Advertisement

HAND

, Volume 7, Issue 3, pp 297–302 | Cite as

Expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase in muscle flaps treated with ischemic postconditioning

  • Mei Yang
  • Michael F. Angel
  • Yi Pang
  • John J. Angel
  • Zhe Wang
  • Michael W. Neumeister
  • Nathan Wetter
  • Feng ZhangEmail author
Therapy Articles

Abstract

Background/Objective

Preconditioning has been considered promising for the treatment of ischemic flaps. In this study, the therapeutic effect of postconditioning was compared with that of preconditioning during ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury, and a role of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) in postconditioning treatment was also explored.

Methods

Sixty rats were randomly divided into four groups with 15 rats in each group. Ischemic injury was induced in a rat’s gracilis muscle flap model. Preconditioning and postconditioning were performed respectively on the flaps in the pre-con group and the post-con group. No treatment was given to the flaps in the control group, and flaps without I/R injury were used as a sham control. Muscle viability ratio, histology, and gene expression of iNOS were examined at different time intervals (3, 12, and 18 h).

Results

A significantly higher survival ratio was observed in both the pre-con group (78.98 ± 3.39, 62.74 ± 3.7, and 54.42 ± 4.45 %) and the post-con group (77.42 ± 4.14, 59.74 ± 6.67, and 49.52 ± 4.13 %) than the control group (45.22 ± 3.69, 42.44 ± 3.76, and 33.2 ± 3.29 %) at 3, 12, and 18 h postoperatively (P < 0.05). There was no statistical difference between the pre-con group and the post-con group (P > 0.05). Histological examination showed delayed and attenuated tissue damage in both the pre-con group and the post-con group when compared to that of the control group. A higher expression of iNOS was observed in both the pre-con group and the post-con group than the control group and the sham group (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Significant improvement of flap survival could be achieved by both preconditioning and postconditioning treatments; however, better protection could be provided by preconditioning. The higher expression of iNOS may play an important role in the therapeutic effect of postconditioning during I/R injury.

Keywords

Ischemic postconditioning Ischemic preconditioning Ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury Inducible nitric oxide synthase 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Professor Zhengwei Cai for his guidance in the process of this experimental study.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

References

  1. 1.
    Avci G, Akan M, Akoz T, Kuzon W, Gul AE. A pedicled muscle flap based solely on a neural pedicle. Microsurgery. 2009;29:218–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Contaldo C, Harder Y, Plock J, et al. The influence of local and systemic preconditioning on oxygenation, metabolism and survival in critically ischaemic skin flaps in pigs. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007;60:1182–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Die J, Wang K, Fan L, Jiang Y, Shi Z. Rosuvastatin preconditioning provides neuroprotection against spinal cord ischemia in rats through modulating nitric oxide synthase expressions. Brain Res. 2010;1346:251–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dikici MB, Coskunfirat OK, Uslu A. Effect of cyclooxygenase-2 on ischemic preconditioning of skin flaps. Ann Plast Surg. 2009;63:100–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kane AJ, Barker JE, Mitchell GM, et al. Inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) activity promotes ischaemic skin flap survival. Br J Pharmacol. 2001;132:1631–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lineaweaver WC, Buncke HJ, Whitney TM, et al. Factors associated with microvascular flap failure anddirection for research. Plast Surg Forum. 1989;12:252–3.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Moon JG, Lim HC, Gye MR, Oh JS, Park JW. Postconditioning attenuates ischemia–reperfusion injury in rat skin flap. Microsurgery. 2008;28:531–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mounsey RA, Pang CY, Forrest C. Preconditioning: a new technique for improved muscle flap survival. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1992;107:549–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Novakovic D, Patel RS, Goldstein DP, Gullane PJ. Salvage of failed free flaps used in head and neck reconstruction. Head Neck Oncol. 2009;21(1):33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Raphael J, Gozal Y, Navot N, Zuo Z. Hyperglycemia inhibits anesthetic-induced postconditioning in the rabbit heart via modulation of phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase/Akt and endothelial nitric oxide synthase signaling. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2010;55:348–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sung YH, Lee SH, Sung JK, et al. Preconditioning of isoflurane on spinal cord ischemia can increase the number of inducible nitric oxide synthase-expressing motor neurons in rat. Kor J Anesthesiol. 2010;58:70–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tawa M, Fukumoto T, Ohkita M, et al. Contribution of nitric oxide in big endothelin-1-induced cardioprotective effects on ischemia/reperfusion injury in rat hearts. J CardiovascPharmacol 2011 Feb 12.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Topp SG, Zhang F, Chatterjee T, et al. Role of nitric oxide in surgical flap survival. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;201:628–39.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tsang A, Hausenloy DJ, Yellon DM. Myocardial postconditioning: reperfusion injury revisited. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2005;289:H2–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vinten-Johansen J, Zhao ZQ, Jiang R, Zatta AJ, Dobson GP. Preconditioning and postconditioning: innate cardioprotection from ischemia–reperfusion injury. J Appl Physiol. 2007;103:1441–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang WZ. Investigation of reperfusion injury and ischemic preconditioning in microsurgery. Microsurgery. 2009;29:72–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Xin P, Zhu W, Li J, et al. Combined local ischemic postconditioning and remote preconditioning recapitulate cardioprotective effects of local ischemic preconditioning. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2010;298:H1819–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Xiong J, Wang Q, Xue FS, et al. Comparison of cardioprotective and anti-inflammatory effects of ischemia pre- and postconditioning in rats with myocardial ischemia–reperfusion injury. Inflamm Res. 2011;60(6):547–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yan H, Zhang F, Kochevar AJ, Akdemir O, Gao W, Angel M. The effect of postconditioning on the muscle flap survival after ischemia–reperfusion injury in rats. J Invest Surg. 2010;23:249–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yang XM, Liu Y, Liu Y, et al. Attenuation of infarction in cynomolgus monkeys: preconditioning and postconditioning. Basic Res Cardiol. 2010;105:119–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yang M, Sheng L, Li H, Weng R, Li QF. Improvement of the skin flap survival with the bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells transplantation in a rat model. Microsurgery. 2010;30:275–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhao ZQ, Corvera JS, Halkos ME, et al. Inhibition of myocardial injury by ischemic postconditioning during reperfusion: comparison with ischemic preconditioning. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003;285:H579–88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhao HX, Wang XL, Wang YH, et al. Attenuation of myocardial injury by postconditioning: role of hypoxia inducible factor-1alpha. Basic Res Cardiol. 2010;105:109–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Association for Hand Surgery 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mei Yang
    • 1
  • Michael F. Angel
    • 2
  • Yi Pang
    • 2
  • John J. Angel
    • 2
  • Zhe Wang
    • 2
  • Michael W. Neumeister
    • 1
  • Nathan Wetter
    • 1
  • Feng Zhang
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Division of Plastic SurgerySouthern Illinois University School of MedicineSpringfieldUSA
  2. 2.Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of SurgeryUniversity of Mississippi Medical CenterJacksonUSA

Personalised recommendations