Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Viewpoint planning for quantitative coronary angiography

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

In coronary angiography, the condition of myocardial blood supply is assessed by analyzing 2-D X-ray projections of contrasted coronary arteries. This is done using a flexible C-arm system. Due to the X-ray immanent dimensionality reduction projecting the 3-D scene onto a 2-D image, the viewpoint is critical to guarantee an appropriate view onto the affected artery and, thus, enable reliable diagnosis. In this work, we introduce an algorithm computing optimal viewpoints for the assessment of coronary arteries without the need for 3-D models.

Methods

We introduce the concept of optimal viewpoint planning solely based on a single angiographic X-ray image. The subsequent viewpoint is computed such that it is rotated precisely around a vessel, while minimizing foreshortening.

Results

Our algorithm reduces foreshortening substantially compared to the input view and completely eliminates it for \(90^{\circ }\) rotations. Rotations around isocentered foreshortening-free vessels passing the isocenter are exact. The precision, however, decreases when the vessel is off-centered or foreshortened. We evaluate worst-case boundaries, providing insight in the maximal inaccuracies to be expected. This can be utilized to design viewpoints guaranteeing desired requirements, e.g., a true rotation around the vessel of at minimum \(30^{\circ }\). In addition, a phantom study is performed investigating the impact of input views to 3-D quantitative coronary angiography (QCA).

Conclusion

We introduce an algorithm for optimal viewpoint planning from a single angiographic X-ray image. The quality of the second viewpoint—i.e., vessel foreshortening and true rotation around vessel—depends on the first viewpoint selected by the physician; however, our computed viewpoint is guaranteed to reduce the initial foreshortening. Our novel approach uses fluoroscopy images only and, thus, seamlessly integrates with the current clinical workflow for coronary assessment. In addition, it can be implemented in the QCA workflow without increasing user interaction, making vessel-shape reconstruction more stable by standardizing viewpoints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blinn J (1977) A homogeneous formulation for lines in 3 space. In Siggraph 1977, pp 237–241. Association for Computing Machinery, Inc

  2. Chrisriaens J, Walle R, Lemahieu I (2001) A simple determination system for optimal angiographic viewing. Conf Image Process 2:327–330

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chen S, Carroll J (2000) 3-D reconstruction of coronary arterial tree to optimize angiographic visualization. Tans Med Imaging 19(4):318–336

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Delaere D, Smets C, Suetens P, Marchal G, Van de Werf F (1991) Knowledge-based system for the three-dimensional reconstruction of blood vessels from two angiographic projections. MBEC 29(6):NS27–NS36

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fallavollita P, Winkler A, Habert S, Wucherer P, Stefan P, Mansour R, Ghotbi R, Navab N (2014) Desired-view controlled positioning of angiographic c-arms. In MICCAI, pp 659–666. Springer

  6. Garcia J, Movassaghi B, Casserly I, Klein A, Chen S, Messenger J, Hansgen A, Wink O, Groves B, Carroll J (2009) Determination of optimal viewing regions for X-ray coronary angiography based on a quantitative analysis of 3D reconstructed models. Cardiovasc Imaging 25(5):455–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Green N, Chen S, Hansgen A, Messenger J, Groves B, Carroll J (2005) Angiographic views used for percutaneous coronary interventions: a three-dimensional analysis of physician-determined vs. computer-generated views. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 64(4):451–459

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu I, Sun Y (1992) Fully automated reconstruction of three-dimensional vascular tree structures from two orthogonal views using computational algorithms and productionrules. Opt Eng 31(10):2197–2208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mozaffarian D, Benjamin E, Go A, Arnett D, Blaha M, Cushman M, Howard V (2015) Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics 2015 update. Circulation 131(4):434–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pellot C, Sigelle M, Horain P, Peronneau P (1994) A 3D reconstruction of vascular structures from two X-ray angiograms using an adapted simulated annealing algorithm. TMI 13(1):48–60

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sato Y, Araki T, Hanayama M, Naito H, Tamura S (1998) A viewpoint determination system for stenosis diagnosis and quantification in coronary angiographic image acquisition. TMI 17(1):121–37

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tu S, Koning G, Jukema W, Reiber JH (2010) Assessment of obstruction length and optimal viewing angle from biplane x-ray angiograms. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 26(1):5–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Unberath M, Taubmann O, Hell M, Achenbach S, Maier A (2017) Symmetry, outliers, and geodesics in coronary artery centerline reconstruction from rotational angiography. Medical Physics 44(11):5672–5685

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Virga S, Dogeanu V, Fallavollita P, Ghotbi R, Navab N, Demirci S (2015) Optimal c-arm positioning for aortic interventions. In BVM 2015, pp 53–58. Springer

  15. Wink O, Kemkers R, Chen S, Carroll JD (2002) Coronary intervention planning using hybrid 3d reconstruction. In MICCAI, pp 604–611. Springer

Download references

Acknowledgements

The concepts and information presented in this paper are based on research and are not commercially available.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Preuhs.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

S. Achenbach, M. Unberath and A. Maier have no conflict of interest. A. Preuhs is funded by Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Forchheim Germany. M. Berger, S. Bauer and T. Redel are employees of Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Forchheim Germany.

Informed consent

This article does not contain patient data.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Preuhs, A., Berger, M., Bauer, S. et al. Viewpoint planning for quantitative coronary angiography. Int J CARS 13, 1159–1167 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-018-1763-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-018-1763-1

Keywords

Navigation