Skip to main content

Can real-time RGBD enhance intraoperative Cone-Beam CT?

Abstract

Purpose

Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) is an important 3D imaging technology for orthopedic, trauma, radiotherapy guidance, angiography, and dental applications. The major limitation of CBCT is the poor image quality due to scattered radiation, truncation, and patient movement. In this work, we propose to incorporate information from a co-registered Red-Green-Blue-Depth (RGBD) sensor attached near the detector plane of the C-arm to improve the reconstruction quality, as well as correcting for undesired rigid patient movement.

Methods

Calibration of the RGBD and C-arm imaging devices is performed in two steps: (i) calibration of the RGBD sensor and the X-ray source using a multimodal checkerboard pattern, and (ii) calibration of the RGBD surface reconstruction to the CBCT volume. The patient surface is acquired during the CBCT scan and then used as prior information for the reconstruction using Maximum-Likelihood Expectation-Maximization. An RGBD-based simultaneous localization and mapping method is utilized to estimate the rigid patient movement during scanning.

Results

Performance is quantified and demonstrated using artificial data and bone phantoms with and without metal implants. Finally, we present movement-corrected CBCT reconstructions based on RGBD data on an animal specimen, where the average voxel intensity difference reduces from 0.157 without correction to 0.022 with correction.

Conclusion

This work investigated the advantages of a C-arm X-ray imaging system used with an attached RGBD sensor. The experiments show the benefits of the opto/X-ray imaging system in: (i) improving the quality of reconstruction by incorporating the surface information of the patient, reducing the streak artifacts as well as the number of required projections, and (ii) recovering the scanning trajectory for the reconstruction in the presence of undesired patient rigid movement.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Notes

  1. http://imfusion.de/products/imfusion-suite.

  2. Values reported as mean ± standard deviation.

References

  1. Andersen AH (1989) Algebraic reconstruction in CT from limited views. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 8(1):50–55

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Beister M, Kolditz D, Kalender WA (2012) Iterative reconstruction methods in X-ray CT. Phys Med 28(2):94–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bodensteiner C, Darolti C, Schumacher H, Matthäus L, Schweikard A (2007) Motion and positional error correction for cone beam 3D-reconstruction with mobile C-arms. In: Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention. Springer, Berlin, pp 177–185

  4. Endres F, Hess J, Engelhard N, Sturm J, Cremers D, Burgard W (2012) An evaluation of the rgb-d slam system. In: 2012 IEEE International conference on robotics and automation (ICRA). IEEE, pp 1691–1696

  5. Fischer M, Fuerst B, Lee SC, Fotouhi J, Habert S, Weidert S, Euler E, Osgood G, Navab N (2016) Preclinical usability study of multiple augmented reality concepts for K-wire placement. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 11(6):1007–1014. doi:10.1007/s11548-016-1363-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fotouhi J, Fuerst B, Johnson A, Taylor R, Osgood G, Navab N, Armand M (2017) Pose-aware c-arm for automatic re-initialization of interventional 2d/3d image registration. Accepted for presentation at IPCAI

  7. Fotouhi J, Fuerst B, Lee SC, Keicher M, Fischer M, Weidert S, Euler E, Navab N, Osgood G (2016) Interventional 3d augmented reality for orthopedic and trauma surgery. In: Meeting of the international society for computer assisted orthopedic surgery

  8. Fuerst B, Fotouhi J, Navab N (2015) Vision-based intraoperative cone-beam CT stitching for non-overlapping volumes. In: Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention. Springer, Berlin, pp 387–395

  9. Fuerst B, Mansi T, Carnis F, Slzle M, Boettger T, Bayouth J, Navab N, Kamen A (2015) Patient-specific biomechanical model for the prediction of lung motion from 4-D CT images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 34(2):599–607

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Geiger A, Moosmann F, Car, Ö., Schuster B (2012) Automatic camera and range sensor calibration using a single shot. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, pp 3936–3943

  11. Gordon R, Bender R, Herman GT (1970) Algebraic reconstruction techniques (art) for three-dimensional electron microscopy and x-ray photography. J Theor Biol 29(3):471–481

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hara AK, Paden RG, Silva AC, Kujak JL, Lawder HJ, Pavlicek W (2009) Iterative reconstruction technique for reducing body radiation dose at ct: feasibility study. Am J Roentgenol 193(3):764–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hwang HS, Chung MJ, Lee JW, Shin SW, Lee KS (2010) C-arm cone-beam CT-guided percutaneous transthoracic lung biopsy: usefulness in evaluation of small pulmonary nodules. Am J Roentgenol 195(6):W400–W407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kainz B, Grabner M, Rüther M (2008) Fast marker based c-arm pose estimation. In: International conference on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention. Springer, Berlin, pp 652–659

  15. Klein L (1990) Anesthetic complications in the horse. Vet Clin N Am Equine Pract 6(3):665–692

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lange K, Carson R (1984) Em reconstruction algorithms for emission and transmission tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 8(2):306–316

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee SC, Fuerst B, Fotouhi J, Fischer M, Osgood G, Navab N (2016) Calibration of RGBD camera and cone-beam CT for 3D intra-operative mixed reality visualization. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 11(6):967–975

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Navab N, Mitschke M, Schütz O (1999) Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention, pp 688–697

  19. Newcombe RA, Izadi S, Hilliges O, Molyneaux D, Kim D, Davison AJ, Kohi P, Shotton J, Hodges S, Fitzgibbon A (2011) KinectFusion: Real-time dense surface mapping and tracking. In: IEEE international symposium on mixed and augmented reality, pp 127–136

  20. Newcombe RA, Izadi S, Hilliges O, Molyneaux D, Kim D, Davison AJ, Kohi P, Shotton J, Hodges S, Fitzgibbon A (2011) Kinectfusion: Real-time dense surface mapping and tracking. In: IEEE international symposium on mixed and augmented reality. IEEE, pp 127–136

  21. Oehler M, Buzug T (2007) Statistical image reconstruction for inconsistent CT projection data. Methods Inf Med 46(3):261–269

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Orth RC, Wallace MJ, Kuo MD (2008) Technology assessment committee of the society of interventional radiology: C-arm cone-beam ct: general principles and technical considerations for use in interventional radiology. J Vasc Interv Radiol 19(6):814–820

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Otake Y, Armand M, Armiger RS, Kutzer MD, Basafa E, Kazanzides P, Taylor RH (2012) Intraoperative image-based multiview 2d/3d registration for image-guided orthopaedic surgery: incorporation of fiducial-based c-arm tracking and gpu-acceleration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 31(4):948–962

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ramamurthi K, Prince J (2003) Tomographic reconstruction for truncated cone beam data using prior CT information. In: Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention. Springer, Berlin, pp 134–141

  25. Rusu R, Blodow N, Beetz M (2009) Fast Point Feature Histograms for 3D registration. In: International conference on robotics and automation, pp 3212–3217

  26. Scherl H, Keck B, Kowarschik M, Hornegger J (2007) Fast GPU-based CT reconstruction using the common unified device architecture. In: Nuclear science symposium conference record, vol. 6. IEEE, pp 4464–4466

  27. Sidky EY, Pan X (2008) Image reconstruction in circular cone-beam computed tomography by constrained, total-variation minimization. Phys Med Biol 53(17):4777

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Smith R, Self M, Cheeseman P (1990) Estimating uncertain spatial relationships in robotics. In: Autonomous robot vehicles. Springer, Berlin, pp 167–193

  29. Tam A, Mohamed A, Pfister M, Rohm E, Wallace MJ (2009) C-arm cone beam computed tomographic needle path overlay for fluoroscopic-guided placement of translumbar central venous catheters. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 32(4):820–824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang Q, Hu YC, Liu F, Goodman K, Rosenzweig KE, Mageras GS (2010) Correction of motion artifacts in cone-beam ct using a patient-specific respiratory motion model. Med Phys 37(6):2901–2909

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang Z (2000) A flexible new technique for camera calibration. Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 22(11):1330–1334

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Gerhard Kleinzig and Sebastian Vogt from SIEMENS for their support and making a SIEMENS ARCADIS Orbic 3D available for this research.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Javad Fotouhi.

Ethics declarations

Funding

Research reported in this publication was partially supported by NIAMS of the National Institutes of Health under award number T32AR067708, by the Johns Hopkins-Coulter Translational Partnership, and by Johns Hopkins University internal funding sources.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors. This research does not qualify as human subjects research.

Additional information

J. Fotouhi and B. Fuerst contributed equally and should be considered joint first authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fotouhi, J., Fuerst, B., Wein, W. et al. Can real-time RGBD enhance intraoperative Cone-Beam CT?. Int J CARS 12, 1211–1219 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-017-1572-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-017-1572-y

Keywords

  • Cone-Beam CT
  • RGBD
  • Intraoperative
  • Tomographic reconstruction
  • MLEM
  • Algebraic reconstruction