389.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Nanba H, Kodama N, Schar D, Turner D (2000) Effects of Maitake (Grifola frondosa) glucan in HIV-infected patients. — Mycoscience 41: 293–295.Google Scholar
  21. Samuels GJ (1996) Trichoderma: a review of biology and systematic of the genus. — Mycological Research 100: 923–935.Google Scholar
  22. Savoie JM, Delpech P, Billette C, Mata G (2000) Inoculum adaptation changes the outcome of the competition between Lentinula edodes and Trichoderma spp. during shiitake cultivation on pasteurized wheat straw. In Van Griensven (ed.) Science and Cultivation of Edible Fungi, pp 667–674. Balkema, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
  23. Schirmböck M, Lorito M, Wang YL, Arisan-Atac I, Scala F, Kubicek CP (1994) Parallel formation and synergism of hydrolytic enzymes and peptaibol antibiotics, molecular mechanisms involved in the antagonisms action of Trichoderma harzianum against phytopathogenic fungi. — Applied and Environmental Microbiology 140: 626–629.Google Scholar
  24. Sterner O, Bergman R, Kihlberg J, Wickberg B (1985) The sesquiterpenes of Lactarius vellereus and their role in a proposed chemical defence system. — Journal of Natural Products 48: 279–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Suzuki I, Itani T, Ohno N, Oikawa S, Sato K, Miyazaki T, Yadomae T (1985) Effects of a polysaccharide fraction from Grifola frondosa on immune response in mice. — Journal of Pharmacobio-dynamics 8: 217–26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Tokimoto K, Komatsu M (1979) Effect of carbon and nitrogen sources in media on the hyphal interference between Lentinus edodes and Some Species of Trichoderma. — Annals of the Phytopathological Society of Japan 45: 261–264.Google Scholar
  27. Tokimoto K, Komatsu M (1995) Selection and breeding of shiitake strains resistant to Trichoderma spp. — Canadian Journal of Botany 73(Suppl. 1): S962–S966.Google Scholar
  28. Tokimoto K, Komatsu M, Fukumasa-Nakai Y (1994) Establishing the Selection Method for the Lentinula edodes Strains Resistant to Trichoderma spp. Proceedings of the Japan Academy 70, Ser B: 112–116.Google Scholar
  29. Worrall J (1997) Somatic incompatibility in Basidiomycetes. — Mycologia 89: 24–36.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© DGfM 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Isabelle Schiff Giovannini
    • 1
  • Daniel Job
    • 1
    Email author
  • Abdelaziz Hmamda
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire de MicrobiologieUniversité de NeuchâtelNeuchâtelSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations