Skip to main content
Log in

Sclerotherapy of peripheral low-flow vascular malformations: technical aspects and mid-term clinical outcome

  • VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY
  • Published:
La radiologia medica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The therapeutical management of low-flow vascular malformations (LFVMs) is challenging because of high recurrence rate; multiple strategies have been proposed. This paper aims to report a single-center experience of direct puncture sclerotherapy of peripheral LFVMs, focusing on technical aspects and clinical outcome in mid-term follow-up.

Materials and methods

16 patients have been treated for peripheral LFVMs (mean age 36.1 years), complaining mild pain, swelling of the region of interest, and cosmetic nuisance. Preprocedural US and MR were acquired; angiography performed only in doubt vascular supply. Standard procedure consisted of direct puncture of the nidus using 20–23 gauge needles under US guidance and injection of up to 15 ml foam of sodium tetradecyl sulphate under fluoroscopic guidance. Clinical and radiological follow-up were assessed at 1, 3, and 6 months.

Results

Lesions were localized: 8 in the upper and 5 the in lower limbs, 2 in the cheeks, and 1 in the vaginal labia. All procedures have been technically accomplished (100%). At 6 month follow-up, technical and clinical success were obtained in all cases, while radiological follow-up showed 81.2% (13 patients) complete vessels thrombosis after multiple sclerotherapy sessions. No major complications have been recorded; five patients (31.2%) referred minor complications.

Conclusions

Sclerotherapy via direct puncture of LFVMs is a clinically effective procedure, well tolerated by patients, with reduced costs and mild minor complications rate; interventionalists should always clarify to the patients that multiple sessions would be performed and recurrences are expected at imaging follow-up despite clinical improvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cavezzi A, Parsi K (2012) Complications of foam sclerotherapy. Phlebology 27(Suppl 1):46–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mulliken J, Glowacki J (1982) Hemangiomas and vascular malformations in infants and children: a classification based on endothelial characteristics. Plast Reconstr Surg 69:412–422

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. McCafferty I (2015 Oct) Management of low-flow vascular malformations: clinical presentation, classification, patient selection, imaging and treatment. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 38(5):1082–1104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dubois J, Soulez G, Oliva V (2001) Soft tissue venous malformations in adult patients: imaging and therapeutic issues. Radiographics 21(6):1519–1531

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Puig S, Aref H, Brunelle F (2003) Double needle sclerotherapy of lymphangiomas and venous angiomas in children: a simple technique to prevent complications. AJR 180(5):1399–1401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tessari L (2000) Nouvelle technique d’obtention de la sclero-mousse. Phlebologie 53:129–133

    Google Scholar 

  7. Legiehn G, Heran M (2006) Classification, diagnosis and interventional radiologic management of vascular malformations. Orthop Clin North Am 37:435–474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Burrows P, Mason K (2004) Percutaneous treatment of low flow vascular malformations. J Vasc Interv Radiol 15:431–445

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Filippiadis DK, Binkert C, Pellerin O, Hoffmann RT, Krajina A, Pereira PL (2017) Cirse quality assurance document and standards for classification of complications: the cirse classification system. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 40:1141–1146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-017-1703-4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rosenblatt M (2007) Endovascular management of venous malformations. Phlebology 22:264–275

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Van der Vleuten C, Kater A, Wijnen W, Schultze-Kool L (2014) Effectiveness of sclerotherapy, surgery and laser therapy in patients with venous malformations: a systematic review. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 37:977–989

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yamaki T, Nozaki M, Sakurai H, Takeuchi M, Soejima K, Kono T (2008) Prospective randomized efficacy of ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy compared with ultrasound guided liquid sclerotherapy in the treatment of symptomatic venous malformations. J Vasc Surg 47:578–584

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cabrera J, Cabrera J Jr, Garcia-Olmedo MA (2001) Sclerosants in microfoam. A new approach in angiology. Int Angiol 20:322–329

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hassanein A, Mulliken J, Fishman S, Alomari A, Zurakowski D, Greene A (2012) Venous malformations: risk of progression during childhood and adolescence. Ann Plast Surg 68(2):198–201

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Deveiis J (2005) Percutaneous ethanol sclerotherapy for vascular malformations in the head and neck. Arch Facial Plast Surg 7(5):322–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Goyal M, Causer P, Armstrong D (2002) Venous vascular malformations in pediatric patients: comparison of results of alcohol sclerotherapy with proposed MR imaging classification. Radiology 223(3):639–644

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fayad L, Hazirolan T, Bluemke D (2006) Vascular malformations in the extremities: emphasis on MRI features that guide treatment options. Skeletal Radiol 35(3):127–137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Giurazza.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standards

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual patients included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Giurazza, F., Corvino, F., Cangiano, G. et al. Sclerotherapy of peripheral low-flow vascular malformations: technical aspects and mid-term clinical outcome. Radiol med 123, 474–480 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-018-0869-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-018-0869-4

Keywords

Navigation