Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Wrong site surgery—where are we and what is the next step?

  • Correspondence and Brief Communications
  • Published:
HAND

Abstract

Background

Wrong site surgery is estimated to occur 40 times per week in hospitals and clinics in USA. The universal protocol was implemented by the joint commission board of commissioners to address wrong site, wrong procedure, and wrong person surgery.

Discussion

The universal protocol has three principal components: preoperative verification, marking of the operative site, and a time-out. Despite this organized approach to this problem, current data do not demonstrate any progress. In fact some data suggest that the problem may be getting worse. It is apparent that a process relying on surgeon and surgical team memory is doomed to ultimate failure. Recommendations are made for a more in depth checklist process based on the recommendations of the World Health Organization, reports in the literature of known areas of weakness in the current process, and personal experience in hopes of establishing a more bullet proof system to avoid wrong site procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Minnesota Department of Health. Adverse health events in Minnesota: 7th Annual Public Report, January 2011, can be accessed at http://www.health.state.mn.us/patientsafety/ae/2011ahereport.pdf

  2. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Advisory statement: wrong-side surgery. (American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeon’s website). October 2003. Available at: www.aaos.org/about/papers/advistmt/1015.asp

  3. Boodman SG. The pain of wrong site surgery. Washington Post June 20, 2011. http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/the-pain-of-wrong-site-surgery/2011/06/07/AGK3uLdH_story.html

  4. Clarke JR, Johnson J, Fennelly ED. Getting surgery right. Ann Surg. 2007;246(3):395–405.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. De Vries EN, Prins HA, Crolla RM, Den Outer AJ, et al. Effects of comprehensive surgical safety system on patient outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(20):1928–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Giles SJ, Rhodes P, Clements G, Cook GA, Hayton R, Maxwell MJ, Sheldon TA, Wright J. Experience of wrong-site surgery and surgical marking practices among clinicians in the UK. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15(5):363–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, et al. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(5):491–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jhawar BS, Mitsis D, Duggal N. Wrong-site and wrong-level neurosurgery: a national survey. J Neuro Surg Spine. 2007;7(5):467–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mears SC, Davani AB, Belkoff SM. Does the type of skin marker prevent marking erasure of the surgical site markings. Surgery: Open Access Journal of Plastic; 2009. p. 342–6.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Meinberg EG, Stern PJ. Incidents of wrong-site surgery amount hand surgeons. J Bone Joint Surg AM. 2003;85:193–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Minnesota Patient Safety Alert June 22, 2010, Appendix F safety alert. Ceorole Minnesota Department of Health

  12. Neily J, Mills PD, Young-Xu Y, Carney BT, West P, Berger DH, Mazzia LM, Baull DE, Bagian JP. Association between implementation of medical team training program and surgical mortality. JAMA. 2010;304(15):1693–700.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Panesar SS, Nobel JD, Mirza SB, et al. Can a surgical check list reduce the risk of wrong site surgery in orthopaedics? Can a check list help? Supporting evidence from analysis of a national patient incident reporting system. J Orthopaedic Surg Related. 2011;6:18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ring DC, Herndon JH, Mayer GS. Case 34-2010-65-year-old woman with an incorrect operation on the left hand. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1950–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Robinson PM, Nuir LT. Wrong-site surgery in orthopaedics. J Bone Joint Surg (BR). 2009;91(10):1274–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Seiden SC, Barach P. Wrong-side/wrong-site, wrong-procedure and wrong-patient adverse events: are they preventable? Arch Surg. 2006;141(9):931–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. The Joint Commission. Facts about the Universal Protocol. January 2011. http://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/18/Universal%20Protocol%201%204%20111.PDF. Accessed December 6, 2011.

  18. Wright PH, Burnaby BC. Committee on Orthopaedic Practice and Economics (COPE), position paper on wrong sided surgery in orthopaedics (Canadian Orthopaedic Association website). Available at: http://www.coa-aco.org/library/health-policy/wrong-sided-surgery-in-orthopaedics.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Orthopaedic Specialists, PC, 3385 Dexter Court, Davenport, IA, 52807, USA

    Tyson K. Cobb

Authors
  1. Tyson K. Cobb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tyson K. Cobb.

Additional information

A mentor and friend, William Pederson, MD, credits his father for this bit of wisdom. “Experience is a masterful teacher and a fool learns by no other.”

About this article

Cite this article

Cobb, T.K. Wrong site surgery—where are we and what is the next step?. HAND 7, 229–232 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-012-9405-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-012-9405-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation