Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Utility of second-look ultrasound in the management of incidental enhancing lesions detected by breast MR imaging

Utilità del second look ecografico nel management delle lesioni incidentalmente identificate con RM della mammella

  • Breast Radiology / Senologia
  • Published:
La radiologia medica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the utility of second-look ultrasound (US) for identifying and characterising incidental enhancing lesions detected by breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Materials and methods

From among 655 consecutive breast MRI studies, 62 lesions (MRI visible, nonpalpable, occult at first-look US and mammography) were recommended for second-look US. MRI enhancement of lesions was mass-like in 59 cases (95%) and non-mass-like in three (5%). Forty-two lesions (68%) were ≤10 mm; only three lesions (5%) were >20 mm. Of all lesions, the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) MRI category was highly suggestive of malignancy in six cases (10%), suspicious abnormality in 33 (53%) and probably benign in 23 (37%). The correlation between MRI lesion appearance, lesion size, histopathology findings and detection rate at second-look US were analysed. The reference standard was histopathology and/or follow-up (range 18–24 months). Statistical analysis was performed with the Fisher exact test.

Results

Second-look US identified 44 out of 62 (71%) lesions depicted at MRI. The detection rate at second-look US was higher for mass-like MRI lesions (75%) than nonmass-like lesions (0%), for lesion size >10mm (90%) and for BI-RADS 4 lesions (88%). Second-look US-guided biopsy detected 12 out of 17 (71%) malignant lesions. There was no correlation between the likelihood of carcinoma and the presence of a sonographic correlate.

Conclusions

Second-look US is a reliable problemsolving tool in identifying and characterising most incidental MRI findings. It contributes to accurately selecting the cases in which MRI-guided biopsy is required.

Riassunto

Obiettivo

Lo scopo del lavoro è stato verificare l’utilità del second look ecografico nella identificazione e nella tipizzazione delle lesioni incidentali alla risonanza magnetica (RM) mammaria.

Materiali e metodi

È stata effettuata un’analisi retrospettiva di 62 lesioni identificate incidentalmente dalla RM, non palpabili e occulte alla mammografia ed ecografia espletate prima della RM. L’impregnazione delle lesioni era tipo massa in 59 casi (95%) e non massa in 3 casi (5%). Quarantadue lesioni (68%) erano ≤10 mm; solo 3 lesioni (5%) erano >20 mm. Il grado di sospetto RM era alla classificazione breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) 5 in 6 casi (10%), BI-RADS 4 in 33 casi (53%), BI-RADS 3 in 23 casi (37%). Le lesioni RM con corrispettivo reperto al second look ecografico sono state analizzate riguardo: aspetto RM, dimensioni, sospetto radiologico, diagnosi istologica. Il gold standard è stato l’esame patologico o il follow-up clinico e strumentale a 24 mesi. I risultati sono stati analizzati con il test statistico di Fisher (significatività: p<0,05).

Risultati

Il second look ecografico ha identificato 44/62 (71%) lesioni incidentali alla RM mammaria. Il numero di lesioni identificate con il second-look è stato superiore in caso di impregnazione di tipo massa (75%), lesioni con dimensioni >10 mm (90%) e con BI-RADS 4 (88%). Dodici/44 (27%) lesioni identificate dal second look ecografico erano maligne e 5/18 (27%) lesioni prive di traduzione ecografica erano maligne. Il prelievo guidato dal second look ecografico ha caratterizato 12/17 (71%) lesioni maligne.

Conclusioni

Il second look ecografico è una valida metodica nel management delle lesioni identificate incidentalmente dalla RM mammaria in quanto consente l’identificazione e la caratterizzazione della maggioranza di esse e l’accurata selezione di quelle da avviare a procedure RM-guidate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References/Bibliografia

  1. Bartella L, Liberman L, Morris EA et al (2006) Nonpalpable mammographically occult invasive breast cancers detected by MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:865–870

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Liberman L (2004) Breast cancer screening with MRI — what are the data for patients at high risk? New Engl J Med 351:497–500

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Robson ME, Offit K (2004) Breast MRI for women with hereditary cancer risk. J Am Med Assoc 292:1368–1370

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Morris EA, Liberman L, Ballon DJ et al (2003) MRI of occult breast carcinoma in a high-risk population. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181:619–626

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Girardi V, Carbognin G, Camera L et al (2010) Fischer’s score criteria correlating with histopathological prognostic factors in invasive breast cancer. Radiol Med, 115:421–433

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mann RM, Hoogeveen YL, Blickman JG et al (2008) MRI compared to conventional diagnostic work-up in the detection and evaluation of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: a review of existing literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat 107:1–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Orel SG, Schnall MD (2001) MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology 220:13–30

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sardanelli F, Giuseppetti GM, Canavese G, et al (2008) Indications for breast magnetic resonance imaging. Consensus document “Attualità in senologia”, Florence 2007. Radiol Med 113:1085–1095

    Google Scholar 

  9. Peters NH, Borel Rinkes IH, Zuithoff NP (2008) Meta-analysis of MR imaging in the diagnosis of breast lesions. Radiology 246:116–124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Teifke A, Lehr HA, Vomweg TW (2003) Outcome analysis and rational management of enhancing lesions incidentally detected on contrastenhanced MRI of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181:655–662

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Brown J, Smith RC, Lee CH (2001) Incidental enhancing lesions found on MR imaging of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:1249–1254

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lagios MD (1977) Multicentricity of breast carcinoma demonstrated by routine correlated serial subgross and radiographic examination. Cancer 40:1726–1734

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Holland R, Veling SH, Mravunac M et al (1985) Histologic multifocality of Tis, T1-2 breast carcinomas: Implications for clinical trials of breastconserving surgery. Cancer 56:979–990

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Vaidya JS, Vyas JJ, Chinoy RF et al (1996) Multicentricity of breast cancer: Whole-organ analysis and clinical implications. Br J Cancer 74:820–824

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rosen PP, Fracchia AA, Urban JA et al (1975) ’Residual’ mammary carcinoma following simulated partial mastectomy. Cancer 35:739–747

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill et al (2008) Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:3248–3258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Braun M, Pölcher M, Schrading S et al (2008) Influence of preoperative MRI on the surgical management of patients with operable breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 111:179–187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. American College of Radiology (ACR) (2003) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Atlas (BI-RADS® Atlas). American College of Radiology, Reston

    Google Scholar 

  19. Morris EA (2006) Breast MR imaging lexicon updated. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 14:293–303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Sinnatamby R, Lebeau A et al (2008) Consensus Group. Interdisciplinary consensus on the uses and technique of MR-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VAB): results of a European consensus meeting. Eur J Radiol 72:289–294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. LaTrenta LR, Menell JH, Morris EA et al (2003) Breast lesions detected with MR imaging: utility and histopathologic importance of identification with US. Radiology 227:856–861

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Beran L, Liang W, Nims T et al (2005) Correlation of targeted ultrasound with magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities of the breast. Am J Surg 190:592–594

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sim LS, Hendriks JH, Bult P et al (2005) US correlation for MRI-detected breast lesions in women with familial risk of breast cancer. Clin Radiol 60:801–806

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wiratkapun C, Duke D, Nordmann AS et al (2008) Indeterminate or suspicious breast lesions detected initially with MR imaging: value of MRI-directed breast ultrasound. Acad Radiol 15:618–625

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Linda A, Zuiani C, Londero V et al (2008) Outcome of initially only magnetic resonance mammographydetected findings with and without correlate at second-look sonography: distribution according to patient history of breast cancer and lesion size. Breast 17:51–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. DeMartini WB, Eby PR, Peacock S, Lehman CD (2009) Utility of targeted sonography for breast lesions that were suspicious on MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:1128–1134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Istituto di Radiologia, Policlinico “G.B. Rossi”, P.le L.A. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy

    G. Carbognin, V. Girardi, C. Calciolari, A. Brandalise & A. Russo

  2. Dipartimento di Patologia, Policlinico “G.B. Rossi”, P.le L.A. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy

    F. Bonetti

Authors
  1. G. Carbognin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. V. Girardi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C. Calciolari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. Brandalise
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. F. Bonetti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. A. Russo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. R. Pozzi Mucelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Girardi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carbognin, G., Girardi, V., Calciolari, C. et al. Utility of second-look ultrasound in the management of incidental enhancing lesions detected by breast MR imaging. Radiol med 115, 1234–1245 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-010-0561-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-010-0561-9

Keywords

Parole chiave

Search

Navigation