Skip to main content
Log in

A critical examination and suggestions for large language models for structured reporting in radiology

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
La radiologia medica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Mallio CA, Sertorio AC, Bernetti C, Beomonte Zobel B (2023). Large language models for structured reporting in radiology: performance of GPT-4, ChatGPT-3.5, Perplexity and Bing. La radiologia medica, 1–5

  2. Shen Y, Heacock L, Elias J, Hentel KD, Reig B, Shih G, Moy L (2023) ChatGPT and other large language models are double-edged swords. Radiology 307(2):e230163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Şendur HN, Şendur AB, Cerit MN (2023) ChatGPT from radiologists’ perspective. Br J Radiol 96:20230203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lecler A, Duron L, Soyer P (2023) Revolutionizing radiology with GPT-based models: current applications, future possibilities and limitations of ChatGPT. Diagn Interv Imaging 104(6):269–274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ray PP, Majumder P (2023) ChatGPT in radiology: a deeper look into its limitations and potential pathways for improvement. Can Assoc Radiol J 12:8465371231177674

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. PPR conceived the idea, writing, editing, and reviewing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Partha Pratim Ray.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author has no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Human and animal participants

The present research did not involve human participants and/or animals.

Informed consent

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ray, P.P. A critical examination and suggestions for large language models for structured reporting in radiology. Radiol med 128, 1441–1442 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-023-01688-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-023-01688-5

Keywords

Navigation