Skip to main content
Log in

A fully automatic fiducial detection and correspondence establishing method for online C-arm calibration

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Online C-arm calibration with a mobile fiducial cage plays an essential role in various image-guided interventions. However, it is challenging to develop a fully automatic approach, which requires not only an accurate detection of fiducial projections but also a robust 2D–3D correspondence establishment.

Methods

We propose a novel approach for online C-arm calibration with a mobile fiducial cage. Specifically, a novel mobile calibration cage embedded with 16 fiducials is designed, where the fiducials are arranged to form 4 line patterns with different cross-ratios. Then, an auto-context-based detection network (ADNet) is proposed to perform an accurate and robust detection of 2D projections of those fiducials in acquired C-arm images. Subsequently, we present a cross-ratio consistency-based 2D–3D correspondence establishing method to automatically match the detected 2D fiducial projections with those 3D fiducials, allowing for an accurate online C-arm calibration.

Results

We designed and conducted comprehensive experiments to evaluate the proposed approach. For automatic detection of 2D fiducial projections, the proposed ADNet achieved a mean point-to-point distance of \(0.65 \pm 1.33\) pixels. Additionally, the proposed C-arm calibration approach achieved a mean re-projection error of \(1.01 \pm 0.63\) pixels and a mean point-to-line distance of \(0.22 \pm 0.12\) mm. When the proposed C-arm calibration approach was applied to downstream tasks involving landmark and surface model reconstruction, sub-millimeter accuracy was achieved.

Conclusion

In summary, we developed a novel approach for online C-arm calibration. Both qualitative and quantitative results of comprehensive experiments demonstrated the accuracy and robustness of the proposed approach. Our approach holds potentials for various image-guided interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bertelsen A, Garin-Muga A, Echeverría M, Gómez E, Borro D (2014) Distortion correction and calibration of intra-operative spine X-ray images using a constrained DLT algorithm. Comput Med Imaging Graph 38(7):558–568

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Li S, Du Z, Yu H (2020) A robot-assisted spine surgery system based on intraoperative 2D fluoroscopy navigation. IEEE Access 8:51786–51802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jia F, Li Y, Xu H, Zhang X, Hu Q (2012) A simple method to calibrate projection matrix of C-arm cone-beam CT. In: 2012 International conference on biomedical engineering and biotechnology. IEEE, pp 682–685

  4. Rai L, Gibbs JD, Wibowo H (2012) A C-arm calibration method with application to fluoroscopic image-guided procedures. In: Medical imaging 2012: image-guided procedures, robotic interventions, and modeling, vol 8316. SPIE, pp 665–675

  5. Zheng G, Zhang X (2009) Robust automatic detection and removal of fiducial projections in fluoroscopy images: an integrated solution. Med Eng Phys 31(5):571–580

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schumann S, Dong X, Puls M, Nolte L-P, Zheng G (2012) Calibration of C-arm for orthopedic interventions via statistical model-based distortion correction and robust phantom detection. In: 2012 9th IEEE international symposium on biomedical imaging (ISBI). IEEE, pp 1204–1207

  7. Schumann S, Thelen B, Ballestra S, Nolte L-P, Büchler P, Zheng G (2014) X-ray image calibration and its application to clinical orthopedics. Med Eng Phys 36(7):968–974

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sato K, Ohnishi T, Sekine M, Haneishi H (2017) Geometry calibration between x-ray source and detector for tomosynthesis with a portable x-ray system. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 12:707–717

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Lemammer I, Michel O, Ayasso H, Zozor S, Bernard G (2020) Online mobile C-arm calibration using inertial sensors: a preliminary study in order to achieve CBCT. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 15(2):213–224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ji X, Lu Y, Zhuo X, Zhang Y, Zhu S, Chen Y (2023) A geometrical calibration method for C-arm CT based on a non-linear registration model. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 72:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  11. Livyatan H, Yaniv Z, Joskowicz L (2002) Robust automatic C-arm calibration for fluoroscopy-based navigation: a practical approach. In: International conference on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention. Springer, pp 60–68

  12. Cheriet F, Laporte C, Kadoury S, Labelle H, Dansereau J (2007) A novel system for the 3-D reconstruction of the human spine and rib cage from biplanar X-ray images. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 54(7):1356–1358

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Esfandiari H, Newell R, Anglin C, Street J, Hodgson AJ (2018) A deep learning framework for segmentation and pose estimation of pedicle screw implants based on C-arm fluoroscopy. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 13:1269–1282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mostafavi H, Sloutsky A, Jeung A (2012) Detection and localization of radiotherapy targets by template matching. In: 2012 annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society. IEEE, pp 6023–6027

  15. Fang F, Liu Y, Yao J, Li Y, Xie R (2013) Automatic marker detection from x-ray images. In: 2013 IEEE international conference on robotics and biomimetics (ROBIO). IEEE, pp 1689–1694

  16. Jiang Y, Wang H, Liu H (2017) A robust fiducial mark extraction method in x-ray image based on hog operator. In: 2017 IEEE 2nd advanced information technology, electronic and automation control conference (IAEAC). IEEE, pp 591–595

  17. Hartley R, Zisserman A (2003) Multiple view geometry in computer vision. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mohr R, Triggs B (1996) Projective geometry for image analysis. In: XVIIIth international symposium on photogrammetry and remote sensing (ISPRS’96)

  19. Akritas AG, Malaschonok GI (2004) Applications of singular-value decomposition (SVD). Math Comput Simul 67(1):15–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Guo N, Yang B, Wang Y, Liu H, Hu L, Wang T (2019) New calibrator with points distributed conical helically for online calibration of C-arm. Sensors 19(9):1989

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Cao Z, Simon T, Wei S-E, Sheikh Y (2017) Realtime multi-person 2D pose estimation using part affinity fields. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 7291–7299

  22. Payer C, Štern D, Bischof H, Urschler M (2019) Integrating spatial configuration into heatmap regression based CNNs for landmark localization. Med Image Anal 54:207–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hartley RI, Sturm P (1997) Triangulation. Comput Vis Image Underst 68(2):146–157

  24. Sun W, Zhao Y, Liu J, Zheng G (2023) LatentPCN: latent space-constrained point cloud network for reconstruction of 3D patient-specific bone surface models from calibrated biplanar X-ray images. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 1–11

  25. Livyatan H, Yaniv Z, Joskowicz L (2003) Gradient-based 2-D/3-D rigid registration of fluoroscopic X-ray to CT. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 22(11):1395–1406

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guoyan Zheng.

Ethics declarations

Fundings

This research was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U20A20199).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

This article does not contain patient data.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, W., Zou, X. & Zheng, G. A fully automatic fiducial detection and correspondence establishing method for online C-arm calibration. Int J CARS (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-024-03162-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-024-03162-7

Keywords

Navigation