Fiducial-based fusion of 3D dental models with magnetic resonance imaging

Original Article
  • 2 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is widely used in study of maxillofacial structures. While MRI is the modality of choice for soft tissues, it fails to capture hard tissues such as bone and teeth. Virtual dental models, acquired by optical 3D scanners, are becoming more accessible for dental practice and are starting to replace the conventional dental impressions. The goal of this research is to fuse the high-resolution 3D dental models with MRI to enhance the value of imaging for applications where detailed analysis of maxillofacial structures are needed such as patient examination, surgical planning, and modeling.

Methods

A subject-specific dental attachment was digitally designed and 3D printed based on the subject’s face width and dental anatomy. The attachment contained 19 semi-ellipsoidal concavities in predetermined positions where oil-based ellipsoidal fiducial markers were later placed. The MRI was acquired while the subject bit on the dental attachment. The spatial position of the center of mass of each fiducial in the resultant MR Image was calculated by averaging its voxels’ spatial coordinates. The rigid transformation to fuse dental models to MRI was calculated based on the least squares mapping of corresponding fiducials and solved via singular-value decomposition.

Results

The target registration error (TRE) of the proposed fusion process, calculated in a leave-one-fiducial-out fashion, was estimated at 0.49 mm. The results suggest that 6–9 fiducials suffice to achieve a TRE of equal to half the MRI voxel size.

Conclusion

Ellipsoidal oil-based fiducials produce distinguishable intensities in MRI and can be used as registration fiducials. The achieved accuracy of the proposed approach is sufficient to leverage the merged 3D dental models with the MRI data for a finer analysis of the maxillofacial structures where complete geometry models are needed.

Keywords

3D dental model Magnetic resonance imaging Oil-based fiducial Multi-modal fusion Fiducial-based registration Vitamin capsule 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr. David Tobias for his clinical assistance. This research was undertaken, in part, thanks to the funding from the Vanier Scholar award of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) (Grant No. 201511CGV-360245-271565) to Amir H. Abdi.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standard

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Abdi AH, Hannam AG, Stavness IK, Fels S (2017) Minimizing fiducial localization error using sphere-based registration in jaw tracking. J Biomech 68:120–125CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arun KS, Huang TS, Blostein SD (1987) Least-squares fitting of two 3-D point sets. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal 9(5):698–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barone S, Paoli A, Razionale AV (2013) Computer-aided modelling of three-dimensional maxillofacial tissues through multi-modal imaging. Proc Inst Mech Eng 227(2):89–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brüllmann D, Schulze RK (2015) Spatial resolution in CBCT machines for dental/maxillofacial applications—what do we know today? Dentomaxillofac Rad 44(1):20140204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gupta S, Patil N, Solanki J, Singh R, Laller S (2015) Oral implant imaging: a review. MJMS 22(3):7–17PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hack GD, Patzelt SBM (2015) Evaluation of the accuracy of six intraoral scanning devices: an in-vitro investigation. ADA Prof Prod Rev 10(4):1–5Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Idiyatullin D, Corum C, Moeller S, Prasad HS, Garwood M, Nixdorf DR (2011) Dental magnetic resonance imaging: making the invisible visible. J Endod 37(6):745–752CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ludwig U, Eisenbeiss AK, Scheifele C, Nelson K, Bock M, Hennig J, von Elverfeldt D, Herdt O, Flügge T, Hövener JB (2016) Dental MRI using wireless intraoral coils. Sci Rep 6(23):301Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Marques da Silva AM, Hoffmann EC, Link EG, Trombetta AB, Bacim F, Borges JA (2013) Three-dimensional virtual preoperative implant planning P3Dental using computed tomography images. Springer, Berlin, pp 916–919Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Oliveira FPM, Manuel J, Tavares RS (2014) Medical image registration: a review. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 17(10):73–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Renne W, Ludlow M, Fryml J, Schurch Z, Mennito A, Kessler R, Lauer A (2017) Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners: an invitro analysis based on 3-dimensional comparisons. J Prosthet Dent 118:36–42CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Traser L, Flügge TV, Burdumy M, Kamberger R, Richter B, Hassepass F, Korvink JG, Echternach M (2015) A comparison of different methods to generate tooth surface models without applying ionizing radiation for digital 3-dimensional image fusion with magnetic resonance imagingbased data of the head and neck region. J Comput Assist Tomogr 39(6):882–889CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ventura SR, Freitas DR, Ramos IM, Tavares JMRS (2012) Three-dimensional visualization of teeth by magnetic resonance imaging during speech. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on biodental engineering, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wittmann W, Wenger T, Zaminer B, Lueth TC (2011) Automatic correction of registration errors in surgical navigation systems. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 58(10):2922–2930CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yau HT, Yang TJ, Chen YC (2014) Tooth model reconstruction based upon data fusion for orthodontic treatment simulation. Comput Biol Med 48:8–16CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© CARS 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Electrical and Computer Engineering DepartmentUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  2. 2.Department of Oral Health Sciences, Faculty of DentistryUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations