Abstract
Purpose
Bone biopsies are currently conducted under computed tomography (CT) guidance using a battery-powered drill to obtain tissue samples for diagnosis of suspicious bone lesions. However, this procedure is suboptimal as images produced under CT lack soft tissue discrimination and involve ionizing radiation. Therefore, our team developed an MRI-safe pneumatic drill to translate this clinical workflow into the MR environment, which can improve target visualization and eliminate radiation exposure. We compare drill times and quality of samples between the 2 drills using animal bones.
Methods
Five porcine spare rib bones were obtained from a butcher shop. Each bone was drilled twice using the Arrow OnControl battery-powered drill and twice using our pneumatically actuated drill. For this study, we used an 11-gauge bone biopsy needle set with an internal core capturing thread. A stopwatch recorded the overall time of drilling for each specimen obtained.
Results
All 20 samples collected contained a high-quality inner core and cortex. The total average time for drilling with the pneumatic drill was 8.5 s (+ / − 2.5 s) and 7.1 s (+ / − 1.4 s) with the standard battery-powered drill.
Conclusion
Both drills worked well and were able to obtain comparable specimens. The pneumatic drill took slightly longer, 1.39 s on average, but this extra time would not be significant in clinical practice. We plan to use the pneumatic drill to enable MRI-safe bone biopsy for musculoskeletal lesions. Biopsy under MRI would provide excellent lesion visualization with no ionizing radiation.
References
Key Statisics About Bone Cancer (2023) American Cancer Society. https://www.cancer.org/cancer/types/bone-cancer/about/key-statistics.html
Self C, MacQuarrie K, Cost C (2022) Osteosarcoma/ewing sarcoma. Am Acad Pediatr 43(5):256–265. https://doi.org/10.1542/pir.2021-005065
Ferguson J, Turner S (2018) Bone cancer: diagnosis and treatment principles. Am Family Physician 98(4):205–213
Schnurr C, Pippan M, Stuetzer H, Delank K, Michael J, Peer E (2008) Treatment delay of bone tumors, compilation of a sociodemographic risk profile: a retrospective study. BMC Cancer 8:22. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-2-22
Pohlig F, Kichhoff C, Lenze U, Schauwecker J, Burgkart R, Renchl H, Eisenhart-Rothe R (2012) Percutaneous core needle biopsy versus open biopsy in diagnostics of bone and soft tissue sarcoma: a retrospective study. Eur J Med Res 17(1):29. https://doi.org/10.1186/2047-783X-17-29
Espinosa L, Jamadar D, Jacobson J, DeMaeseneer M, Ebrahim F, Sabb B, Kretschmer M, Biermann J, Kim S (2008) CT-guided biopsy of bone: a radiologist’s perspective. Am J Roentgenol 190:W283-289. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.3138
Badiola C, Scappaticci F, Brahaj D (2012) CT guided bone marrow aspiration and core biopsy. Open J Radiol 2:55–56. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojrad.2012.22010
Huh E, Yi P, Ray D, Hsu L, Hui F, Khan M (2020) Comparison of powered drill & manual bone biopsy systems: does the diagnostic yield justify the cost? J Clin Neurosci 74:125–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2020.01.004
Carrino J, Khurana B, Ready J, Silverman S, Winalski C (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging-guided percutaneous biopsy of musculoskeletal lesions. J Bone Joint Surg 10:2179–2187. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.F.01230
Lim S, Sharma K, Li P, Petrisor D, Fricke S, Stoianovici D, Cleary K (2018) Robotically assisted long bone biopsy under MRI: cadaver study results. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 14(1):147–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-018-1889-1
Neuerburg J, Adam G, Bücker A et al (1998) A new MR-(and CT-) compatible bone biopsy system: first clinical results. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nukl 169(5):515–520. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1015330
Ahrar K, Sabir S, Yevich S, Sheth R, Ahrar J, Tam A, Stafford J (2018) MRI-Guided interventions in musculoskeletal system. Top Magn Reson Imaging 27(3):129–139. https://doi.org/10.1097/RMR.0000000000000151
Güttler F, Winterwerber K, Heinrich A, Teichgraber U (2012) Development of a pneumatic x-ray transparent and MR-safe bone drilling system for interventional MRI. Biomed Eng Biomed Tech 57:1. https://doi.org/10.1515/bmt-2012-4200
Aria Drill System (2023) Stryker. https://neurosurgical.stryker.com/products/aria-drill/
Cohen M, McMahon C, Kung J, Wu J (2016) Comparison of battery-powered and manual bone biopsy systems for core needle biopsy of sclerotic bone lesions. Am J Roentgenol 206(5):W83–W86. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.15067
Sarangi S, Babbar S, Taneja D (2018) Safety of the medical gas pipeline system. J Anesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 34(1):99–102. https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_274_16
Arrow OnControl Powered Bone Lesion Biopsy System (2020) Teleflex. https://oncontrolsystem.com/bone-lesion-biopsies/
Garnon J, Ramamurthy N, Caudrelier J, Erceg G, Breton E, Tsoumakidou G, Rao P, Gangi A (2016) MRI-guided percutaneous biopsy of mediastinal masses using a large bore magnet: technical feasibility. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 39:761–767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-015-1246-5
Acknowledgements
This study is supported by the project “Pneumatic Drill and Robot for MRI-Guided Pediatrics Long Bone Biopsy” funded by NIH (Project No. 1R01CA248191-01). Responsibility for the content of this publication lies with the authors. A poster and short communication regarding an adjacent study that featured this drill was published in the SPIE 2023 Conference Proceedings.
Funding
National Cancer Institute (5R01CA248191-03).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the study and research belong to our research team.
Ethical approval
No ethical approval was needed for this study.
Informed consent
There is no informed consent as the study does not involve human subjects.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fischer, E., Gebremeskel, M., Stoianovici, D. et al. A novel pneumatic drill for bone biopsy under MRI imaging. Int J CARS 19, 405–409 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-023-03042-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-023-03042-6