Multi-compartment heart segmentation in CT angiography using a spatially varying gaussian classifier
- 228 Downloads
A fully automated and efficient method for segmenting ten major structures within the heart in Cardiac CT Angiography data for the purposes of display or cardiac functional analysis.
Materials and methods
A spatially varying Gaussian classifier is a flexible model for segmentation, combining the advantages of atlas-based frameworks, with supervised intensity models. It is composed of an independent Gaussian classifier at each voxel and uses non-rigid registration for the initial spatial alignment. We show how this large model can be trained efficiently and present a novel smoothing technique based on normalised convolution to mitigate inherent overfitting issues. The 30 datasets used in this study are selected from a variety of different scanners in order to test the robustness and stability of the algorithm. The datasets were manually segmented by a trained clinician.
The method was evaluated in a leave-one-out fashion, and the results were compared to other state of the art methods in the field, with a mean surface-to-surface distance of between 0.61 and 2.12 mm for different compartments.
The accuracy of this method is comparable to other state of the art methods in the field. Its benefits lie in its conceptual simplicity and its general applicability. Only one non-rigid registration is required, giving it a speed advantage over multi-atlas approaches. Further accuracy may be achievable through the incorporation of an explicit shape model.
KeywordsImage analysis Computed tomography angiography Atlas-based segmentation Classification Probabilistic modelling
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Cootes TF, Hill A, Taylor CJ, Haslam J (1994) The use of active shape models for locating structures in medical images. Distribution 12(6): 355–366Google Scholar
- 4.Stegmann MB (2005) Bi-temporal 3D active appearance models with applications to unsupervised ejection fraction estimation. In: Proceedings of SPIE, vol 5747, pp 336–350. SPIE, 2005Google Scholar
- 11.Lorenzo-Valdés M, Sanchez-Ortiz G, Mohiaddin R, Rueckert D (2002) Atlas-based segmentation and tracking of 3D cardiac MR images using non-rigid registration. In: Dohi T, Kikinis R (eds) Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention–MICCAI 2002. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 2488. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 642–650Google Scholar
- 13.Kirisli HA, Schaap M, Klein S, Papadopoulou SL, Bonardi M, Chen CH, Weustink AC, Mollet NR, Vonken EJ, van der Geest RJ, vanWalsum T, Niessen WJ (2010) Evaluation of a multi-atlas-based method for segmentation of cardiac CTA data: a large-scale, multicenter, and multivendor study. Med Phys 37(12): 6279PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Depa M, Holmvang G, Schmidt EJ, Golland P, Sabuncu MR (2011) Towards efficient label fusion by pre-alignment of training data. MICCAI 2011 workshop on multi-atlas labeling and statistical fusion, pp 1–9Google Scholar
- 16.Fischl B, Salat DH, Busa E, Albert M, Dieterich M, Haselgrove C, van der Kouwe A, Killiany R, Kennedy D, Klaveness S, Montillo A, Makris N, Rosen B, Dale AM (2002) Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain. Neuron 33(3): 341–355PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Knutsson H, Westin CF (1993) Normalised and differential convolution: methods for interpolation and filtering of incomplete and uncertain data. In: Proceedings of computer vision and pattern recognition, New York City, USA, IEEEGoogle Scholar
- 18.Gelman A (2006) Prior distributions for variance parameters in hierarchical models. Bayesian Anal 34(3): 377–390Google Scholar
- 20.Crum WR, Griffin LD, Hawkes DJ (2003) Zen and the art of medical image registration: correspondence, homology, and quality. In Pract 20: 1425–1437Google Scholar