Skip to main content
Log in

Response to "Ultrasound-derived fat fraction is not yet ready for widespread clinical use" by Low et al

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
La radiologia medica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Low G, Wilson MP (2023) Ultrasound-derived fat fraction is not yet ready for widespread clinical use. Radiol Med 128:1174–1180

    Google Scholar 

  2. De Robertis R, Spoto F, Autelitano D et al (2023) Ultrasound-derived fat fraction for detection of hepatic steatosis and quantification of liver fat content. Radiol Med 128:1174–1180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-023-01693-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Ferraioli G, Kumar V, Ozturk A et al (2022) US attenuation for liver fat quantification: an AIUM-RSNA QIBA pulse-echo quantitative ultrasound initiative. Radiology 302:495–506. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.210736

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dillman JR, Thapaliya S, Tkach JA et al (2022) Quantification of hepatic steatosis by ultrasound: prospective comparison with MRI proton density fat fraction as reference standard. AJR Am J Roentgenol 219:784–791. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.22.27878

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Labyed Y, Milkowski A (2020) Novel method for ultrasound-derived fat fraction using an integrated phantom. J Ultrasound Med 39:2427–2438. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.15364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funds were received for this publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Riccardo De Robertis.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Statement

Ethical standards This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of interest

We declare no conflict of interest for this publication.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

De Robertis, R., Spoto, F., Autelitano, D. et al. Response to "Ultrasound-derived fat fraction is not yet ready for widespread clinical use" by Low et al. Radiol med 129, 348–349 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-024-01775-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-024-01775-1

Navigation