Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sonoelastography of the distal third of the Achilles tendon in asymptomatic volunteers: correlation with anthropometric data, ultrasound findings and reproducibility of the method

  • MUSCULOSKELETAL RADIOLOGY
  • Published:
La radiologia medica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Evaluating prospectively elastosonographyc (EUS) findings of distal third of Achilles tendon in asymptomatic volunteers and correlating with subject characteristics and ultrasound (US) findings and, subsequently, calculating reproducibility of method.

Materials and methods

70 consecutives Achilles tendons were examined with US and EUS in 35 asymptomatic volunteers. Mean age 42.3 years (±7.6), 22 were female (mean age 41 ± 8.7) and 13 were male (mean age 42.5 ± 11.4). Information about population was collected (anthropometric data, sport activity, taken therapy and associated conditions/pathologies).

Results

Statistically significant correlation was found between BMI and EUS findings (p = 0.007) and between EUS aspect and US diagnosis (p = 0.039) both to the right tendon. Possible influence of smoking (p = 0.063 to right) and associated conditions (p = 0. 059 to left), has been found. The multivariate analysis showed that EUS results are correlated only with BMI (high BMI corresponds to the best EUS results), independently from smoke and associated conditions on right side. No correlations have emerged for the left tendon. The 22.8 % of the volunteers took on chronic therapies, none statistically significant correlation. In the past, 80 % of subjects played sports (7.4 % agonistic and 92.6 % non-agonistic). The 22.9 % of volunteers played sporadic or no activity. The 60 % of volunteers has played sports that may lead overload of the Achilles tendon. The 61.5 % of subjects with BMI ≥ 25 was active little or nothing; 63.6 % of the subjects with BMI < 25 is playing sports. US examination showed 57.1 % normal tendons and 42.9 % tendinosic. Rate of tendinosic tendons was similar in both left and right (40 and 45.7 %, respectively). Statistically significant correlation was found between EUS aspect and US diagnosis on the right tendon but not on the left Correlation between thickness and EUS aspect was calculated: no correlation was found. Interoperator correlation was excellent (k = 0.89 for left tendon and k = 0.91 for right tendon).

Conclusions

The EUS is an interesting and useful technique, characterised by a high reproducibility. Its results are related to BMI and US appearance of the tendon, and they are probably influenced by the smoke and associated conditions. However, the flexed ankle position, needed to properly examine the distal third by US, alters the elasticity of the tendon and causes false negative results to EUS. Then, for the EUS study of the distal third, it would be appropriate the relaxed position, with a gel pad to optimise the probe adhesion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. De Zordo T, Fink C, Feuchtner GM, Smezkal V, Reindl M, Klauser AS (2009) Real-time sonoelastography findings in healthy Achilles tendons. AJR 193:W134–W138. doi:10.2214/AJR.08.1843

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Giombini A, Dragoni S, Di Cesare A, Di Cesare M, Del Buono A, Maffulli N (2011) Asymptomatic Achilles, patellar, and quadriceps tendinopathy: a longitudinal clinical and ultrasonographus study in elite fencers. Scand j Med Sports. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0838.2011.01400.x

  3. Öheberg L (2016) The chronic painful Achilles tendon: sonographic findings and new methods for treatment. UMEA Univerdity Medica Dissertations. New series No. 860–ISSN 0346-6612-ISBN91-7305-536-0

  4. Maffulli N (1999) Rupture of the Achilles Tendon. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81(7):1019–1036

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Holmes GB, Lin J (2006) Etiologic factors associated with syntomatic Achilles tendinopathy. Foot Ankle Int 27:952–959

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dong Q, Fessel DP (2009) Achilles tendon ultrasound technique. AJR 193:W173. doi:10.2214/AJR.09.3111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ruan Z, Zhao B, Qi H et al (2015) Elasticity of healty Achilles tendon decreases with the increase of age as determined by acoustic radiation force impulse imaging. Int Clin Exp Med 8(1):1043–1050

    Google Scholar 

  8. Williams JGP (1986) Achilles tendon lesions in sport. Sport Med 3(2):114–135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hoppenfeld S (1976) Physical examination of the spine and extremities. Appelton century crofts Norwalk, Connecticut

    Google Scholar 

  10. van Dijk CN, van Sterkenburg MN, Wiegerinck JI, Karlsson J, Maffulli N (2011) Terminology for Achilles tendon related disorders. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(5):835–841. doi:10.1007/s00167-010-1374-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Haglund P (1928) Beitrag zur Klinik der Achillessehne. Zeitschr Orthop Chir 49:49–58

    Google Scholar 

  12. Drakonaki EE, Allen GM, Wilson DJ (2009) Real-time ultrasound elastography of the normal Achilles tendon: reproducibility and pattern description. J. Crad 64:1196–1202. doi:10.1016/j.crad.2009.08.006

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tan S, Kudaş S, Özcan AS, İA, Karaoğlanoğlu M, Arslan H, Bozkurt M (2011) Real-time sonoelastography of the Achilles tendon: pattern description in healty subject and patients with surgically repaired complete ruptures. Skeleta Radiol. doi:10.1007/s0256-011-1339-4

  14. De Zordo T, Lil SR, Fink C, Feuchtner GM, Jaschke W, Bellman-Weiler R, Klauser A (2009) Real-time sonoelastography of lateral epicondylitis: comparison of findings between patients and healthy volunteers. AJR 193:180–185. doi:10.2214/AJR.08.2020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hartgerink P, Fessel P, Jacobson JA, van Holsbeek MT (2001) Full-versus partial-thickness Achilles tendon tears: sonographic accuracy and characterization in 26 cases with surgical correlation. Radiol 220:406–412. doi:10.1148/radiol.2202001456

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Aubry S, Barbier-Brion B, Tatu L, Vidal C, Kastler B (2011) Transient elastography of calcaneal tendon: preliminary results and future prospects. J Radiol 92(5):421–427

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sconfienza LM, Silvestri E, Orlandi D et al (2013) Real-time sonoelastography of the plantar fascia: comparison between patients with plantar fasciitis and healty control subjects. Radiology 267:195–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Landis JR, Kock CG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Klauser AS, Faschingbauer R, Jaschke WR (2010) Is sonoelastography of value in assessing tendons? Semin Muscoloskelet Radiol 14(3):323–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kot BC, Zhang ZJ, Lee AW, Leung VY, Fu SN (2012) Elastic modulus of muscle and tendon with shear wave ultrasound elastography: variations with different technical settings. PLoS One 7(8):e44348. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0044348

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Li Y, Snedeker JG (2011) Elastography: modality-specific approaches, clinical applications, and research horizons. Skeletal Radiol 40:389–397. doi:10.1007/s00256-010-0918-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ooi CC, Schneider ME, Malliaras P et al (2015) Diagnostic performance of axial-strain sonoelastography in confirming clinically diagnosed Achilles tendinopaty: comparison with B-mode and color doppler imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol 41(1):15–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Turan A, Teber MA, Ilerisoy Z et al (2015) Sonoelastographıc assessment of the age-related changes of the Achilles tendon. Med Ultrason 17(1):58–61

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hansrani V (2010) Is there a relationship between smoking and the outcomes of tendon or ligament repair and wound healing? Curr Orthop Pract 21(4):396–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kane SM, Dave A, Haque A, Langston K (2006) The incidence of rotator cuff disease in smoking and non-smoking patients: a cadaveric study. Orthopedics 29(4):363–366

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. DeZordo T, Chhem R, Smahal V, Keuchtner G, Reindi M, Fink C, Faschingbauer R, Jaschke W, Klauser AS (2010) Real-time sonoelastography: findings in patients with symptomatic Achilles tendons and comparison to healty volunteers. Ultraschall Med 31(4):394–400

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Drakonaki EE, Allen GM, Wilson DJ (2012) Ultrasound elastography for musculoskeletal applications. Br J Radiol 85:1435–1445. doi:10.1259/bjr/93042867

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emanuela Capalbo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that she has no conflict of interest.

Funding

None funding have this study.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in the studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Capalbo, E., Peli, M. & Stradiotti, P. Sonoelastography of the distal third of the Achilles tendon in asymptomatic volunteers: correlation with anthropometric data, ultrasound findings and reproducibility of the method. Radiol med 121, 667–674 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-016-0642-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-016-0642-5

Keywords

Navigation