Advertisement

Journal of Real-Time Image Processing

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 429–457 | Cite as

On the design of optimal 2D filters for efficient hardware implementations of image processing algorithms by using power-of-two terms

  • Alain HoréEmail author
  • Orly Yadid-Pecht
Original Research Paper
  • 155 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, we present a general approximation for 2D filters by using only power-of-two terms. This enables to easily implement these filters in electronic devices such as FPGA and ASIC just by using simple hardware shifters and adders/subtractors. Consequently, no division and no multiplication operators are required, which can reduce the memory and the power needed for computing operations such as convolution. Instead of using only additions and power-of-two terms for representing a number like in the standard binary decomposition, our model also uses subtractions for representing and approximating numbers. In addition, we propose a binary tree structure for computing a minimal representation in power-of-two terms in such a way that hardware shifters used for performing a convolution with a low-pass filter for example are well reduced to their minimum. Based on some experiments performed for contrast enhancement, which is a common image processing operation, we have noticed that good results can be obtained using our approximation in terms of image quality, hardware resources, and power consumption when compared to some other binary representations.

Keywords

Number representation Multipliers Logical shift operators FPGA 2D filters Image processing Contrast enhancement Minimal representation Binary tree 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The completion of this research was made possible thanks to the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and the Alberta Informatics Circle of Research Excellence (iCORE)/Alberta Innovates—Technology Futures (AITF).

References

  1. 1.
    Acharya, K.A., Babu, R.V., Vadhiyar, S.S.: A real-time implementation of SIFT using GPU. J. Real-Time Image Proc. (2014). doi: 10.1007/s11554-014-0446-6 Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wong, T.S., Bouman, C.A., Pollak, I.: Image enhancement using the hypothesis selection filter: theory and application to JPEG decoding. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 22(3), 898–913 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barina, D., Zemcik, P.: Vectorization and parallelization of 2-D wavelet lifting. J. Real-Time Image Proc. (2015). doi: 10.1007/s11554-015-0486-6 Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ofili, C.A., Glozman, S., Yadid-Pecht, O.: Hardware implementation of an automatic rendering tone mapping algorithm for wide dynamic range display. J. Low Power Electron. Appl. 3(4), 337–367 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tsai, C.Y.: A fast dynamic range compression with local contrast preservation algorithm and its application to real-time video enhancement. IEEE Trans. Multimed. 14(4), 1140–1152 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yu, W.W.H., Xing, S.: Fixed-point multiplier evaluation and design with FPGA. In: Proceedings of SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering, vol. 3844, pp. 153–161 (1999)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kuang, S.R., Wang, J.P.: Design of power-efficient configurable Booth multiplier. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. 57(3), 568–580 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen, J., Chang, C.H., Feng, F., Ding, W., Ding, J.: Novel design algorithm for low complexity programmable FIR filters based on extended double base number system. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I Regul. Pap. 62(1), 224–233 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Baudin, R., Lesthievent, G.: Design of FIR filters with sum of power-of-two representation using simulated annealing. In: 7th Advanced Satellite Multimedia Systems Conference and the 13th Signal Processing for Space Communications Workshop (ASMS/SPSC), pp. 339–345 (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kang, H.-J., Park, I.-C.: FIR filter synthesis algorithms for minimizing the delay and the number of adders. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II Analog Digit. Signal Proc. 48(8), 770–777 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Petrlik, J., Sekanina, L.: Multiobjective evolution of approximate multiple constant multipliers. In: IEEE International Symposium on Design and Diagnostics of Electronic Circuits and Systems (DDECS), pp. 116–119 (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hsiao, P.Y., Chen, C.H., Chou, S.S., Li, L.T., Chen, S.J.: A parameterizable digital-approximated 2D Gaussian smoothing filter for edge detection in noisy image. In: IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, pp. 3189–3192 (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chiu, C.T., Wang, T.H., Ke, W.M., Chuang, C.Y., Huang, J.S., Wong, W.S., Tsay, R.S., Wu, C.J.: Real-time tone-mapping processor with integrated photographic and gradient compression using 0.13 µm technology on an Arm Soc platform. J. Signal Proc. Syst. 64(1), 93–107 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gustafsson, O.: Lower bounds for constant multiplication problems. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II 54(11), 974–978 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Parhami, B.: Generalized signed-digit number systems: a unifying framework for redundant number representations. IEEE Trans. Comput. 39(1), 89–98 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sawada, J.: A simple gray code to list all minimal signed binary representations. SIAM J. Discrete Math. 21(1), 16–25 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wu, T., Zhang, M., Du, H.Q., Wang, R.B.: On optimal binary signed digit representations of integers. Appl. Math. A J. Chin Univ. 25(3), 331–340 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ebeid, N., Hasan, M.A.: On binary signed digit representations of integers. Des. Codes Crypt. 42(1), 43–65 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Guo, Z., Xu, W., Chai, Z.: Image edge detection based on FPGA. In: International Symposium on Distributed Computing and Applications to Business Engineering and Science, pp. 169–171 (2010)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C., Sheikh, H.R., Simoncelli, E.P.: Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 13(4), 600–612 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Horé, A., Ziou, D.: Image quality metrics: PSNR vs. SSIM. In: International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), pp. 2366–2369 (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Integrated Intelligent Sensing Laboratory (I2Sense), Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Schulich School of EngineeringUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations