Skip to main content
Log in

Multimodal image registration with joint structure tensor and local entropy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Nonrigid registration of multimodal medical images remains a challenge in image-guided interventions. A common approach is to use mutual information (MI), which is robust to the intensity variations across modalities. However, primarily based on intensity distribution, MI does not take into account of underlying spatial and structural information of the images, which might lead to local optimization. To address such a challenge, this paper proposes a two-stage multimodal nonrigid registration scheme with joint structural information and local entropy.

Methods

In our two-stage multimodal nonrigid registration scheme, both the reference image and floating image are firstly converted to a common space. A unified representation in the common space for the images is constructed by fusing the structure tensor (ST) trace with the local entropy (LE). Through the representation that reflects its geometry uniformly across modalities, the complicated deformation field is estimated using \(L_{1}\) or \(L_{2}\) distance.

Results

We compared our approach to four other methods: (1) the method using LE, (2) the method using ST, (3) the method using spatially weighted LE and (4) the conventional MI-based method. Quantitative evaluations on 80 multimodal image pairs of different organs including 50 pairs of MR images with artificial deformations, 20 pairs of medical brain MR images and 10 pairs of breast images showed that our proposed method outperformed the comparison methods. Student’s t test demonstrated that our method achieved statistically significant improvement on registration accuracy.

Conclusion

The two-stage registration with joint ST and LE outperformed the conventional MI-based method for multimodal images. Both the ST and the LE contributed to the improved registration accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Sotiras A, Davatzikos C, Paragios N (2013) Deformable medical image registration: a survey. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 32(7):1153–1190

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Markelj P, Tomaževič D, Likar B, Pernuš F (2012) A review of 3D/2D registration methods for image-guided interventions. Med Image Anal 16(3):642–661

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Roujol S, Benois-Pineau J, de Senneville BD, Ries M, Quesson B, Moonen CTW (2012) Robust real-time-constrained estimation of respiratory motion for interventional MRI on mobile organs. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 16(3):365–374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Otake Y, Armand M, Armiger RS, Kutzer MD, Basafa E, Kazanzides P, Taylor RH (2012) Intraoperative image-based multiview 2D/3D registration for image-guided orthopaedic surgery: incorporation of fiducial-based C-arm tracking and GPU-acceleration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 31(4):948–962

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ferrant M, Nabavi A, Macq B, Black P, Jolesz F, Kikinis R, Warfield S (2012) Serial registration of intraoperative MR images of the brain. Med Image Anal 6(4):337–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang X, Eberl S, Fulham M, Som S, Feng DD (2008) Data registration and fusion. In: Feng DD (ed) Biomedical information technology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 187–210

  7. Lu X, Zhao Y, Zhang B, Wu J, Li N, Jia W (2013) A non-rigid cardiac image registration method based on an optical flow model. Opt Int J Light Electron Opt 124(20):4266–4273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lombaert H, Grady L, Pennec X, Ayache N, Cheriet F (2014) Spectral log-demons: diffeomorphic image registration with very large deformations. Int J Comput Vis 107(3):254–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang J, Wang J, Wang X, Feng D (2014) The adaptive FEM elastic model for medical image registration. Phys Med Biol 59:97–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhuang X, Arridge S, Hawkes DJ, Ourselin S (2011) A nonrigid registration framework using spatially encoded mutual information and free-form deformations. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 30(10):1819–1828

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wachinger C, Navab N (2012) Entropy and Laplacian images: structural representations for multi-modal registration. Med Image Anal 16(1):1–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Budde MD, Frank JA (2012) Examining brain microstructure using structure tensor analysis of histological sections. Neuroimage 63(1):1–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pluim JPW, Maintz JBA, Viergever MA (2000) Image registration by maximization of combined mutual information and gradient information. Med Image Comput Comput-Assist Interv MICCAI 2000 1935:452–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bay H, Ess A, Tuytelaars T, Gool LV (2008) Speeded-up robust features (SURF). Comput Vis Image Underst 110(3):346–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yang L, Guo BL, Ni W (2008) Multimodality medical image fusion based on multiscale geometric analysis of contourlet transform. Neurocomputing 72(1–3):203–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang GY, Wittek A, Joldes GR, Jin X, Miller K (2014) A three-dimensional nonlinear meshfree algorithm for simulating mechanical responses of soft tissue. Eng Anal Bound Elem 42: 60–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. MICCAI (2012) Challenge on multimodal brain tumor segmentation. http://www.imm.dtu.dk/projects/BRATS2012. Accessed 20 Dec 2014

  18. Bullitt E, Zeng D, Gerig G, Aylward S, Joshi S, Smith JK, Lin W, Ewend MG (2005) Vessel tortuosity and brain tumor malignancy: a blinded study. Acad Radiol 12:1232–1240

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Marami B, Sirouspour S, Capson DW (2011) Model-based deformable registration of preoperative 3D to intraoperative low-resolution 3D and 2D sequences of MR images. In: Fichtinger G, Martel A, Peters T (eds) Medical Image Computing Computer-Assisted Intervention—MICCAI 2011, Vol 6891. Springer, Berlin, pp 460–467

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 60871086 and Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province China, No. BK2008159.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiajun Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, J., Wang, J., Wang, X. et al. Multimodal image registration with joint structure tensor and local entropy. Int J CARS 10, 1765–1775 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-015-1219-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-015-1219-9

Keywords

Navigation