Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The GRAPHS-CRAFITY score: a novel efficacy predictive tool for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma treated with immunotherapy

  • Abdominal Radiology
  • Published:
La radiologia medica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate MR features associated with prognosis of unresectable HCC receiving immunotherapy and establish a MR feature-based scoring system to predict efficacy of immunotherapy.

Methods

This retrospective study included patients with unresectable HCC who received immunotherapy at 2 hospitals between August 2018 and February 2022. The last follow-up was October 2022. Clinical variables and MR features were assessed using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. A new scoring system was constructed based on independent risk factors and the CRAFITY score consisting of AFP (≥ 100 ng/ml) and CRP (≥ 1 mg/dl). And the predictive performance of CRAFITY core and new score were compared by receiver-operating-characteristics curves (ROCs), area under ROCs (AUCs), and calibration curves.

Results

A total of 166 patients (55.6 ± 10.4 years) were included in training cohort and 77 patients (55.4 ± 10.7 years) were included in validation cohort. There were significant differences in BCLC stage, max size, macrovascular invasion, intratumoral artery, and enhancing capsule between the 2 groups. Based on independent risk factors (gross GRowtH type, intratumoral fAt, enhancing tumor caPsule, Sex and CRAFITY score), a novel efficacy predictive tool named the GRAPHS-CRAFITY score was developed to predict OS. The OS was significantly different among the 3 groups according to GRAPHS-CRAFITY score (p value < 0.001). The GRAPHS-CRAFITY score could predict tumor response and disease control (p value < 0.001, p value < 0.001).

Conclusions

The GRAPHS-CRAFITY score is a reliable and easily applicable tool to predict the efficacy of unresectable HCC receiving immunotherapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets underlying this study are available on request to the corresponding author. Requests to access these datasets could be directed to yefeng@cicams.ac.cn and zhaohong@cicams.ac.cn.

Abbreviations

AFP:

Alpha-fetoprotein

AUC:

Area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve

BCLC:

Barcelona clinic liver cancer

CI:

Confidence intervals

CR:

Complete response

CRP:

C-reactive protein

ECOG PS:

Eastern cooperative oncology group performance status

HCC:

Hepatocellular carcinoma

MR:

Magnetic resonance

mRECIST:

Modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors

ORR:

Objective response rate

OS:

Overall survival

PD:

Progressive disease

PD-(L)1:

Programmed death (ligand) 1

PFS:

Progression free survival

PR:

Partial response

SD:

Stable disease

T-AUC:

Time-dependent area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve

TKI:

Tyrosine kinase inhibitor

References

  1. Llovet JM, Kelley RK, Villanueva A, Singal AG, Pikarsky E, Roayaie S, Lencioni R, Koike K, Zucman-Rossi J, Finn RS (2021) Hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Rev Dis Primers 7(1):6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-020-00240-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Vogel A, Meyer T, Sapisochin G, Salem R, Saborowski A (2022) Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet 400(10360):1345–1362. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01200-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Reig M, Forner A, Rimola J, Ferrer-Fabrega J, Burrel M, Garcia-Criado A, Kelley RK, Galle PR, Mazzaferro V, Salem R, Sangro B, Singal AG, Vogel A, Fuster J, Ayuso C, Bruix J (2022) BCLC strategy for prognosis prediction and treatment recommendation: the 2022 update. J Hepatol 76(3):681–693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2021.11.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Finn RS, Qin S, Ikeda M, Galle PR, Ducreux M, Kim TY, Kudo M, Breder V, Merle P, Kaseb AO, Li D, Verret W, Xu DZ, Hernandez S, Liu J, Huang C, Mulla S, Wang Y, Lim HY, Zhu AX, Cheng AL, Investigators IM (2020) Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med 382(20):1894–1905. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1915745

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ren Z, Xu J, Bai Y, Xu A, Cang S, Du C, Li Q, Lu Y, Chen Y, Guo Y, Chen Z, Liu B, Jia W, Wu J, Wang J, Shao G, Zhang B, Shan Y, Meng Z, Wu J, Gu S, Yang W, Liu C, Shi X, Gao Z, Yin T, Cui J, Huang M, Xing B, Mao Y, Teng G, Qin Y, Wang J, Xia F, Yin G, Yang Y, Chen M, Wang Y, Zhou H, Fan J (2021) Sintilimab plus a bevacizumab biosimilar (IBI305) versus sorafenib in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (ORIENT-32): a randomised, open-label, phase 2–3 study. Lancet Oncol 22(7):977–990. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00252-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang W, Gong C, Peng X, Bi X, Sun Y, Zhou J, Wu F, Zeng H, Wang Y, Zhou H, Zhao H, Cai J, Zhou A (2022) Serum concentration of CD137 and tumor infiltration by M1 macrophages predict the response to sintilimab plus bevacizumab biosimilar in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Clin Cancer Res 28(16):3499–3508. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-3972

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Finn RS, Ikeda M, Zhu AX, Sung MW, Baron AD, Kudo M, Okusaka T, Kobayashi M, Kumada H, Kaneko S, Pracht M, Mamontov K, Meyer T, Kubota T, Dutcus CE, Saito K, Siegel AB, Dubrovsky L, Mody K, Llovet JM (2020) Phase Ib study of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 38(26):2960–2970. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.00808

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Pradier A, Mamez AC, Stephan C, Giannotti F, Masouridi-Levrat S, Wang S, Morin S, Neofytos D, Vu DL, Melotti A, Arm I, Eberhardt CS, Tamburini J, Kaiser L, Chalandon Y, Simonetta F (2022) T cell receptor sequencing reveals reduced clonal breadth of T cell responses against SARS-CoV-2 after natural infection and vaccination in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Ann Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2022.09.153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Xu J, Shen J, Gu S, Zhang Y, Wu L, Wu J, Shao G, Zhang Y, Xu L, Yin T, Liu J, Ren Z, Xiong J, Mao X, Zhang L, Yang J, Li L, Chen X, Wang Z, Gu K, Chen X, Pan Z, Ma K, Zhou X, Yu Z, Li E, Yin G, Zhang X, Wang S, Wang Q (2021) Camrelizumab in combination with apatinib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (RESCUE): a nonrandomized, open-label. Phase II Trial Clin Cancer Res 27(4):1003–1011. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-2571

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Llovet JM, Castet F, Heikenwalder M, Maini MK, Mazzaferro V, Pinato DJ, Pikarsky E, Zhu AX, Finn RS (2022) Immunotherapies for hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 19(3):151–172. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-021-00573-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sangro B, Melero I, Wadhawan S, Finn RS, Abou-Alfa GK, Cheng AL, Yau T, Furuse J, Park JW, Boyd Z, Tang HT, Shen Y, Tschaika M, Neely J, El-Khoueiry A (2020) Association of inflammatory biomarkers with clinical outcomes in nivolumab-treated patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 73(6):1460–1469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2020.07.026

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Scheiner B, Pomej K, Kirstein MM, Hucke F, Finkelmeier F, Waidmann O, Himmelsbach V, Schulze K, von Felden J, Frundt TW, Stadler M, Heinzl H, Shmanko K, Spahn S, Radu P, Siebenhuner AR, Mertens JC, Rahbari NN, Kutting F, Waldschmidt DT, Ebert MP, Teufel A, De Dosso S, Pinato DJ, Pressiani T, Meischl T, Balcar L, Muller C, Mandorfer M, Reiberger T, Trauner M, Personeni N, Rimassa L, Bitzer M, Trojan J, Weinmann A, Wege H, Dufour JF, Peck-Radosavljevic M, Vogel A, Pinter M (2022) Prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with immunotherapy - development and validation of the CRAFITY score. J Hepatol 76(2):353–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2021.09.035

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang Y, Ouyang J, Zhou Y, Zhou J, Zhao H (2022) The CRAFITY score: a promising prognostic predictor for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitor and immunotherapy combinations. J Hepatol 77(2):574–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2022.03.018

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ronot M, Chernyak V, Burgoyne A, Chang J, Jiang H, Bashir M, Fowler KJ (2023) Imaging to predict prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma: current and future perspectives. Radiology 307(3):e221429. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.221429

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fowler KJ, Chernyak V, Ronot M, Vilgrain V, Kitao A, Lee JM, Motosugi U, Song B, Jiang H, Sirlin CB, Bashir MR (2023) Hepatocellular carcinoma: it is time to focus on prognosis. Radiology 307(3):e220884. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.220884

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Aoki T, Nishida N, Ueshima K, Morita M, Chishina H, Takita M, Hagiwara S, Ida H, Minami Y, Yamada A, Sofue K, Tsurusaki M, Kudo M (2021) Higher enhancement intrahepatic nodules on the hepatobiliary phase of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI as a poor responsive marker of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Cancer 10(6):615–628. https://doi.org/10.1159/000518048

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Heimbach JK, Kulik LM, Finn RS, Sirlin CB, Abecassis MM, Roberts LR, Zhu AX, Murad MH, Marrero JA (2018) AASLD guidelines for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 67(1):358–380. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.29086

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Finn RS, Kudo M, Merle P, Meyer T, Qin S, Ikeda M, Xu R, Edeline J, Ryoo BY, Ren Z, Cheng AL, Galle PR, Kaneko S, Kumada H, Wang A, Mody K, Dubrovsky L, Siegel AB, Llovet J (2022) LBA34 Primary results from the phase III LEAP-002 study: lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus lenvatinib as first-line (1L) therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC). Ann Oncol 33:S1401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2022.08.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lin K-Y, Lin Z-W, Chen Q-J, Luo L-P, Zhang J-X, Chen J-H, Wang K, Tai S, Zhang Z-B, Wang S-f, Zhang J-Y, You W-Y, Wang B, You P-H, Lin K-C, Yang T, Zeng Y-Y (2023) Perioperative safety, oncologic outcome, and risk factors of salvage liver resection for initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma converted by transarterial chemoembolization plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor and anti-PD-1 antibody: a retrospective multicenter study of 83 patients. Hep Intl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-023-10561-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Xin Y, Zhang X, Liu N, Peng G, Huang X, Cao X, Zhou X, Li X (2023) Efficacy and safety of lenvatinib plus PD-1 inhibitor with or without transarterial chemoembolization in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Hep Intl 17(3):753–764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-023-10502-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Yang X, Chen B, Wang Y, Wang Y, Long J, Zhang N, Xue J, Xun Z, Zhang L, Cheng J, Lei J, Sun H, Li Y, Lin J, Xie F, Wang D, Pan J, Hu K, Guan M, Huo L, Shi J, Yu L, Zhou L, Zhou J, Lu Z, Yang X, Mao Y, Sang X, Lu Y, Zhao H (2023) Real-world efficacy and prognostic factors of lenvatinib plus PD-1 inhibitors in 378 unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Hep Intl 17(3):709–719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-022-10480-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ren Z, Xu J, Bai Y, Xu A, Cang S, Du C, Li Q, Lu Y, Chen Y, Guo Y, Chen Z, Liu B, Jia W, Wu J, Wang J, Shao G, Zhang B, Shan Y, Meng Z, Wu J, Gu S, Yang W, Liu C, Shi X, Gao Z, Yin T, Cui J, Huang M, Xing B, Mao Y, Teng G, Qin Y, Wang J, Xia F, Yin G, Yang Y, Chen M, Wang Y, Zhou H, Fan J (2021) Sintilimab plus a bevacizumab biosimilar (IBI305) versus sorafenib in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (ORIENT-32): a randomised, open-label, phase 2–3 study. Lancet Oncol 22(7):977–990. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00252-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Donato H, França M, Candelária I, Caseiro-Alves F (2017) Liver MRI: from basic protocol to advanced techniques. Eur J Radiol 93:30–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.05.028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Conforti F, Pala L, Bagnardi V, De Pas T, Martinetti M, Viale G, Gelber RD, Goldhirsch A (2018) Cancer immunotherapy efficacy and patients’ sex: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 19(6):737–746. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30261-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wallis CJD, Butaney M, Satkunasivam R, Freedland SJ, Patel SP, Hamid O, Pal SK, Klaassen Z (2019) Association of patient sex with efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and overall survival in advanced cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol 5(4):529–536. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.5904

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Sieghart W, Pinter M, Hucke F, Graziadei I, Schöniger-Hekele M, Müller C, Vogel W, Trauner M, Peck-Radosavljevic M (2013) Single determination of C-reactive protein at the time of diagnosis predicts long-term outcome of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 57(6):2224–2234. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.26057

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mori S, Kita J, Kato M, Shimoda M, Kubota K (2015) Usefulness of a new inflammation-based scoring system for prognostication of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy. Am J Surg 209(1):187–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.02.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Duvoux C, Roudot-Thoraval F, Decaens T, Pessione F, Badran H, Piardi T, Francoz C, Compagnon P, Vanlemmens C, Dumortier J, Dharancy S, Gugenheim J, Bernard PH, Adam R, Radenne S, Muscari F, Conti F, Hardwigsen J, Pageaux GP, Chazouillères O, Salame E, Hilleret MN, Lebray P, Abergel A, Debette-Gratien M, Kluger MD, Mallat A, Azoulay D, Cherqui D (2012) Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a model including α-fetoprotein improves the performance of Milan criteria. Gastroenterology 143(4):986–994. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2012.05.052

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hatanaka T, Kakizaki S, Hiraoka A, Tada T, Hirooka M, Kariyama K, Tani J, Atsukawa M, Takaguchi K, Itobayashi E, Fukunishi S, Tsuji K, Ishikawa T, Tajiri K, Ochi H, Yasuda S, Toyoda H, Ogawa C, Nishimura T, Shimada N, Kawata K, Kosaka H, Tanaka T, Ohama H, Nouso K, Morishita A, Tsutsui A, Nagano T, Itokawa N, Okubo T, Arai T, Imai M, Naganuma A, Koizumi Y, Nakamura S, Joko K, Kaibori M, Iijima H, Hiasa Y, Kumada T (2022) Prognostic impact of C-reactive protein and alpha-fetoprotein in immunotherapy score in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab: a multicenter retrospective study. Hepatol Int. 45:789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-022-10358-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee S, Kim SH, Lee JE, Sinn DH, Park CK (2017) Preoperative gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for predicting microvascular invasion in patients with single hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 67(3):526–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2017.04.024

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wu TH, Yu MC, Chen TC, Lee CF, Chan KM, Wu TJ, Chou HS, Lee WC, Chen MF (2012) Encapsulation is a significant prognostic factor for better outcome in large hepatocellular carcinoma. J Surg Oncol 105(1):85–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.22060

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Siripongsakun S, Lee JK, Raman SS, Tong MJ, Sayre J, Lu DS (2012) MRI detection of intratumoral fat in hepatocellular carcinoma: potential biomarker for a more favorable prognosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 199(5):1018–1025. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.12.8632

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Rhee H, Chung T, Yoo JE, Nahm JH, Woo HY, Choi GH, Han DH, Park YN (2020) Gross type of hepatocellular carcinoma reflects the tumor hypoxia, fibrosis, and stemness-related marker expression. Hepatol Intl 14(2):239–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-020-10012-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sheng R, Zeng M, Jin K, Zhang Y, Wu D, Sun H (2021) MRI-based nomogram predicts the risk of progression of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma after combined lenvatinib and anti-PD-1 antibody therapy. Acad Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2021.09.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Murai H, Kodama T, Maesaka K, Tange S, Motooka D, Suzuki Y, Shigematsu Y, Inamura K, Mise Y, Saiura A, Ono Y, Takahashi Y, Kawasaki Y, Iino S, Kobayashi S, Idogawa M, Tokino T, Hashidate-Yoshida T, Shindou H, Miyazaki M, Imai Y, Tanaka S, Mita E, Ohkawa K, Hikita H, Sakamori R, Tatsumi T, Eguchi H, Morii E, Takehara T (2022) Multiomics identifies the link between intratumor steatosis and the exhausted tumor immune microenvironment in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.32573

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhu AX, Dayyani F, Yen CJ, Ren Z, Bai Y, Meng Z, Pan H, Dillon P, Mhatre SK, Gaillard VE, Hernandez S, Kelley RK, Sangro B (2022) Alpha-fetoprotein as a potential surrogate biomarker for atezolizumab + bevacizumab treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 28(16):3537–3545. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-3275

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Llovet JM, Montal R, Villanueva A (2019) Randomized trials and endpoints in advanced HCC: role of PFS as a surrogate of survival. J Hepatol 70(6):1262–1277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2019.01.028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kudo M, Montal R, Finn RS, Castet F, Ueshima K, Nishida N, Haber PK, Hu Y, Chiba Y, Schwartz M, Meyer T, Lencioni R, Llovet JM (2022) Objective response predicts survival in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with systemic therapies. Clin Cancer Res 28(16):3443–3451. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-3135

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Bruix J, Chan SL, Galle PR, Rimassa L, Sangro B (2021) Systemic treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: an EASL position paper. J Hepatol 75(4):960–974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2021.07.004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81972311, 82141127), the CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS) (2022-I2M-C&T-B-081), the Special Research Fund for Central Universities, Peking Union Medical College (No. 3332022026) and the Youth Project of Beijing Hope Marathon Special Fund (No. LC2021B17).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

(I) HZ, YW, JZ, and FY contributed to conception and design; (II) JC, HZ, XZ, YW, AZ, JZ, and FY involved in administrative support; (III) JC, HZ, XZ, YW, JZ, FY, AZ, WZ, and ZH gave provision of study materials or patients; (IV) YY, LL, YX, JO, and YZ involved in collection and assembly of data; (V) YY, LL, YX, JO, and YZ involved in data analysis and interpretation; (VI) YY, LL, YX, JO, and YZ involved in manuscript writing; (VII) all authors gave final approval of manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Feng Ye, Yong Wang, Jinxue Zhou or Hong Zhao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form and have no conflicts of interest to declare. The authors disclosed no relevant relationships.

Ethical approval

The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. This retrospective study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013) and was approved by the independent ethics committee of each center. Written informed consent for treatment was obtained from all patients before receiving systematic therapy. Informed consent to conduct the study was waived by the ethics committee, owing to its retrospective study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, Y., Li, L., Xu, Y. et al. The GRAPHS-CRAFITY score: a novel efficacy predictive tool for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma treated with immunotherapy. Radiol med 129, 188–201 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-023-01753-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-023-01753-z

Keywords

Navigation