Abstract
Since 2000, a series of scientific articles on CT have been raising increasing concern about the risk of radiation induced cancer in children. The alarming conclusions of some of these articles had international echo through global media, provoking widespread public concern. Actually, many of these alarming scientific publications appeared to be flawed by poor study design, but their conclusions were not openly contradicted. In US and Europe pediatric radiologists had to face a huge challenge, which brought to the Image Gently campaign and the Eurosafe initiative with the aim to rebut misinformation and to support medical radiation protection. The Linear No Threshold model—which is the base of contemporary radioprotection—is increasingly questioned by new recent studies suggesting that low dose radiation would decrease cancer risk thanks to the enhancement of immune system response. Actually, pediatric radiologists have to cope with many important issues and contradictory messages. Good medical practice includes good communication about the benefits and risks of health procedures, thus the communication of radiation risk is a key component for radiologists. When considering benefits and risks, an important risk is too often ignored: the risk that skipping a diagnostic exam may cause a misdiagnosis, and therefore, a poor outcome. We should emphasize that a risk from a radiological investigation is very small, if a risk at all, and we are not sure that there is a risk at very low doses, like those doses in the majority of X-ray procedures including CT.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ICRP (2007) The 2007 recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. ICRP Publication 103. Ann. ICRP 37 (2–4)
Sternberg S (2001) CT scans in children linked to cancer. USA TODAY 19 June 2001. http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/2001-01-22-scans.htm. Accessed 22 Nov 2016
Brenner DJ, Elliston CD, Hall EJ, Berdon WE (2001) Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from paediatric CT. AJR 176:289–296
Tomà P (2003) Radiation safety in children: what we should know. Radiol Med 105:83–91
http://www.imagegently.org/. Accessed 16 Nov 2016
Brenner DJ, Hall E (2012) Cancer risks from Ct scans: now we have data, what next? Radiology 265:330–331
Cohen MD (2015) ALARA, image gently and CT-induced cancer. Pediatr Radiol 45:465–470
http://www.eurosafeimaging.org/. Accessed 16 Nov 2016
Thomas KE (2011) CT utilization—trends and developments beyond the United States’ borders. Pediatr Radiol 41(Suppl 2):S562–S566
Granata C, Origgi D, Palorini F, Matranga D, Salerno S (2015) Radiation dose from multidetector CT studies in children: results from the first Italian nationwide survey. Pediatr Radiol 45:695–705
http://www.eurosafeimaging.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/European-Guidelines-on-DRLs-for-Paediatric-Imaging_FINAL-for-workshop_30-Sept-2015.pdf. Accessed 16 Nov 2016
Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284
Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R, Kim KP, Mahesh M, Gould R, de González AB, Miglioretti DL (2009) Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med 169:2078–2086
Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP, McHugh K, Lee C, Kim KP, Howe NL, Ronckers CM, Rajaraman P, Sir Craft AW, Parker L, de González AB (2012) Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 380:499–505
https://www.iaea.org/ns/tutorials/regcontrol/intro/glossaryq_r.htm. Accessed 16 Nov 2016
Committee to Assess Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation. Health Risks From Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2. National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council. The National Academies Press, Washington, 2006
Journy N, Rehel JL, Le Pointe HD, Lee C, Brisse H, Chateil JF, Caer-Lorho S, Laurier D, Bernier MO (2015) Are the studies on cancer risk from CT scans biased by indication? Elements of answer from a large-scale cohort study in France. Br J Cancer 112:185–193
Berrington de Gonzalez A, Salotti JA, McHugh K, Little MP, Harbron R, Lee C, Ntowe E, Braganza MZ, Parker L, Rajaraman P, Stiller C, Stewart DR, Craft AW, Pearce MS (2016) Relationship between paediatric CT scans and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: assessment of the impact of underlying conditions. Br J Cancer 114:388–394
Ozasa K, Shimizu Y, Suyama A, Kasagi F, Soda M, Grant EJ, Sakata R, Sugiyama H, Kodama K (2012) Studies of the mortality of atomic bomb survivors, report 14, 1950–2003: an overview of cancer and noncancer diseases. Radiat Res 177:229–243
Berrington A, Darby SC, Weiss HA, Doll R (2001) 100 years of observation on British radiologists: mortality from cancer and other causes 1897–1997. Br J Radiol 74:507–519
(2012) CT scans on children ‘could triple brain cancer risk’. http://www.bbc.com/news/health-18342867. Accessed 16 Nov 2016
(2012) Children’s CT scans pose cancer risk. http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303296604577450542017396860. Accessed 16 Nov 2016
National Radiological Protection Board (1991) Survey of CT practice in the UK. National Radiological Protection Board, Chilton
Shrimpton P, Hillier M, Lewis M, Dunn M (2005) Doses from computed tomography examinations in the UK-2003 (NRPB-W67). National Radiological Protection Board, Chilton
Mathews JD, Forsythe AV, Brady Z, Butler MW, Goergen SK, Byrnes GB, Giles GG, Wallace AB, Anderson PR, Guiver TA, McGale P, Cain TM, Dowty JG, Bickerstaffe AC, Darby SC (2013) Cancer risk in 680,000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians. BMJ 21(346):f2360
Miglioretti DL, Johnson E, Williams A, Greenlee RT, Weinmann S, Solberg LI, Feigelson HS, Roblin D, Flynn MJ, Vanneman N, Smith-Bindman R (2013) The use of computed tomography in pediatrics and the associated radiation exposure and estimated cancer risk. JAMA Pediatr 167:700–707
Baysson H, Journy N, Roué T, Ducou-Lepointe H, Etard C, Bernier MO (2016) Exposure to CT scans in childhood and long-term cancer risk: a review of epidemiological studies. Bull Cancer 103:190–198
UNSCEAR (2000) Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. Volume I: Sources. UNSCEAR 2000 Report. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. 2000 Report to the General Assembly, with scientific annexes. United Nations, New York
World Health Organization communicating radiation risks in paediatric imaging (2016). http://www.who.int/ionizing_radiation/pub_meet/radiation-risks-paediatric-imaging/en/. Accessed 16 Nov 2016
Goske MJ, Strauss KJ, Coombs LP, Mandel KE, Towbin AJ, Larson DB, Callahan MJ, Darge K, Podberesky DJ, Frush DP, Westra SJ, Prince JS (2013) Diagnostic reference ranges for pediatric abdominal CT. Radiology 268:208–218
Imaida K, Hasegawa R, Kato T, Futakuchi M, Takahashi S, Ogawa K, Asamoto M, Yamamoto T, Suzuki K, Inagaki T, Shinagawa N, Shirai T (1997) Clinico-pathological analysis on cancers of autopsy cases in a geriatric hospital. Pathol Int 47:293–300
Doss M (2016) Future of radiation protection regulations. Health Phys 110:274–275
Oliveira Cobucci RN, Saconato H, Lima PH, Rodrigues HM, Prudêncio TL, Junior JE, Giraldo PC (2012) Gonçalves AK Comparative incidence of cancer in HIV-AIDS patients and transplant recipients. Cancer Epidemiol 36:e69–e73
Doss M (2016) International Pediatric Radiology Meeting 2016. Chicago, IL, USA. http://www.pedrad.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=3E-HiVxngKs%3D&portalid=5. Accessed 30 Sept 2016
Joint Commission: Revised Requirements for Diagnostic Imaging Services (2015). http://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/6/HAP-CAH_DiagImag_Prepub_July2015release_20150105.pdf. Accessed 16 Nov 2016
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animal performed by any of the authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tomà, P., Cannatà, V., Genovese, E. et al. Radiation exposure in diagnostic imaging: wisdom and prudence, but still a lot to understand. Radiol med 122, 215–220 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-016-0709-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-016-0709-3