Skip to main content

New prototype neuronavigation system based on preoperative imaging and intraoperative freehand ultrasound: system description and validation

International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery volume 6, pages 507–522 (2011)Cite this article

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this report is to present IBIS (Interactive Brain Imaging System) NeuroNav, a new prototype neuronavigation system that has been developed in our research laboratory over the past decade that uses tracked intraoperative ultrasound to address surgical navigation issues related to brain shift. The unique feature of the system is its ability, when needed, to improve the initial patient-to-preoperative image alignment based on the intraoperative ultrasound data. Parts of IBIS Neuronav source code are now publicly available on-line.

Methods

Four aspects of the system are characterized in this paper: the ultrasound probe calibration, the temporal calibration, the patient-to-image registration and the MRI-ultrasound registration. In order to characterize its real clinical precision and accuracy, the system was tested in a series of adult brain tumor cases.

Results

Three metrics were computed to evaluate the precision and accuracy of the ultrasound calibration. 1) Reproducibility: 1.77 mm and 1.65 mm for the bottom corners of the ultrasound image, 2) point reconstruction precision 0.62–0.90 mm: and 3) point reconstruction accuracy: 0.49–0.74 mm. The temporal calibration error was estimated to be 0.82 ms. The mean fiducial registration error (FRE) of the homologous-point-based patient-to-MRI registration for our clinical data is 4.9 ± 1.1 mm. After the skin landmark-based registration, the mean misalignment between the ultrasound and MR images in the tumor region is 6.1 ± 3.4 mm.

Conclusions

The components and functionality of a new prototype system are described and its precision and accuracy evaluated. It was found to have an accuracy similar to other comparable systems in the literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  1. Dussik K, Dussik F, Wyt L (1947) Auf dem Wege zur Hyperphonographie des Gehirnes. Wien med Wschr 97: 425–429

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. French LA, Wild JJ, Neal D (1950) Detection of cerebral tumors by ultrasonic pulses; pilot studies on postmortem material. Cancer 3: 705–708

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ballantine HT Jr, Bolt RH, Hueter TF, Ludwig GD (1950) On the detection of intracranial pathology by ultrasound, vol 112. Science, New York, pp 525–528

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ballantine HT Jr, Ludwig GD, Bolt RH, Hueter TF (1950) Ultrasonic localization of the cerebral ventricles. Trans Am Neurol Assoc 51: 38–41

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Voorhies RM, Patterson RH (1980) Preliminary experience with intra-operative ultrasonographic localization of brain tumors. Radiol Nucl Med 10: 8–9

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rubin JM, Mirfakhraee M, Duda EE, Dohrmann GJ, Brown F (1980) Intraoperative ultrasound examination of the brain. Radiology 137: 831–832

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Iseki H, Kawamura H, Tanikawa T, Kawabatake H, Taira T, Takakura K, Dohi T, Hata N (1994) An image-guided stereotactic system for neurosurgical operations. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 63: 130–138

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Koivukangas J, Ylitalo J, Alasaarela E, Tauriainen A (1986) Three-dimensional ultrasound imaging of brain for neurosurgery. Ann Clin Res 18(47): 65–72

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Koivukangas J, Louhisalmi Y, Alakuijala J, Oikarinen J (1993) Ultrasound-controlled neuronavigator-guided brain surgery. J Neurosurg 79: 36–42

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Trobaugh JW, Richard WD, Smith KR, Bucholz RD (1994) Frameless stereotactic ultrasonography: method and applications. Comput Med Imaging Graph 18: 235–246

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Oikarinen J, Jyrki A, Louhisalmi Y, Sallinen S, Helminen H, Koivukangas J (1993) The oulu neuronavigator system: intraoperative ultrasonography in the verification of neurosurgical localization and visualization. In: Maciunas RJ (eds) Interactive image-guided neurosurgery. AANS, USA, pp 233–246

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tirakotai W, Miller D, Heinze S, Benes L, Bertalanffy H, Sure U (2006) A novel platform for image-guided ultrasound. Neurosurgery 58: 710–718 discussion 710–718

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gronningsaeter A, Kleven A, Ommedal S, Aarseth TE, Lie T, Lindseth F, Langø T, Unsgard G (2000) SonoWand, an ultrasound-based neuronavigation system. Neurosurgery 47: 1373–1379 discussion 1379–1380

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Trantakis C, Meixensberger J, Lindner D, Strauss G, Grunst G, Schmidtgen A, Arnold S (2002) Iterative neuronavigation using 3D ultrasound. A feasibility study. Neurol Res 24: 666–670

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Engelhardt M, Hansen C, Brendel B, Hold S, Brenke C, Pechlivanis I, Harders A, Ermert H, Schmieder K (2007) Real time neuronavigation using 3-D ultrasound and MRI in patients with brain tumor. Advances in medical engineering. Springer, Berlin, pp 59–63

  16. Hata N, Dohi T, Iseki H, Takakura K (1997) Development of a frameless and armless stereotactic neuronavigation system with ultrasonographic registration. Neurosurgery 41: 608–613 discussion 613–614

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Tronnier VM, Bonsanto MM, Staubert A, Knauth M, Kunze S, Wirtz CR (2001) Comparison of intraoperative MR imaging and 3D-navigated ultrasonography in the detection and resection control of lesions. Neurosurg Focus 10: 1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gerganov VM, Akbarian A, Samii A, Samii M, Fahlbusch R (2008) Intraoperative visualization of tumor resection in patients with intracranial tumors—a comparison of two-dimensional ultrasound and high-field MRI. 59th annual meeting of the German society of neurosurgery (DGNC), Würzburg

  19. Albert FK, Forsting M, Sartor K, Adams HP, Kunze S (1994) Early postoperative magnetic resonance imaging after resection of malignant glioma: objective evaluation of residual tumor and its influence on regrowth and prognosis. Neurosurgery 34: 45–60 discussion 60–61

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Unsgaard G, Ommedal S, Muller T, Gronningsaeter A, Nagelhus Hernes TA (2002) Neuronavigation by intraoperative three-dimensional ultrasound: initial experience during brain tumor resection. Neurosurgery 50: 804–812 discussion 812

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Knauth M, Wirtz CR, Tronnier VM, Aras N, Kunze S, Sartor K (1999) Intraoperative MR imaging increases the extent of tumor resection in patients with high-grade gliomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 20: 1642–1646

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hatiboglu MA, Weinberg JS, Suki D, Rao G, Prabhu SS, Shah K, Jackson E, Sawaya R (2009) Impact of intraoperative high-field magnetic resonance imaging guidance on glioma surgery: a prospective volumetric analysis. Neurosurgery 64: 1073–1081

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. van Velthoven V (2003) Intraoperative ultrasound imaging: comparison of pathomorphological findings in US versus CT, MRI and intraoperative findings. Acta Neurochir Suppl 85: 95–99

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Unsgaard G, Selbekk T, Brostrup Muller T, Ommedal S, Torp SH, Myhr G, Bang J, Nagelhus Hernes TA (2005) Ability of navigated 3D ultrasound to delineate gliomas and metastases–comparison of image interpretations with histopathology. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 147: 1259–1269 discussion 1269

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lindseth F, Ommedal S, Bang J, Unsgaard G, Nagelhus Hernes TA (2001) Image fusion of ultrasound and MRI as an aid for assessing anatomical shifts and improving overview and interpretation in ultrasound guided neurosurgery. CARS 2001: 247–252

    Google Scholar 

  26. Nabavi A, Black PM, Gering DT, Westin CF, Mehta V, Pergolizzi RS Jr, Ferrant M, Warfield SK, Hata N, Schwartz RB, Wells WM 3rd, Kikinis R, Jolesz FA (2001) Serial intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging of brain shift. Neurosurgery 48: 787–797 discussion 797–798

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Clatz O, Delingette H, Talos IF, Golby AJ, Kikinis R, Jolesz FA, Ayache N, Warfield SK (2005) Robust nonrigid registration to capture brain shift from intraoperative MRI. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 24: 1417–1427

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hartkens T, Hill DL, Castellano-Smith AD, Hawkes DJ, Maurer CR Jr, Martin AJ, Hall WA, Liu H, Truwit CL (2003) Measurement and analysis of brain deformation during neurosurgery. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 22: 82–92

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Maurer CR Jr, Hill DLG, Martin AJ, Liu H, McCue M, Rueckert D, Lloret D, Hall WA, Maxwell RE, Hawkes DJ, Truwit CL (1998) Investigation of intraoperative brain deformation using a 1.5T interventional MR system: preliminary results. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 17: 817–825

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hastreiter P, Rezk-Salama C, Soza G, Bauer M, Greiner G, Fahlbusch R, Ganslandt O, Nimsky C (2004) Strategies for brain shift evaluation. Med Image Anal 8: 447–464

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Trantakis C, Tittgemeyer M, Schneider JP, Lindner D, Winkler D, Strauss G, Meixensberger J (2003) Investigation of time-dependency of intracranial brain shift and its relation to the extent of tumor removal using intra-operative MRI. Neurol Res 25: 9–12

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Comeau RM, Fenster A, Peters TM (1998) Intraoperative US in interactive image-guided neurosurgery. Radiographics 18: 1019–1027

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Schroeder W, Martin K, Lorensen B (2003) The visualization toolkit an object oriented approach to 3D graphics, VTK version 4.2. 3, vol 4. Kitware, New York

    Google Scholar 

  34. Neelin P (1998) The MINC file format: from bytes to brains. NeuroImage 7: 786

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gobbi DG, Comeau RM, Peters TM (1999) Ultrasound probe tracking for real-time ultrasound/MRI overlay and visualization of brain shift. MICCAI 1999, vol 1679. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Cambridge, UK, pp 920–927

  36. Mercier L, Lango T, Lindseth F, Collins DL (2005) A review of calibration techniques for freehand 3-D ultrasound systems. Ultrasound Med Biol 31: 449–471

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Treece GM, Gee AH, Prager RW, Cash CJ, Berman LH (2003) High-definition freehand 3-D ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 29: 529–546

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Prager RW, Gee A, Berman L (1998) Stradx: real-time acquisition and visualization of freehand three-dimensional ultrasound. Med Image Anal 3: 129–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Lindseth F, Tangen GA, Langø T, Bang J (2003) Probe calibration for freehand 3-D ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 29: 1607– 1623

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Blackall JM, Rueckert D, Maurer CR, Penny GP, Hill DLG, Hawkes DJ (2000) An image registration approach to automated calibration for freehand 3D ultrasound. MICCAI 2000, vol 1935. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Pittsburgh, USA, pp 462–471

  41. Maurer CR Jr, Fitzpatrick JM, Wang MY, Galloway RL Jr, Maciunas RJ, Allen GS (1997) Registration of head volume images using implantable fiducial markers. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 16: 447–462

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Fitzpatrick JM, West JB, Maurer CR Jr (1998) Predicting error in rigid-body point-based registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 17: 694–702

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Jannin P, Fitzpatrick JM, Hawkes DJ, Pennec X, Shahidi R, Vannier MW (2002) Validation of medical image processing in image-guided therapy. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 21: 1445–1449

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Comeau RM, Sadikot AF, Fenster A, Peters TM (2000) Intraoperative ultrasound for guidance and tissue shift correction in image-guided neurosurgery. Med Phys 27: 787–800

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Arbel T, Morandi X, Comeau RM, Collins DL (2001) Automatic non-linear MRI-ultrasound registration for the correction of intra-operative brain deformations. MICCAI 2001, vol 2208. LNCS. Springer, Utrecht, The Netherlands, pp 913–922

  46. Arbel T, Morandi X, Comeau RM, Collins DL (2004) Automatic non-linear MRI-ultrasound registration for the correction of intra-operative brain deformations. Comput Aided Surg 9: 123–136

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Klein D, Olivier A, Milner B, Zatorre RJ, Johnsrude I, Meyer E, Evans AC (1997) Obligatory role of the LIFG in synonym generation: evidence from PET and cortical stimulation. Neuroreport 8: 3275–3279

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Amiez C, Kostopoulos P, Champod AS, Collins DL, Doyon J, Del Maestro R, Petrides M (2008) Preoperative functional magnetic resonance imaging assessment of higher-order cognitive function in patients undergoing surgery for brain tumors. J Neurosurg 108: 258–268

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Sled JG, Zijdenbos AP, Evans AC (1998) A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 17: 87–97

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Collins DL, Neelin P, Peters TM, Evans AC (1994) Automatic 3D intersubject registration of MR volumetric data in standardized Talairach space. J Comput Assis Tomogr 18: 192–205

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Zijdenbos AP, Dawant BM, Margolin RA, Palmer AC (1994) Morphometric analysis of white matter lesions in MR images: method and validation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 13: 716–724

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. MacDonald D, Kabani N, Avis D, Evans AC (2000) Automated 3-D extraction of inner and outer surfaces of cerebral cortex from MRI. Neuroimage 12: 340–356

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Bucholz RD, Yeh DD, Trobaugh JW, McDurmott LL (1997) The correction of stereotactic inaccuracy caused by brain shift using an intraoperative ultrasound device. CVRMed MRCAS’97, pp 459–466

  54. Solberg OV, Lindseth F, Torp H, Blake RE, Nagelhus Hernes TA (2007) Freehand 3D ultrasound reconstruction algorithms—a review. Ultrasound Med Biol 33: 991–1009

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Coupe P, Hellier P, Morandi X, Barillot C (2007) A probabilistic objective function for 3d rigid registration of intraoperative us and preoperative MR brain images. ISBI, Arlington, pp 1320–1323

    Google Scholar 

  56. Ji S, Wu Z, Hartov A, Roberts DW, Paulsen KD (2008) Mutual-information-based image to patient re-registration using intraoperative ultrasound in image-guided neurosurgery. Med Phys 35: 4612–4624

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Reinertsen I, Descoteaux M, Drouin S, Siddiqi K, Collins DL (2004) Vessel driven correction of brain shift. MICCAI 2004, vol 3217, LNCS. Springer, Rennes, France, pp 208–216

  58. Reinertsen I, Lindseth F, Unsgaard G, Collins DL (2007) Clinical validation of vessel-based registration for correction of brain-shift. Med Image Anal 11: 673–684

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Collignon A, Maes F, Delaere D, Vandermeulen D, Suetens P, Marchal G (1995) Automated multi-modality image registration based on information theory. IPMI’95 3: 263–274

    Google Scholar 

  60. Lindner D, Trantakis C, Renner C, Arnold S, Schmitgen A, Schneider J, Meixensberger J (2006) Application of intraoperative 3D ultrasound during navigated tumor resection. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 49: 197–202

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Miller D, Heinze S, Tirakotai W, Bozinov O, Surucu O, Benes L, Bertalanffy H, Sure U (2007) Is the image guidance of ultrasonography beneficial for neurosurgical routine?. Surg Neurol 67: 579–587 discussion 587–588

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Prager RW, Rohling RN, Gee AH, Berman L (1998) Rapid calibration for 3-D freehand ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 24: 855–869

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Kowal J, Amstutz CA, Caversaccio M, Nolte L-P (2003) On the development and comparative evaluation of an ultrasuond B-mode probe calibration method. Comput Aided Surg 8: 107–119

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Rousseau F, Hellier P, Barillot C (2006) A novel temporal calibration method for 3-D ultrasound. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 25: 1108–1112

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Mascott CR, Sol JC, Bousquet P, Lagarrigue J, Lazorthes Y, Lauwers-Cances V (2006) Quantification of true in vivo (application) accuracy in cranial image-guided surgery: influence of mode of patient registration. Neurosurgery 59: 146–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Pfisterer WK, Papadopoulos S, Drumm DA, Smith K, Preul MC (2008) Fiducial versus nonfiducial neuronavigation registration assessment and considerations of accuracy. Neurosurgery 62: 201–207 discussion 207–208

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Villalobos H, Germano IM (1999) Clinical evaluation of multimodality registration in frameless stereotaxy. Comput Aided Surg 4: 45–49

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Woerdeman PA, Willems PWA, Noordmans HJ, Berkelbachvander Sprenkel JW (2006) Clinical accuracy of neuronavigation using registration methods based on point-pairs or surface matching. Int J CARS 1: 297–298

    Google Scholar 

  69. Dorward NL, Alberti O, Palmer JD, Kitchen ND, Thomas DG (1999) Accuracy of true frameless stereotaxy: in vivo measurement and laboratory phantom studies. Technical note. J Neurosurg 90: 160–168

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Shamir RR, Joskowicz L, Spektor S, Shoshan Y (2008) Localization and registration accuracy in image-guided neurosurgery: a clinical study. Int J CARS 3: S289

    Google Scholar 

  71. Fitzpatrick JM (2009) Fiducial registration error and target registration error are uncorrelated. SPIE Med Imaging 2009: 7261

    Google Scholar 

  72. Shamir RR, Joskowicz L (2009) Worst-case analysis of target localization errors in fiducial-based rigid body registration. In: Josien PWP, Benoit MD (eds) vol 7259. SPIE 725938

  73. Fitzpatrick JM (2010) The role of registration in accurate surgical guidance. J Eng Med 224: 607–622

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Letteboer MM, Willems PW, Viergever MA, Niessen WJ (2005) Brain shift estimation in image-guided neurosurgery using 3-D ultrasound. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 52: 268–276

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Keles GE, Lamborn KR, Berger MS (2003) Coregistration accuracy and detection of brain shift using intraoperative sononavigation during resection of hemispheric tumors. Neurosurgery 53: 556–562 discussion 562–564

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Ji S, Liu F, Hartov A, Roberts DW, Paulsen KD (2007) Brain–skull boundary conditions in a computational deformation model. In: Proceedings of SPIE, vol 6509, San Diego, USA 65092J

  77. Lindseth F, Bang J, Langø T (2003) A robust and automatic method for evaluating accuracy in 3-D ultrasound-based navigation. Ultrasound Med Biol 29: 1439–1452

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Wiles A, Peters T (2008) Interactive software tool for IGS performance evaluation. Int J CARS 3: S314

    Google Scholar 

  79. Weiler F, Hahn HK, Koehn A, Friman O, Klein J, Peitgen H-O (2008) Dealing with inaccuracies in multimodal neurosurgical planning—a preliminary concept. Int J CARS 3: S77–S78

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. McConnell Brain Imaging Center, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada

    Laurence Mercier, Anna Kochanowska, Simon Drouin, Charles X. B. Yan, Sean Jy-Shyang Chen & D. Louis Collins

  2. Brain Tumour Research Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada

    Rolando F. Del Maestro & Kevin Petrecca

  3. Department of Geriatric Medicine, The Australian National University, Canberra, SA, Australia

    Andrew L. Janke

Authors
  1. Laurence Mercier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rolando F. Del Maestro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kevin Petrecca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Anna Kochanowska
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Simon Drouin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Charles X. B. Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Andrew L. Janke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Sean Jy-Shyang Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. D. Louis Collins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laurence Mercier.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mercier, L., Del Maestro, R.F., Petrecca, K. et al. New prototype neuronavigation system based on preoperative imaging and intraoperative freehand ultrasound: system description and validation. Int J CARS 6, 507–522 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-010-0535-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-010-0535-3

Keywords

  • Application accuracy
  • Image-guided surgery
  • Intraoperative imaging
  • Intraoperative ultrasound
  • Neuronavigation
  • Registration