A photon recycling approach to the denoising of ultra-low dose X-ray sequences
- 13 Downloads
Clinical procedures that make use of fluoroscopy may expose patients as well as the clinical staff (throughout their career) to non-negligible doses of radiation. The potential consequences of such exposures fall under two categories, namely stochastic (mostly cancer) and deterministic risks (skin injury). According to the “as low as reasonably achievable” principle, the radiation dose can be lowered only if the necessary image quality can be maintained.
Our work improves upon the existing patch-based denoising algorithms by utilizing a more sophisticated noise model to exploit non-local self-similarity better and this in turn improves the performance of low-rank approximation. The novelty of the proposed approach lies in its properly designed and parameterized noise model and the elimination of initial estimates. This reduces the computational cost significantly.
The algorithm has been evaluated on 500 clinical images (7 patients, 20 sequences, 3 clinical sites), taken at ultra-low dose levels, i.e. 50% of the standard low dose level, during electrophysiology procedures. An average improvement in the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) by a factor of around 3.5 has been found. This is associated with an image quality achieved at around 12 (square of 3.5) times the ultra-low dose level. Qualitative evaluation by X-ray image quality experts suggests that the method produces denoised images that comply with the required image quality criteria.
The results are consistent with the number of patches used, and they demonstrate that it is possible to use motion estimation techniques and “recycle” photons from previous frames to improve the image quality of the current frame. Our results are comparable in terms of CNR to Video Block Matching 3D—a state-of-the-art denoising method. But qualitative analysis by experts confirms that the denoised ultra-low dose X-ray images obtained using our method are more realistic with respect to appearance.
KeywordsSpatio-temporal denoising Ultra-low dose X-ray sequences Low-rank approximation
This work was supported by Siemens Healthcare GmbH. The concepts and results presented in this paper are based on research and not commercially available.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study formal consent is not required.
- 1.Albarqouni S, Baust M, Conjeti S, Al-Amoudi A, Navab N (2015) Multi-scale graph-based guided filter for de-noising cryo-electron tomographic data. In: BMVC, p 17-1Google Scholar
- 3.Boracchi G, Foi A (2008) Multiframe raw-data denoising based on block-matching and 3-d filtering for low-light imaging and stabilization. In: Proceedings of international workshop on local and non-local approximation in image processing, vol 1, pp 277–284Google Scholar
- 4.Buades A, Coll B, Morel JM (2005) A non-local algorithm for image denoising. In: Proceedings of IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, vol 2, pp 60–65. IEEEGoogle Scholar
- 9.Dabov K, Foi A, Katkovnik V, Egiazarian K (2009) Bm3d image denoising with shape-adaptive principal component analysis. In: Signal processing with adaptive sparse structured representationsGoogle Scholar
- 12.Goodman T (2010) Ionizing radiation effects and their risk to humans. Image wisely radiation safety in adult medical imaging. Disponível na internet a 22Google Scholar
- 14.Kostadin D, Alessandro F, KAREN E (2007) Video denoising by sparse 3d transform-domain collaborative filtering. In: European signal processing conference, vol 149Google Scholar
- 17.Lefkimmiatis S, Papandreou G, Maragos P (2008) Photon-limited image denoising by inference on multiscale models. In: Proceedings international conference on image processing, pp 2332–2335. IEEEGoogle Scholar
- 20.Parker DL, Clayton PD, Tarbox LR, Von Behren PL (1983) Optimal dose utilization with variable X-ray intensity in digital radiography. In: Application of optical instrumentation in medicine XI, pp 102–110. International Society for Optics and PhotonicsGoogle Scholar
- 21.Schmidt U, Roth S (2014) Shrinkage fields for effective image restoration. In: Proceedings of IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 2774–2781Google Scholar