Electromagnetically tracked personalized templates for surgical navigation
- 215 Downloads
An electromagnetic (EM) surgical tracking system was developed for orthopedic navigation. The reportedly poor accuracy of point-based EM navigation was improved by using anatomical impressions, which were EM-tracked personalized templates. Lines, rather than points, were consistently used for calibration and error evaluation.
Technical accuracy was tested using models derived from CT scans of ten cadaver shoulders. Tracked impressions were first designed, calibrated, and tested using lines as fiducial objects. Next, tracked impressions were tested against EM point-based navigation and optical point-based navigation, in environments that were either relatively empty or that included surgical instruments. Finally, a tracked impression was tested on a cadaver forearm in a simulated fracture-repair task.
Calibration of anatomical impressions to EM tracking was highly accurate, with mean fiducial localization errors in positions of 0.3 mm and in angles of \(0.6^\circ \). Technical accuracy on physical shoulder models was also highly accurate; in an EM field with surgical instruments, the mean of target registration errors in positions was 2.2 mm and in angles was \(3.7^\circ \). Preclinical accuracy in a cadaver forearm in positions was 0.4 mm and in angles was \(7.1^\circ \). The technical accuracy was significantly better than point-based navigation, whether by EM tracking or by optical tracking. The preclinical accuracy was comparable to that achieved by point-based optical navigation.
EM-tracked impressions—a hybrid of personalized templates and EM navigation—are a promising technology for orthopedic applications. The two technical contributions are the novel hybrid navigation and the consistent use of lines as fiducial objects, replacing traditional point-based computations. The accuracy improvement was attributed to the combination of physical surfaces and line directions in the processes of calibration and registration. The technical studies and preclinical trial suggest that EM-tracked impressions are an accurate, ergonomic innovation in image-guided orthopedic surgery.
KeywordsSurgical navigation Electromagnetic tracking Personalized templates Target registration error
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 7.Li JM, Bardana DD, Stewart AJ (2011) Augmented virtuality for arthroscopic knee surgery. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv LNCS 6891:186–193Google Scholar
- 8.Lugez E, Sadjadi H, Pichora DR, Ellis RE, Akl SG, Fichtinger G (2015) Electromagnetic tracking in surgical and interventional environments: usability study. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 10(3):253–262Google Scholar
- 10.Nijkamp J, Schermers B, Schmitz S, de Jonge S, Kuhlmann K, van der Heijden F, Sonke JJ, Ruers T (2016) Comparing position and orientation accuracy of different electromagnetic sensors for tracking during interventions. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 11(1):1–12. doi: 10.1007/s11548-015-1348-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar