Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Role of magnetic resonance imaging following postoperative radiotherapy in clinical decision-making of patients with high-grade glioma

  • Radiotherapy
  • Published:
La radiologia medica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

The present study aims to investigate the role of the first magnetic resonances (MRI) following radio-chemotherapy (RT-CT) in patients diagnosed with high-grade glioma.

Methods

We retrospectively recorded radiological evaluations following RT-CT, symptoms related to disease progression (avoiding any sign due to radiotherapy or chemotherapy) and the change of therapeutic strategy.

Results

In March 2021, at data analysis, the data of 149 patients diagnosed with high-grade glioma and treated between May 2013 and July 2020 were retrieved for the present analysis. Two out of 122 (1.6%), 5 out of 106 (4.7%) and 8 out of 92 (8.6%) asymptomatic patients received the diagnosis of disease recurrence at the time of the first, second and third MRI, respectively. Otherwise, 16 out of 27 (59.2%), 16 out of 24 (66.6%) and 13 out of 16 (82.2%) symptomatic patients changed their therapy after the first, second and third MRI, respectively. Among patients that experienced radiological signs of distant progression, 10 out of 14 were symptomatic and changed their therapy.

Conclusions

MRIs performed by 6 months after the end of RT-CT lead to change treatment strategy mostly in symptomatic patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Louis DN, Wesseling P, Aldape K, Brat DJ, Capper D, Cree IA, Eberhart C, Figarella-Branger D, Fouladi M, Fuller GN, Giannini C, Haberler C, Hawkins C, Komori T, Kros JM, Ng HK, Orr BA, Park SH, Paulus W, Perry A, Pietsch T, Reifenberger G, Rosenblum M, Rous B, Sahm F, Sarkar C, Solomon DA, Tabori U, van den Bent MJ, von Deimling A, Weller M, White VA, Ellison DW (2020) cIMPACT-NOW update 6: new entity and diagnostic principle recommendations of the cIMPACT-Utrecht meeting on future CNS tumor classification and grading. Brain Pathol 30(4):844–856. https://doi.org/10.1111/bpa.12832

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Weller M, Fisher B, Taphoorn MJ, Belanger K, Brandes AA, Marosi C, Bogdahn U, Curschmann J, Janzer RC, Ludwin SK, Gorlia T, Allgeier A, Lacombe D, Cairncross JG, Eisenhauer E, Mirimanoff RO, Groups EOfRaToCBTaR, Group NCIoCCT (2005) Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352 (10):987–996. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa043330

  3. Wen PY, Weller M, Lee EQ, Alexander BM, Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Barthel FP, Batchelor TT, Bindra RS, Chang SM, Chiocca EA, Cloughesy TF, DeGroot JF, Galanis E, Gilbert MR, Hegi ME, Horbinski C, Huang RY, Lassman AB, Le Rhun E, Lim M, Mehta MP, Mellinghoff IK, Minniti G, Nathanson D, Platten M, Preusser M, Roth P, Sanson M, Schiff D, Short SC, Taphoorn MJB, Tonn JC, Tsang J, Verhaak RGW, von Deimling A, Wick W, Zadeh G, Reardon DA, Aldape KD, van den Bent MJ (2020) Glioblastoma in adults: a Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) and European Society of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) consensus review on current management and future directions. Neuro Oncol 22(8):1073–1113. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaa106

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Montemurro N, Anania Y, Cagnazzo F, Perrini P (2020) Survival outcomes in patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy (LITT): A systematic review. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 195:105942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105942

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wen PY, Macdonald DR, Reardon DA, Cloughesy TF, Sorensen AG, Galanis E, Degroot J, Wick W, Gilbert MR, Lassman AB, Tsien C, Mikkelsen T, Wong ET, Chamberlain MC, Stupp R, Lamborn KR, Vogelbaum MA, van den Bent MJ, Chang SM (2010) Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group. J Clin Oncol 28(11):1963–1972. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.26.3541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Montemurro N, Fanelli GN, Scatena C, Ortenzi V, Pasqualetti F, Mazzanti CM, Morganti R, Paiar F, Naccarato AG, Perrini P (2021) Surgical outcome and molecular pattern characterization of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: A single-center retrospective series. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 207:106735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106735

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pasqualetti F, Montemurro N, Desideri I, Loi M, Giannini N, Gadducci G, Malfatti G, Cantarella M, Gonnelli A, Montrone S, Visani L, Scatena C, Naccarato AG, Perrini P, Gambacciani C, Santonocito O, Morganti R, Paiar F (2021) Impact of recurrence pattern in patients undergoing a second surgery for recurrent glioblastoma. Acta Neurol Belg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-021-01765-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Stupp R, Brada M, van den Bent MJ, Tonn JC, Pentheroudakis G, Group EGW (2014) High-grade glioma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 25(Suppl 3):iii93–iii101. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdu050

  9. Sulman EP, Ismaila N, Chang SM (2017) Radiation therapy for glioblastoma: American society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline endorsement of the American society for radiation oncology guideline. J Oncol Pract 13(2):123–127. https://doi.org/10.1200/JOP.2016.018937

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Booth TC, Luis A, Brazil L, Thompson G, Daniel RA, Shuaib H, Ashkan K, Pandey A (2021) Glioblastoma post-operative imaging in neuro-oncology: current UK practice (GIN CUP study). Eur Radiol 31(5):2933–2943. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07387-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kruser TJ, Bosch WR, Badiyan SN, Bovi JA, Ghia AJ, Kim MM, Solanki AA, Sachdev S, Tsien C, Wang TJC, Mehta MP, McMullen KP (2019) NRG brain tumor specialists consensus guidelines for glioblastoma contouring. J Neurooncol 143(1):157–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-019-03152-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, Initiative S (2007) The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med 147(8):573–577. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Perrini P, Gambacciani C, Weiss A, Pasqualetti F, Delishaj D, Paiar F, Morganti R, Vannozzi R, Lutzemberger L (2017) Survival outcomes following repeat surgery for recurrent glioblastoma: a single-center retrospective analysis. J Neurooncol 131(3):585–591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-016-2330-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Weller M, van den Bent M, Preusser M, Le Rhun E, Tonn JC, Minniti G, Bendszus M, Balana C, Chinot O, Dirven L, French P, Hegi ME, Jakola AS, Platten M, Roth P, Rudà R, Short S, Smits M, Taphoorn MJB, von Deimling A, Westphal M, Soffietti R, Reifenberger G, Wick W (2020) EANO guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of diffuse gliomas of adulthood. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-020-00447-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Pasqualetti F, Gonnelli A, Molinari A, Cantarella M, Montrone S, Cristaudo A, Baldaccini D, Mattioni R, Delishaj D, Mazzotti V, Morganti R, Cocuzza P, Fabrini MG, Lombardi G, Rudà R, Soffietti R, Paiar F (2018) Different timing to use bevacizumab in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: early. Anticancer Res 38(10):5877–5881. https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.12930

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Macdonald DR, Cascino TL, Schold SC, Cairncross JG (1990) Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma. J Clin Oncol 8(7):1277–1280. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1990.8.7.1277

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gilbert MR, Dignam JJ, Armstrong TS, Wefel JS, Blumenthal DT, Vogelbaum MA, Colman H, Chakravarti A, Pugh S, Won M, Jeraj R, Brown PD, Jaeckle KA, Schiff D, Stieber VW, Brachman DG, Werner-Wasik M, Tremont-Lukats IW, Sulman EP, Aldape KD, Curran WJ, Mehta MP (2014) A randomized trial of bevacizumab for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 370(8):699–708. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1308573

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Chinot OL, Wick W, Mason W, Henriksson R, Saran F, Nishikawa R, Carpentier AF, Hoang-Xuan K, Kavan P, Cernea D, Brandes AA, Hilton M, Abrey L, Cloughesy T (2014) Bevacizumab plus radiotherapy-temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 370(8):709–722. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1308345

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. de Wit MC, de Bruin HG, Eijkenboom W, Sillevis Smitt PA, van den Bent MJ (2004) Immediate post-radiotherapy changes in malignant glioma can mimic tumor progression. Neurology 63(3):535–537. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000133398.11870.9a

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Brandsma D, Stalpers L, Taal W, Sminia P, van den Bent MJ (2008) Clinical features, mechanisms, and management of pseudoprogression in malignant gliomas. Lancet Oncol 9(5):453–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70125-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors whose names appear on the submission made substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work, or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data; or the creation of new software used in the work; drafted the work or revised it critically for important intellectual content; approved the version to be published; and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Pasqualetti.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors agreed with the content of the present paper, gave explicit consent to submit and obtained consent from the responsible authorities at the institute/organization where the work has been carried out before the work is submitted. The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethical standards

This article does not contain any studies involving animals performed by any of the authors. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pasqualetti, F., Malfatti, G., Cantarella, M. et al. Role of magnetic resonance imaging following postoperative radiotherapy in clinical decision-making of patients with high-grade glioma. Radiol med 127, 803–808 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-022-01502-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-022-01502-8

Keywords

Navigation