Synchronized navigation of current and prior studies using image registration improves radiologist’s efficiency
The purpose of this study was to investigate how the use of multi-modal rigid image registration integrated within a standard picture archiving and communication system affects the efficiency of a radiologist while performing routine interpretations of cases including prior examinations.
Six radiologists were recruited to read a set of cases (either 16 neuroradiology or 14 musculoskeletal cases) during two crossover reading sessions. Each radiologist read each case twice, one time with synchronized navigation, which enables spatial synchronization across examinations from different study dates, and one time without. Efficiency was evaluated based upon time to read a case and amount of scrolling while browsing a case using Wilcoxon signed rank test.
Significant improvements in efficiency were found considering either all radiologists simultaneously, the two sections separately and the majority of individual radiologists for time to read and for amount of scrolling. The relative improvement for each individual radiologist ranged from 4 to 32% for time to read and from 14 to 38% for amount of scrolling.
Image registration providing synchronized navigation across examinations from different study dates provides a tool that enables radiologists to work more efficiently while reading cases with one or more prior examinations.
KeywordsEfficiency Image registration Synchronized navigation PACS
D. Forsberg is supported by a Grant (2014-01422) from the Swedish Innovation Agency (VINNOVA).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
D. Forsberg reports grants from VINNOVA and employment at Sectra (a PACS vendor), during the conduct of the study. The other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
No procedures involving human participants were performed as the study was a retrospective study. For this type of study formal consent is not required.
- 3.Roelofs AAJ, Karssemeijer N, Wedekind N, Beck C, van Woudenberg S, Snoeren PR, Hendriks JHCL, Rosselli del Turco M, Bjurstam N, Junkermann H, Beijerinck D, Séradour B, Evertsz CJG (2007) Importance of comparison of current and prior mammograms in breast cancer screening. Radiology 242:70–77CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.American College of Radiology. ACR practice parameter for communication of diagnostic image findings. Revised 2014 (Resolution 11). Retrieved from http://www.acr.org/~/media/ACR/Documents/PGTS/guidelines/Comm_Diag_Imaging.pdf
- 7.Lakhani P, Menschik ED, Goldszal AF, Murray JP, Weiner MG, Langlotz CP (2006) Development and validation of queries using structured query language (SQL) to determine the utilization of comparison imaging in radiology reports stored on PACS. J Digit Imaging 19:52–68CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 15.Barish MA, Moffett RA (2014) PACS-integrated automatic deformable chest CT registration reduces radiologist time to match lung nodule locations across serial exams. Paper presented at the annual meeting of SIIM in the scientific session Advanced Imaging & CAD, Long Beach, CA. Paper retrieved from http://siim.org/siim2014/scientific-program/pacs-integrated-automatic-deformable-chest-ct-registration-reduces