Implanted passive engineering mechanism improves hand function after tendon transfer surgery: a cadaver-based study
- 234 Downloads
The purpose of this study was to investigate if a new tendon transfer surgical procedure that uses an implanted passive engineering mechanism for attaching multiple tendons to a single donor muscle in place of directly suturing the tendons to the muscle improves hand function in physical interaction tasks such as grasping.
The tendon transfer surgery for high median ulnar palsy was used as an exemplar, where all four flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) tendons are directly sutured to the extensor carpi radialis longus (ECRL) muscle to restore flexion. The new procedure used a passive hierarchical artificial pulley system to connect the muscle to the tendons. Both the suture-based and pulley-based procedures were conducted on N = 6 cadaver hands. The fingers’ ability to close around four objects when the ECRL tendon was pulled was tested. Post-surgery hand function was evaluated based on the actuation force required to create a grasp and the slip between the fingers and the object after the grasp was created.
When compared with the suture-based procedure, the pulley-based procedure (i) reduced the actuation force required to close all four fingers around the object by 45 % and (ii) improved the fingers’ individual adaptation to the object’s shape during the grasping process and reduced slip by 52 % after object contact (2.99° ± 0.28° versus 6.22° ± 0.66°).
The cadaver study showed that the implanted engineering mechanism for attaching multiple tendons to one muscle significantly improved hand function in grasping tasks when compared with the current procedure.
KeywordsTendon transfer surgery High median ulnar palsy Implant Engineering mechanism
A special thanks to the Institute for Simulation and Interprofessional Studies at UW Medicine for their support during the cadaver experiments, Sarani Chatterjee for aiding in the data processing, and Dr. Cliff Pereira for the statistical guidance. Drs. Joseph McGuire, Brian Bay, and Buddy Ratner also provided advice for the project.
Conflict of Interest
Katherine L. Mardula states that she has no conflict of interest in conducting this research.
Christopher H. Allan states that he received a grant from the army and money from Oregon State University for conducting this research (please see complete COI statement).
Ravi Balasubramanian states that he has no conflict of interest in conducting this research.
Statement of Human and Animal Rights
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.
Statement of Informed Consent
This is to state that no human subjects were used in the conduct of the experiment described in the paper titled “Implanted Passive Engineering Mechanism Improves Hand Function After Tendon-Transfer Surgery: A Cadaver-Based Study.”
- 1.Balasubramanian R, Montgomery J, Mardula KL, et al. Implanted miniature engineering mechanisms in tendon-transfer surgery improve robustness of post-surgery hand function. Hamlyn Symp Med Robot. 2013.Google Scholar
- 2.Beaton DE, Davis AM, Hudak P, et al. The DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand) outcome measure: what do we know about it now? Br J Hand Ther. 2001;6(4):109–18.Google Scholar
- 3.Bennett DJ, Hollerbach JM, Xu Y, et al. Time-varying stiffness of human elbow joint during cyclic voluntary movement. 1992; 88:433–442.Google Scholar
- 4.Birglen L, Lalibert’e T, Gosselin C. Underactuated robotic hands. Springer, 2008.Google Scholar
- 5.Bookman A, Harrington M, Pass L, et al. Family caregiver handbook. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2007.Google Scholar
- 6.Bosse M, Ficke JR. Extremity war injuries V: barriers to return of function and duty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011.Google Scholar
- 7.Brand PW, Hollister A. Clinical mechanics of the hand. 2nd ed. Mosby Year Book Inc.; 1993.Google Scholar
- 8.Bullock IM, Dollar AM. Classifying human manipulation behavior. In: 2011 I.E. international conference on rehabilitation robotics (ICORR). Switzerland, EHT Surich Science City; 2011.Google Scholar
- 14.Friden J, Lieber R. Tendon transfer surgery: clinical implications of experimental studies. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002; 403S(S163-S170).Google Scholar
- 15.Green DP, Hotchkiss RN, Pederson WC, et al. Green’s operative hand surgery, volume 1. 2. fifth ed. Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2005.Google Scholar
- 17.Hunter Implants. Ortotech. http://www.ortotech.c.
- 18.Labview. National Instruments. http://www.ni.com/labvie.
- 23.OptiTrack. Natural point. http://www.naturalpoint.com/optitrac.
- 26.Sepienza A, Green S. Correction of the claw hand. Hand Clin. 2012; 28(1).Google Scholar
- 27.Strickland JW, Graham TJ. The hand: master techniques in orthopedic surgery. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005.Google Scholar
- 28.Su BW, Solomans M, Barrow A, et al. A device for zone II flexor tendon repair. J BoneJoint Surg [AM]. 2006;88-A(Supplement 1):37–49.Google Scholar
- 29.Wikipedia. Differential mechanisms. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Differential.