Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Relevance of eHealth standards for big data interoperability in radiology and beyond

  • COMPUTER APPLICATIONS
  • Published:
La radiologia medica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to report on the implementation of radiology and related information technology standards to feed big data repositories and so to be able to create a solid substrate on which to operate with analysis software. Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) and Health Level 7 (HL7) are the major standards for radiology and medical information technology. They define formats and protocols to transmit medical images, signals, and patient data inside and outside hospital facilities. These standards can be implemented but big data expectations are stimulating a new approach, simplifying data collection and interoperability, seeking reduction of time to full implementation inside health organizations. Virtual Medical Record, DICOM Structured Reporting and HL7 Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) are changing the way medical data are shared among organization and they will be the keys to big data interoperability. Until we do not find simple and comprehensive methods to store and disseminate detailed information on the patient’s health we will not be able to get optimum results from the analysis of those data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Health IT Legislation | Policy Researchers & Implementers | HealthIT.gov. https://www.healthit.gov/policy-researchers-implementers/health-it-legislation. Accessed 7 June 2016

  2. Affordable Care Act—HealthCare.gov Glossary, HealthCare.gov. https://www.healthcare.gov/glossary/affordable-care-act/. Accessed 15 June 2016

  3. Seidman J, Garrett P. EMR vs EHR—what is the difference? Health IT Buzz [Online]. https://www.healthit.gov/buzz-blog/electronic-health-and-medical-records/emr-vs-ehr-difference/. Accessed 15 June 2016

  4. Methods for De-identification of PHI| HHS.gov. http://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/special-topics/de-identification/index.html. Accessed 15 June 2016

  5. HITPC group, HITPC_Health_Big_Data_Report_FINAL.pdf. https://www.healthit.gov/sites/faca/files/HITPC_Health_Big_Data_Report_FINAL.pdf. Accessed 9 June 2016

  6. Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC®)—LOINC. http://loinc.org/. Accessed 9 June 2016

  7. IHTSDO, SNOMED CT. http://www.ihtsdo.org/snomed-ct. Accessed 9 June 2016

  8. RxNorm Pharmacology Codes, https://www.nlm.nih.gov. https://www.nlm.nih.gov/research/umls/rxnorm/. Accessed 10 June 2016

  9. Terminologies-systems—FHIR v1.0.2. https://www.hl7.org/fhir/terminologies-systems.html. Accessed 11 June 2016

  10. HL7 Standards Product Brief—HL7 Version 3 Standard: Common Terminology Services (CTS), Release 1. http://www.hl7.org/implement/standards/product_brief.cfm?product_id=10. Accessed 10 June 2016

  11. HL7 Standards Product Brief—HL7/ASTM Implementation Guide for CDA® R2—Continuity of Care Document (CCD®) Release 1 [Online]. http://www.hl7.org/implement/standards/product_brief.cfm?product_id=6. Accessed 10 June 2016

  12. Clunie DA (2000) DICOM structured reporting. PixelMed Pub, Bangor

    Google Scholar 

  13. DICOM Homepage Standard parts, dicom.nema.org. http://dicom.nema.org/standard.html. Accessed 14 June 2016

  14. Imaging reports using HL7 clinical document architecture [Online]. ftp://medical.nema.org/medical/dicom/current/output/pdf/part20.pdf. Accessed 10 June 2016

  15. ISO/HL7 27932:2009—Data Exchange Standards—HL7 Clinical Document Architecture, Release 2, ISO. http://www.iso.org/iso/home/store/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=44429. Accessed 10 June 2016

  16. Extensible Markup Language (XML). https://www.w3.org/XML/. Accessed 10 June 2016

  17. HL7 Standards Product Brief—CDA® Release 2. http://www.hl7.org/implement/standards/product_brief.cfm?product_id=7. Accessed 10 June 2016

  18. Reference Information Model (RIM) Downloads, HL7 Reference Information Model. http://www.hl7.org/implement/standards/rim.cfm. Accessed 14 June 2016

  19. Schema—W3C. https://www.w3.org/standards/xml/schema. Accessed 14 June 2016

  20. Schematron. http://www.schematron.com/. Accessed: 14 June 2016

  21. CDA Guideline Validation. http://cda-validation.nist.gov/cda-validation/downloads.html. Accessed 14 June 2016

  22. HL7 Standards Product Brief—HL7 Implementation Guide for CDA® Release 2: Consolidated CDA Templates for Clinical Notes. http://www.hl7.org/implement/standards/product_brief.cfm?product_id=379. Accessed 14 June 2016

  23. Structured Documents—Products. http://www.hl7.org/Special/committees/structure/products.cfm. Accessed 14 June 2016

  24. Marcheschi P, Mazzarisi A, Dalmiani S, Benassi A (2004) HL7 clinical document architecture to share cardiological images and structured data in next generation infrastructure. Comput Cardiol 2004:617–620

    Google Scholar 

  25. Marcheschi P, Mazzarisi A, Dalmiani S, Benassi A (2005) New standards for cardiology report and data communication: an experience with HL7 CDA release 2 and EbXML. Comput Cardiol 2005:383–386

    Google Scholar 

  26. Yun JH, Kim IK (2007) Processing HL7-CDA entry for semantic interoperability. In: International conference on convergence information technology, pp 1939–1944

  27. A.6.2 Transcoded HL7 CDA Release 2 ‘Diagnostic Imaging Report’. [Online]. http://dicom.nema.org/medical/Dicom/2015a/output/chtml/part20/sect_A.6.2.html. 10 June 2016

  28. IANA Media Types. http://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/media-types.xhtml. Accessed 15 Sept 2016

  29. NEMA—The Association of Electrical Equipment and Medical Imaging Manufacturers. http://www.nema.org/pages/default.aspx. Accessed 15 Sept 2016

  30. Zeilinger G, Montgomery O, Evans D, Willer F, Viswanathan S, Bowles T (2010) The dcm4che project homepage, Technical report, dcm4che. org

  31. Eichelberg M, Onken M, Thiel A. OFFIS DCMTK—DICOM toolkit [Online]. http://dicom.offis.de/dcmtk.php.en. Accessed 10 June 2016

  32. PixelMed Publishing™ [Online]. http://www.pixelmed.com/index.html#PixelMedJavaDICOMToolkit. Accessed 10 June 2016

  33. Digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM) supplement 65: chest computer-aided detection SR SOP class [Online]. ftp://medical.nema.org/medical/dicom/final/sup65_ft.pdf. Accessed 10 June 2016

  34. Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise® (IHE) [Online]. http://www.ihe.net/. Accessed 10 June 2016

  35. Scheduled workflow—IHE wiki [Online]. http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php/Scheduled_Workflow. Accessed 10 June 2016

  36. Key image note—IHE wiki [Online]. http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php/Key_Image_Note. Accessed 10 June 2016

  37. Simple image and numeric report—IHE wiki [Online]. http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php/Simple_Image_and_Numeric_Report. Accessed 10 June 2016

  38. Reporting workflow—IHE wiki [Online]. http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php/Reporting_Workflow. Accessed 10 June 2016

  39. Radiation exposure monitoring—IHE wiki [Online]. http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php/Radiation_Exposure_Monitoring. Accessed 10 June 2016

  40. Skodras A, Christopoulos C, Ebrahimi T (2001) The JPEG 2000 still image compression standard. Sig Process Mag IEEE 18(5):36–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Foos DH, Muka E, Slone RM, Erickson BJ, Flynn MJ, Clunie DA, Hildebrand L, Kohm KS, Young SS (2000) JPEG 2000 compression of medical imagery. In: Proceedings of SPIE 3980, medical imaging 2000: PACS design and evaluation: engineering and clinical issues, vol 85. doi:10.1117/12.386390

  42. HL7, “HL7 Standards Product Brief—HL7 Version 3 Standard: Clinical Decision Support; Virtual Medical Record (vMR) Logical Model, Release 2.” http://www.hl7.org/implement/standards/product_brief.cfm?product_id=338. Accessed 11 June 2016

  43. FHIR®—Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources [Online]. https://www.hl7.org/fhir/. Accessed 13 June 2016

  44. JavaScript object notation [Online]. http://www.w3schools.com/json. Accessed 13 June 2016

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fondazione Gabriele Monasterio CNR/Regione Toscana, Pisa, Italy

    Paolo Marcheschi

Authors
  1. Paolo Marcheschi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paolo Marcheschi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Author Paolo Marcheschi declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marcheschi, P. Relevance of eHealth standards for big data interoperability in radiology and beyond. Radiol med 122, 437–443 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-016-0691-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-016-0691-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation