Skip to main content
Log in

A novel pneumatic drill for bone biopsy under MRI imaging

  • Short communication
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Bone biopsies are currently conducted under computed tomography (CT) guidance using a battery-powered drill to obtain tissue samples for diagnosis of suspicious bone lesions. However, this procedure is suboptimal as images produced under CT lack soft tissue discrimination and involve ionizing radiation. Therefore, our team developed an MRI-safe pneumatic drill to translate this clinical workflow into the MR environment, which can improve target visualization and eliminate radiation exposure. We compare drill times and quality of samples between the 2 drills using animal bones.

Methods

Five porcine spare rib bones were obtained from a butcher shop. Each bone was drilled twice using the Arrow OnControl battery-powered drill and twice using our pneumatically actuated drill. For this study, we used an 11-gauge bone biopsy needle set with an internal core capturing thread. A stopwatch recorded the overall time of drilling for each specimen obtained.

Results

All 20 samples collected contained a high-quality inner core and cortex. The total average time for drilling with the pneumatic drill was 8.5 s (+ / − 2.5 s) and 7.1 s (+ / − 1.4 s) with the standard battery-powered drill.

Conclusion

Both drills worked well and were able to obtain comparable specimens. The pneumatic drill took slightly longer, 1.39 s on average, but this extra time would not be significant in clinical practice. We plan to use the pneumatic drill to enable MRI-safe bone biopsy for musculoskeletal lesions. Biopsy under MRI would provide excellent lesion visualization with no ionizing radiation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Key Statisics About Bone Cancer (2023) American Cancer Society. https://www.cancer.org/cancer/types/bone-cancer/about/key-statistics.html

  2. Self C, MacQuarrie K, Cost C (2022) Osteosarcoma/ewing sarcoma. Am Acad Pediatr 43(5):256–265. https://doi.org/10.1542/pir.2021-005065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ferguson J, Turner S (2018) Bone cancer: diagnosis and treatment principles. Am Family Physician 98(4):205–213

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schnurr C, Pippan M, Stuetzer H, Delank K, Michael J, Peer E (2008) Treatment delay of bone tumors, compilation of a sociodemographic risk profile: a retrospective study. BMC Cancer 8:22. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-2-22

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Pohlig F, Kichhoff C, Lenze U, Schauwecker J, Burgkart R, Renchl H, Eisenhart-Rothe R (2012) Percutaneous core needle biopsy versus open biopsy in diagnostics of bone and soft tissue sarcoma: a retrospective study. Eur J Med Res 17(1):29. https://doi.org/10.1186/2047-783X-17-29

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Espinosa L, Jamadar D, Jacobson J, DeMaeseneer M, Ebrahim F, Sabb B, Kretschmer M, Biermann J, Kim S (2008) CT-guided biopsy of bone: a radiologist’s perspective. Am J Roentgenol 190:W283-289. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.3138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Badiola C, Scappaticci F, Brahaj D (2012) CT guided bone marrow aspiration and core biopsy. Open J Radiol 2:55–56. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojrad.2012.22010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Huh E, Yi P, Ray D, Hsu L, Hui F, Khan M (2020) Comparison of powered drill & manual bone biopsy systems: does the diagnostic yield justify the cost? J Clin Neurosci 74:125–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2020.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Carrino J, Khurana B, Ready J, Silverman S, Winalski C (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging-guided percutaneous biopsy of musculoskeletal lesions. J Bone Joint Surg 10:2179–2187. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.F.01230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lim S, Sharma K, Li P, Petrisor D, Fricke S, Stoianovici D, Cleary K (2018) Robotically assisted long bone biopsy under MRI: cadaver study results. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 14(1):147–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-018-1889-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Neuerburg J, Adam G, Bücker A et al (1998) A new MR-(and CT-) compatible bone biopsy system: first clinical results. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nukl 169(5):515–520. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1015330

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ahrar K, Sabir S, Yevich S, Sheth R, Ahrar J, Tam A, Stafford J (2018) MRI-Guided interventions in musculoskeletal system. Top Magn Reson Imaging 27(3):129–139. https://doi.org/10.1097/RMR.0000000000000151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Güttler F, Winterwerber K, Heinrich A, Teichgraber U (2012) Development of a pneumatic x-ray transparent and MR-safe bone drilling system for interventional MRI. Biomed Eng Biomed Tech 57:1. https://doi.org/10.1515/bmt-2012-4200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Aria Drill System (2023) Stryker. https://neurosurgical.stryker.com/products/aria-drill/

  15. Cohen M, McMahon C, Kung J, Wu J (2016) Comparison of battery-powered and manual bone biopsy systems for core needle biopsy of sclerotic bone lesions. Am J Roentgenol 206(5):W83–W86. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.15067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sarangi S, Babbar S, Taneja D (2018) Safety of the medical gas pipeline system. J Anesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 34(1):99–102. https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_274_16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Arrow OnControl Powered Bone Lesion Biopsy System (2020) Teleflex. https://oncontrolsystem.com/bone-lesion-biopsies/

  18. Garnon J, Ramamurthy N, Caudrelier J, Erceg G, Breton E, Tsoumakidou G, Rao P, Gangi A (2016) MRI-guided percutaneous biopsy of mediastinal masses using a large bore magnet: technical feasibility. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 39:761–767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-015-1246-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is supported by the project “Pneumatic Drill and Robot for MRI-Guided Pediatrics Long Bone Biopsy” funded by NIH (Project No. 1R01CA248191-01). Responsibility for the content of this publication lies with the authors. A poster and short communication regarding an adjacent study that featured this drill was published in the SPIE 2023 Conference Proceedings.

Funding

National Cancer Institute (5R01CA248191-03).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth Fischer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the study and research belong to our research team.

Ethical approval

No ethical approval was needed for this study.

Informed consent

There is no informed consent as the study does not involve human subjects.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fischer, E., Gebremeskel, M., Stoianovici, D. et al. A novel pneumatic drill for bone biopsy under MRI imaging. Int J CARS 19, 405–409 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-023-03042-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-023-03042-6

Keywords

Navigation