Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Predictors of missed appointments in prospective hand surgery research

  • Surgery Articles
  • Published:
HAND

Abstract

Background

Missed research appointments may bias the outcome of prospective clinical trials if the participants that miss appointments differ in important ways from those that do not. The purpose of this study was to determine the predictors of missed research appointments in patients enrolled in clinical trials.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated 665 participants enrolled in ten prospective clinical trials conducted at our outpatient office between 2001 and 2010. Demographic data (sex, race, date of birth, date of enrollment, age at enrollment, educational level, and work status), study coordinator, and study type were analyzed for association with missed a research appointment in bivariate and multiple logistic regression analyses.

Results

One hundred and forty-four (21.7 %) participants missed research appointments during their follow-up. There were no statistical differences between those who missed appointments and those who did not, regarding sex, race, and age at enrollment. Educational level and work status were independent predictors of missed appointments.

Conclusions

This study suggests that educational level and work status are predictors of missed appointments in prospective clinical research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Claus RE, Kindleberger LR, Dugan MC. Predictors of attrition in a longitudinal study of substance abusers. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2002;34(1):69–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. de Graaf R, Bijl RV, Smit F, et al. Psychiatric and sociodemographic predictors of attrition in a longitudinal study: The Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study (NEMESIS). Am J Epidemiol. 2000;152:1039–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Neuner B, Fleming M, Born R, et al. Predictors of loss to follow-up in young patients with minor trauma after screening and written intervention for alcohol in an urban emergency department. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2007;68(1):133–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pelisse M, Barasso R. The follow-up of anogenital warts in a specialized consultation: study of patients lost to follow-up. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2003;130(11):1003–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Thomas MC, Walker M, Lennon LT, et al. Non-attendance at re-examination 20 years after screening in the British Regional Heart Study. J Public Health Med. 2002;24:285–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. van Amelsvoort LG, Beurskens AJ, Kant I, Swaen GM. The effect of non-random loss to follow-up on group means estimates in a longitudinal study. Eur J Epidemiol. 2004;19:15–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

No funds were received in support of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Ring.

About this article

Cite this article

Ootes, D., Buijze, G.A. & Ring, D. Predictors of missed appointments in prospective hand surgery research. HAND 7, 177–180 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-012-9411-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-012-9411-7

Keywords

Navigation