Skip to main content
Log in

Caution in using 3D-EAUS as the first-line diagnostic tool in the preoperative work up for perianal fistulas

  • LETTER TO THE EDITOR
  • Published:
La radiologia medica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

MRI is considered the de facto imaging modality for evaluating perianal fistulas, primarily due to its excellent soft tissue contrast, operator independence, multiplanar capabilities and excellent field of view. Tridimensional endoanal ultrasound (3D-EAUS) is inferior to MRI in identifying and/or evaluating ischiorectal/supralevator tracks/extensions and therefore could end up providing incomplete and even inaccurate information (e.g. misclassification of tracks) to the surgeon, with a missed track potentially leading to recurrence of the disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Brillantino A, Iacobellis F, Reginelli A, Monaco L, Sodano B, Tufano G, Tufano A, Maglio M, De Palma M, Di Martino N, Renzi A, Grassi R (2019) Preoperative assessment of simple and complex anorectal fistulas: tridimensional endoanalultrasound? magnetic resonance? both? Radiol Med 124(5):339–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gage KL, Deshmukh S, Macura KJ, Kamel IR, Zaheer A (2013) MRI of perianal fistulas: bridging the radiological-surgical divide. Abdom Imaging 38(5):1033–1042. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-012-9965-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Yildirim N, Gökalp G, Öztürk E, Zorluoğlu A, Yilmazlar T, Ercan I, Savci G (2012) Ideal combination of MRI sequences for perianal fistula classification and the evaluation of additional findings for readers with varying levels of experience. Diagn Interv Radiol 18(1):11–19

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Buchanan GN, Bartram CI, Williams AB, Halligan S, Cohen CR (2005) Value of hydrogen peroxide enhancement of three dimensional endoanal ultrasound in fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 48(1):141–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. de Miguel Criado J, del Salto LG, Rivas PF, del Hoyo LF, Velasco LG, de las Vacas MI, Marco Sanz AG, Paradela MM, Moreno EF (2012) MR imaging evaluation of perianal fistulas: spectrum of imaging features. Radiographics 32(1):175–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rishi Philip Mathew.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest, and all authors have provided their consent.

Ethical standards

The manuscript does not contain clinical studies or patient data.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mathew, R.P., Patel, V. & Low, G. Caution in using 3D-EAUS as the first-line diagnostic tool in the preoperative work up for perianal fistulas. Radiol med 125, 155–156 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-019-01101-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-019-01101-0

Navigation