Abstract
Purpose
There is growing evidence for the use of augmented reality (AR) navigation in spinal surgery to increase surgical accuracy and improve clinical outcomes. Recent research has employed AR techniques to create accurate auto-segmentations, the basis of patient registration, using reduced radiation dose intraoperative computed tomography images. In this study, we aimed to determine if spinal surgery AR applications can employ reduced radiation dose preoperative computed tomography (pCT) images.
Methods
We methodically decreased the imaging dose, with the addition of Gaussian noise, that was introduced into pCT images to determine the image quality threshold that was required for auto-segmentation. The Gaussian distribution’s standard deviation determined noise level, such that a scalar multiplier (L: [0.00, 0.45], with steps of 0.03) simulated lower doses as L increased. We then enhanced the images with denoising algorithms to evaluate the effect on the segmentation.
Results
The pCT radiation dose was decreased to below the current lowest clinical threshold and the resulting images produced segmentations that were appropriate for input into AR applications. This held true at simulated dose L = 0.06 (estimated 144 mAs) but not at L = 0.09 (estimated 136 mAs). The application of denoising algorithms to the images resulted in increased artifacts and decreased bone density.
Conclusions
The pCT image quality that is required for AR auto-segmentation is lower than that which is currently employed in spinal surgery. We recommend a reduced radiation dose protocol of approximately 140 mAs. This has the potential to reduce the radiation experienced by patients in comparison to procedures without AR support. Future research is required to identify the specific, clinically relevant radiation dose thresholds required for surgical navigation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The ground truth images that are modified are included in the figures.
Code availability
Code is available upon request.
References
Bydon M, Xu R, Amin AG et al (2014) Safety and efficacy of pedicle screw placement using intraoperative computed tomography: consecutive series of 1148 pedicle screws: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 21(3):320–328. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.5.SPINE13567
Tajsic T, Patel K, Farmer R, Mannion RJ, Trivedi RA (2018) Spinal navigation for minimally invasive thoracic and lumbosacral spine fixation: implications for radiation exposure, operative time, and accuracy of pedicle screw placement. Eur Spine J 27(8):1918–1924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5587-z
Van de Kelft E, Costa F, Van der Planken D, Schils F (2012) A prospective multicenter registry on the accuracy of pedicle screw placement in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral levels with the use of the o-arm imaging system and stealthstation navigation. Spine 37(25):E1580. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318271b1fa
Edström E, Burström G, Omar A et al (2020) Augmented reality surgical navigation in spine surgery to minimize staff radiation exposure. Spine 45(1):E45. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000003197
Meng XT, Guan XF, Zhang HL, He SS (2016) Computer navigation versus fluoroscopy-guided navigation for thoracic pedicle screw placement: a meta-analysis. Neurosurg Rev 39(3):385–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-015-0679-2
Tian NF, Huang QS, Zhou P et al (2011) Pedicle screw insertion accuracy with different assisted methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Eur Spine J 20(6):846–859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1577-5
Burström G, Persson O, Edström E, Elmi-Terander A (2021) Augmented reality navigation in spine surgery: a systematic review. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 163(3):843–852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-021-04708-3
Nachabe R, Strauss K, Schueler B, Bydon M (2019) Radiation dose and image quality comparison during spine surgery with two different, intraoperative 3D imaging navigation systems. J Appl Clin Med Phys 20(2):136–145. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12534
Yoo JS, Patel DS, Hrynewycz NM, Brundage TS, Singh K (2019) The utility of virtual reality and augmented reality in spine surgery. Ann Transl Med 7(Suppl 5):S171. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2019.06.38
Edström E, Burström G, Nachabe R, Gerdhem P, Elmi TA (2020) A novel augmented-reality-based surgical navigation system for spine surgery in a hybrid operating room: design, workflow, and clinical applications. Oper Neurosurg 18(5):496–502. https://doi.org/10.1093/ons/opz236
Carl B, Bopp M, Saß B, Voellger B, Nimsky C (2019) Implementation of augmented reality support in spine surgery. Eur Spine J 28(7):1697–1711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-05969-4
Elmi-Terander A, Burström G, Nachabe R et al (2019) Pedicle screw placement using augmented reality surgical navigation with intraoperative 3D imaging. Spine 44(7):517–525. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002876
Markelj P, Tomaževič D, Likar B, Pernuš F (2012) A review of 3D/2D registration methods for image-guided interventions. Med Image Anal 16(3):642–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2010.03.005
Mayo JR, Whittall KP, Leung AN et al (1997) Simulated dose reduction in conventional chest CT: validation study. Radiology 202(2):453–457. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.202.2.9015073
Liu J (2021) Remove JPEG noise via CNN on keras and tensorflow 2.0. Accessed 15 Nov 2021. https://github.com/jason71995/jpeg_denoise
Alshamari M, Geijer M, Norrman E, Geijer H (2014) Low-dose computed tomography of the lumbar spine: a phantom study on imaging parameters and image quality. Acta Radiol 55(7):824–832. https://doi.org/10.1177/0284185113509615
Koo B, Robu MR, Allam M et al (2021) Automatic, global registration in laparoscopic liver surgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-021-02518-7
Karimi D, Salcudean S (2019) Reducing the Hausdorff distance in medical image segmentation with convolutional neural networks. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 39(2):499–513. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2019.2930068
Malham GM, Munday NR (2021) Comparison of novel machine vision spinal image guidance system with existing 3D fluoroscopy-based navigation system: a randomized prospective study. Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2021.10.002
Yang CH, Wu TH, Chiou YY et al (2014) Imaging quality and diagnostic reliability of low-dose computed tomography lumbar spine for evaluating patients with spinal disorders. Spine J 14(11):2682–2690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2014.03.007
Manni F, Elmi-Terander A, Burström G et al (2020) Towards optical imaging for spine tracking without markers in navigated spine surgery. Sensors 20(13):3641. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20133641
Warncke ML, Wiese NJ, Tahir E et al (2020) Highly reduced-dose CT of the lumbar spine in a human cadaver model. PLoS ONE 15(10):e0240199. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240199
Mulkens TH, Marchal P, Daineffe S et al (2007) Comparison of low-dose with standard-dose multidetector CT in cervical spine trauma. Am J Neuroradiol 28(8):1444–1450. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A0608
Weinrich JM, Maas KJ, Starekova J et al (2019) Feasibility of submillisievert CT of the skeletal pelvis using iterative reconstruction: a human cadaver study. Am J Roentgenol 213(4):903–911. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.18.20933
Carl B, Bopp M, Saß B, Nimsky C (2019) Microscope-based augmented reality in degenerative spine surgery: initial experience. World Neurosurg 128:e541–e551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.04.192
Funding
Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Anand Veeravagu is a consultant for Surgical Theater; Tatiana Jansen is an employee of Surgical Theater.
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
All authors have given their consent for publication.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schonfeld, E., de Lotbiniere-Bassett, M., Jansen, T. et al. Vertebrae segmentation in reduced radiation CT imaging for augmented reality applications. Int J CARS 17, 775–783 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-022-02561-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-022-02561-y