Intensity-based hierarchical elastic registration using approximating splines
- 157 Downloads
We introduce a new hierarchical approach for elastic medical image registration using approximating splines. In order to obtain the dense deformation field, we employ Gaussian elastic body splines (GEBS) that incorporate anisotropic landmark errors and rotation information. Since the GEBS approach is based on a physical model in form of analytical solutions of the Navier equation, it can very well cope with the local as well as global deformations present in the images by varying the standard deviation of the Gaussian forces.
The proposed GEBS approximating model is integrated into the elastic hierarchical image registration framework, which decomposes a nonrigid registration problem into numerous local rigid transformations. The approximating GEBS registration scheme incorporates anisotropic landmark errors as well as rotation information. The anisotropic landmark localization uncertainties can be estimated directly from the image data, and in this case, they represent the minimal stochastic localization error, i.e., the Cramér-Rao bound. The rotation information of each landmark obtained from the hierarchical procedure is transposed in an additional angular landmark, doubling the number of landmarks in the GEBS model.
The modified hierarchical registration using the approximating GEBS model is applied to register 161 image pairs from a digital mammogram database. The obtained results are very encouraging, and the proposed approach significantly improved all registrations comparing the mean-square error in relation to approximating TPS with the rotation information. On artificially deformed breast images, the newly proposed method performed better than the state-of-the-art registration algorithm introduced by Rueckert et al. (IEEE Trans Med Imaging 18:712–721, 1999). The average error per breast tissue pixel was less than 2.23 pixels compared to 2.46 pixels for Rueckert’s method.
The proposed hierarchical elastic image registration approach incorporates the GEBS approximation scheme extended with anisotropic landmark localization uncertainties as well as rotation information. Our experimental results show that the proposed scheme improved the registration result significantly.
KeywordsGaussian elastic body splines Image registration Deformation field approximation
- 2.Modersitzki J (2004) Numerical methods for image registration. Oxford University Press, Oxford Google Scholar
- 6.Bookstein FL (1989) Principal warps: thin-plate splines decomposition of deformation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 11:567–585Google Scholar
- 7.Rueckert D, Sonoda LI, Hayes C, Hill DLG, Leach MO, Hawkes DJ (1999) Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 18:712–721Google Scholar
- 9.Kohlrausch J, Rohr K, Stiehl H (2001) A new class of elastic body splines for nonrigid registration of medical images. In: Handels H, Horsch A, Lehmann T, Meinzer H-P (eds) Proceedings of the workshop Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin (BVM’01). Informatik aktuell 36. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 164–168Google Scholar
- 10.Rohr K, Sprengel R, Stiehl HS (1997) Incorporation of landmark error ellipsoids for image registration based on approximating thin-plate splines. In: Proceedings of the computer assisted radiology and surgery (CAR ’97), pp 234–239Google Scholar
- 11.Rohr K (1998) Image registration based on thin-plate splines and local estimates of anisotropic landmark localization uncertainties. In: Proceedings of the first international conference on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention (MICCAI ’98), pp 1174–1183Google Scholar
- 12.Wörz S, Rohr K (2006) New approximating Gaussian elastic body splines for landmark-based registration of medical images. Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin, pp 206–210Google Scholar
- 14.Lewis J, Hwang HJ, Neumann U, Enciso R (2004) Smart point landmark distribution for thin-plate splines. In: Proceeding of SPIE medical imaging, pp. 1236–1243Google Scholar
- 18.Andronache A, Cattin P, Szekely G (2005) Adaptive subdivision for hierarchical non-rigid registration of multi-modal images using mutual information. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 90:976–983Google Scholar
- 19.Chen Y, Dass S, Ross A, Jain A (2005) Fingerprint deformation models using minutiae locations and orientations. Appl Comput Vis IEEE Workshop Motion Video Comput 1:150–155Google Scholar
- 20.Chou P, Pagano N (1992) Elasticity—tensor, dyadic, and engineering approaches. Dover, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 21.Gefen A, Dilmoney B (2007) Mechanics of the normal woman’s breast. J Technol Health Care 15(4):259–271Google Scholar