Advertisement

La radiologia medica

, Volume 119, Issue 6, pp 377–383 | Cite as

Early MRI findings of small bowel obstruction: an experimental study in rats

  • Daniela Berritto
  • Francesca IacobellisEmail author
  • Maria Paola Belfiore
  • Claudia Rossi
  • Luca Saba
  • Roberto Grassi
Abdominal Radiology

Abstract

Purpose

This study was undertaken to identify the early magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of small bowel obstruction (SBO) and to analyse their evolution over time comparing them with histological findings.

Materials and methods

SBO was surgically induced in 10 rats divided into two groups monitored at predetermined time points until the 8th hour: group 1, macroscopically observed and group 2, investigated with 7-Tesla micro-MRI (7T μ-MR). At the end of observation, the bowel was excised for histological analysis.

Results

7T μ-MRI T2-w sequences acquired 15 min after SBO, showed early evidence of bowel wall hyperintensity and a small amount of peritoneal free fluid. At 1 h, a hyperintensity of the loop proximal to the obstruction was found and, after 4 h, free fluid between the loops, bowel wall thickening and increased wall hyperintensity were also found. After 6 h hypotonic reflex ileus (only gas-filled dilated loops) was detected, which became paralytic ileus (dilation with air–fluid levels) after 8 h. The MRI findings were all confirmed at histological examination.

Conclusions

This study allows definition of the early MRI features of SBO (peritoneal free fluid and hyperintensity of the injured bowel) and their chronological evolution, also confirmed by histological examination. Our data suggest a potential role of MR imaging in the early diagnostic assessment and management of patients with SBO. The chance to achieve an early detection of bowel injury and to correlate the histological pattern with imaging findings could contribute to a finer and earlier diagnosis and a more effective treatment.

Keywords

Small bowel obstruction Magnetic resonance imaging Experimental study Animal model 

Notes

Conflict of interest

D. Berritto, F. Iacobellis, M. P. Belfiore, C. Rossi, L. Saba, R. Grassi declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Maglinte DD, Heitkamp DE, Howard TJ et al (2003) Current concepts in imaging of small bowel obstruction. Radiol Clin North Am 41:263–283PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Takahara T, Kwee TC, Haradome H et al (2011) Peristalsis gap sign at cine magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing strangulated small bowel obstruction: feasibility study. Jpn J Radiol 29:11–18PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Khurana B, Ledbetter S, McTavish J (2002) Bowel obstruction revealed by multidetector CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:1139–1144 ReviewPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Delabrousse E, Destrumelle N, Brunelle SW et al (2003) CT of small bowel obstruction in adults. Abdom Imaging 28:257–266 ReviewPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Silva AC, Pimenta M, Guimarães LS (2009) Small bowel obstruction: what to look for. Radiographic 29:423–439 ReviewCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Angelelli G, Moschetta M, Cosmo T et al (2012) CT diagnosis of the nature of bowel obstruction: morphological evaluation of the transition point. Radiol Med 117:749–758PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Scaglione M, Grassi R, Pinto A et al (2004) Positive predictive value and negative predictive value of spiral CT in the diagnosis of closed loop obstruction complicated by intestinal ischemia. Radiol Med 107:69–77PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grassi R, Cavaliere C, Cozzolino S et al (2009) Small animal imaging facility: new perspectives for the radiologist. Radiol Med 114:152–167PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Berritto D, Somma F, Landi N et al (2011) Seven-Tesla micro-MRI in early detection of acute arterial ischaemia: evolution of findings in an in vivo rat model. Radiol Med 116:829–841PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Iacobellis F, Berritto D, Somma F et al (2009) Magnetic resonance imaging: a new tool for diagnosis of acute ischemic colitis? World J Gastroenterol 18:1496–1501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Somma F, Berritto D, Iacobellis F et al (2013) 7T μMRI of mesenteric venous ischemia in a rat model: timing of the appearance of findings. Magn Reson Imaging 31:408–413PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tamijmarane A, Chandra S, Smile SR (2000) Clinical aspects of adhesive intestinal obstruction. Trop Gastroenterol 21:141–143PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Oladele AO, Akinkuolie AA, Agbakwuru EA (2008) Pattern of intestinal obstruction in a semiurban Nigerian hospital. Niger J Clin Pract 11:347–350PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Markogiannakis H, Messaris E, Dardamanis D et al (2007) Acute mechanical bowel obstruction: clinical presentation, etiology, management and outcome. World J Gastroenterol 13:432–437PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Neff M, Schmidt B (2010) Laparoscopic treatment of a postoperative small bowel obstruction. JSLS 14:133–136PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Di Mizio R, Grassi R, Marchese E et al (1995) “Uncompensated” small bowel obstruction in adults. Ultrasonographic findings of free fluid between loops and its prognostic value. Radiol Med 89:787–791 ItalianPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Donckier V, Closset J, Van Gansbeke D et al (1998) Contribution of computed tomography to decision making in the management of adhesive small bowel obstruction. Br J Surg 85:1071–1074PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zielinski MD, Eiken PW, Bannon MP et al (2010) Small bowel obstruction-who needs an operation? A multivariate prediction model. World J Surg 34:910–919PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    O’Daly BJ, Ridgway PF, Keenan N et al (2009) Detected peritoneal fluid in small bowel obstruction is associated with the need for surgical intervention. Can J Surg 52:201–206PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schmutz GR, Benko A, Fournier L et al (1997) Small bowel obstruction: role and contribution of sonography. Eur Radiol 7:1054–1058PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Di Mizio R, Scaglione M (2007) Small bowel obstruction. CT features with plain film and US correlations. Springer, ItalyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schwenter F, Poletti PA, Platon A et al (2010) Clinicoradiological score for predicting the risk of strangulated small bowel obstruction. Br J Surg 97:1119–1125PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sarraf-Yazdi S, Shapiro ML (2010) Small bowel obstruction: the eternal dilemma of when to intervene. Scand J Surg 99:78–80PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Garcia DA, Froes TR, Vilani RG et al (2011) Ultrasonography of small intestinal obstructions: a contemporary approach. J Small Anim Pract 52:484–490PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Unlüer EE, Yavaşi O, Eroğlu O et al (2010) Ultrasonography by emergency medicine and radiology residents for the diagnosis of small bowel obstruction. Eur J Emerg Med 17:260–264PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Musoke F, Kawooya MG, Kiguli-Malwadde E (2003) Comparison between sonographic and plain radiography in the diagnosis of small bowel obstruction at Mulago Hospital, Uganda. East Afr Med J 80:540–545PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Russo A, Zaottini A (2010) Ultrasound supplying early diagnosis of bowel occlusion. Comparison with conventional X-ray investigation for the detection of rising signs of this condition. G Chir 31:462–468 ItalianPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fidler JL, Guimaraes L, Einstein DM (2009) MR imaging of the small bowel. Radiographics 29:1811–1825PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lee JK, Marcos HB, Semelka RC (1998) MR imaging of the small bowel using the HASTE sequence. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170:1457–1463PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Regan F, Beall DP, Bohlman ME et al (1998) Fast MR imaging and the detection of small-bowel obstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170:1465–1469PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kim MY, Suh CH, Kim ST et al (2004) Magnetic resonance imaging of bowel ischemia induced by ligation of superior mesenteric artery and vein in a cat model. J Comput Assist Tomogr 28:187–192PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Delabrousse E, Destrumelle N, Brunelle S et al (2003) CT of small bowel obstruction in adults. Abdom Imaging 28:257–266PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Boudiaf M, Soyer P, Terem C et al (2001) CT evaluation of small bowel obstruction. Radiographic 21:613–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Italian Society of Medical Radiology 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniela Berritto
    • 1
  • Francesca Iacobellis
    • 1
    Email author
  • Maria Paola Belfiore
    • 1
  • Claudia Rossi
    • 1
  • Luca Saba
    • 2
  • Roberto Grassi
    • 1
  1. 1.Radiology DepartmentSeconda Università di NapoliNaplesItaly
  2. 2.Radiology DepartmentAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di CagliariCagliariItaly

Personalised recommendations