Skip to main content
Log in

Neurosurgical robotic system for brain tumor removal

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Brain tumor (e.g., glioma) resection surgery, representing the first step for many treatments, is often difficult and time-consuming for neurosurgeons. Thus, intelligent neurosurgical instruments have been developed to improve tumor removal.

Methods

The concept and robotic structure of intelligent neurosurgical instruments were introduced. These instruments consist of a surgical robot, a master device and operating software. The robot incorporates a surgical motion base and tool manipulator, including a volume control suction tool. Open Core Control software was developed for connecting intelligent neurosurgical instruments through a network connection and integrating the instruments into a system.

Results

Mechanical evaluation tests on the components and a preliminary system evaluation were performed. A phantom model was fixed on a head frame, and a tumor-removal procedure was successfully performed using prototype intelligent neurosurgical instruments.

Conclusion

Intelligent neurosurgical instruments are feasible and suitable for on-going evaluation in practical tasks, including in-vivo animal testing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. The Committee of Brain Tumor Registry of Japan (2003) Report of Brain Tumor Registry of Japan (1969–1996) (2003) Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 43(Suppl):i–vii, 1–111

  2. Hentschel SJ, Sawaya R (2003) Optimizing outcomes with maximal surgical resection of malignant gliomas. Cancer Control 10: 109–114

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lacroix M, Abi-Said D, Fourney DR et al (2001) A multivariate analysis of 416 patients with glioblastomamultiforme: prognosis, extent of resection, and survival. J Neurosurg 95: 190–198

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Claus EB, Horlacher A, Hsu L et al (2005) Survival rates in patients with low-grade glioma after intraoperative magnetic resonance image guidance. Cancer 103: 1227–1232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Stummer W, Pichlmeier U, Meinel T et al (2006) Fluorescence-guided surgery with 5-aminolevulinic acid for resection of malignant glioma: a randomised controlled multicentre phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 7(5): 392–401

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Guthart GS, Salisbury JK (2000) The intuitive telesurgery system: overview and application. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on robotics automation, pp 618–621

  7. Pott PP, Scharf HP, Schwarz ML (2005) Today’s state of the art in surgical robotics. Comput Aide Surg 10(2): 101–132

    Google Scholar 

  8. Goto T, Hongo K, Kakizawa Y (2003) Clinical application of robotic telemanipulation system in neurosurgery. J Neurosurg 99(6): 1082–1084

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Morita A, Shigeo S, Mitsuishi M (2005) Microsurgical robotic system for the deep surgical field: development of a rototype and feasibility studies in animal and cadaveric models. J Neurosurg 103(2): 320–327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sutherland GR, Latour I, Greer AD (2008) Integrating an imageguided robot with intraoperative MRI: a review of the design and construction of neuroArm. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 27: 59–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nakamura Y, Uchiyama T, Cai CM et al (2008) PWM type amorphous wire CMOS IC magneto-impedance sensor having high temperature stability. IEEE Trans Magn 44(11. Part2): 3981–3984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tanaka Y, Doumoto K, Sano A et al (2009) Expansion of balloon on soft object and its application to tactile sensor. In: Proceedings of the 2009 JSME IIP/ASME ISPS joint conference on micromechatronics for information and precision equipment, pp 313–314

  13. Arata J, Kozuka H, Kim HW et al (2010) Open core control software for surgical robots. Int J CARS 5(3): 211–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Arata J, Ikemoto J, Sakaguchi M, Fujimoto H (2007) Development of the surgical motion base system using a parallel link mechanism. In: Proceedings of Asian conference on computer aided surgery, 110076

  15. Arata J, Saito Y, Fujimoto H (2010) Outer shell type 2 DOF bending manipulator using spring-link mechanism for medical applications. In: Proceedings of international conference robotics and automation (ICRA), pp 1041–1046

  16. Tada Y, Sano A, Hayashi Y et al (2010) Extirpating brain tumor using a volume controllable suction tube. Int J CARS 5(Suppl 1): S257–S258

    Google Scholar 

  17. Arata J, Terakawa S, Fujimoto H (2009) Development of a back born shape allay force sensor using fiber optic. J JSCAS 11(3): 344–345 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Arata J, Kondo H, Sakaguchi M et al (2009) Development of a Haptic Device “DELTA-4” using Parallel Link Mechanism. In: Proceedings of international conference robotics and automation (ICRA) 2009, pp 294–300

  19. Tokuda J, Fischer GS, Papademetris X et al (2009) OpenIGTLink: an open network protocol for image-guided therapy environment. Int J Med Robotics Comput Assist Surg (2009). doi:10.1002/rcs.274

  20. Gering D, Nabavi A, Kikinis R et al (1999) An integrated visualization system for surgical planning and guidance using image fusion and interventional imaging. Int Conf Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2: 809–819

    Google Scholar 

  21. Open Core Control software (2010) http://svn.na-mic.org/NAMICSandBox/trunk/IntelligentSI/Control/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jumpei Arata.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arata, J., Tada, Y., Kozuka, H. et al. Neurosurgical robotic system for brain tumor removal. Int J CARS 6, 375–385 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-010-0514-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-010-0514-8

Keywords

Navigation