Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Strategies of endoleak management following endoluminal treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms in 95 patients: how, when and why

Strategie di trattamento degli endoleak dopo esclusione di aneurisma dell’aorta addominale mediante endoprotesi in 95 pazienti: come, quando e perché

  • Vascular and Interventional Radiology/Radiologia Vascolare ed Interventistica
  • Published:
La radiologia medica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study reviews, on the basis of our experience, the indications and options for treating endoleaks (EL) after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) by endografting.

Materials and methods

Ninety-five patients (M/F =92/3; mean age at time of operation 70.7±7.8 years) who underwent endovascular repair of infrarenal AAA between April 1997 and October 2004 were considered. All images of 420 pre-and postoperative computed tomography (CT) studies were reviewed.

Results

A total of 37 EL occurred in 33/95 patients (34.7%), four of whom had two EL of different types. Eighteen EL were treated, 16 by endoluminal treatment. Six EL were type I: 2 were treated by percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and 4 by cuff deployment (2 proximal cuffs and 2 distal cuffs). Eight EL were type II: 2 were treated by PTA, 2 by cuff deployment, 1 by transcatheter coil embolisation of the inferior mesenteric artery, two by thrombin injection in the aneurysm sac and one underwent surgical conversion during an attempt to treat a concomitant type I EL. Finally, 2 EL were type III: 1 was treated by PTA and 1 by cuff deployment. Endovascular treatment was successful in 12/16 cases (75%), whereas 3/16 cases (18.8%) were converted to open surgery, and 1 patient died of AAA rupture the day after endovascular repair.

Conclusions

EL is the most common complication after endovascular repair of AAA. In type I and type III EL, treatment is mandatory, whereas in type II (and type V) EL, treatment is indicated in the presence of AAA enlargement. Type IV EL generally disappear spontaneously. Endovascular repair is feasible and can be performed with different techniques according to EL aetiology, but it is not always decisive, and in some cases surgical conversion is required.

Riassunto

Obiettivo

Revisionare, in base alla nostra esperienza, le indicazioni e le opzioni terapeutiche per il trattamento degli endoleak (EL) successivi al trattamento endovascolare degli aneurismi dell’aorta addominale (AAA) mediante endoprotesi (EP).

Materiali e metodi

Sono stati considerati retrospettivamente 95 pazienti consecutivi (M/F=92/3; età media al momento dell’impianto 70,7±7,8 anni) sottoposti nel periodo aprile 1997-ottobre 2004 ad impianto di EP per esclusione di AAA infrarenale. Sono state revisionate le immagini di 420 esami TC eseguiti sia in fase preoperatoria che postoperatoria.

Risultati

In 33/95 (34,7%) dei pazienti si sono verificati complessivamente 37 EL, essendovi stati 4 pazienti con 2 EL di tipo diverso. Fra questi, 18 EL hanno richiesto trattamento, di cui 16 per via endovascolare. Sei EL erano di tipo I: 2 sono stati trattati con PTA e 4 con il posizionamento di cuffie (2 prossimali e 2 distali). Otto EL erano di tipo II: 2 sono stati trattati con PTA, 2 con il posizionamento di una cuffia iliaca, 1 con embolizzazione transcatetere dell’arteria mesenterica inferiore, 2 con iniezione di trombina all’interno della sacca aneurismatica e in un caso, associato anche ad EL di tipo I, nel tentativo di trattamento di quest’ultimo, si è ricorsi a conversione chirurgica. Infine 2 EL erano di tipo III: 1 è stato trattato con PTA e 1 con il posizionamento di una cuffia iliaca. Il tasso di successo tecnico è stato del 75% (12/16 EL), essendovi stata necessità di conversione chirurgica in 3/16 casi (18,8%) ed essendo un paziente deceduto il giorno successivo al trattamento endovascolare per rottura dell’AAA.

Conclusioni

L’EL rappresenta una delle complicanze più frequenti dopo trattamento endovascolare di AAA. Sono sempre candidati al trattamento gli EL graft-correlati (tipi I e III), mentre gli EL di tipo II (e tipo V) devono essere trattati solo se associati a crescita dimensionale dell’AAA. Gli EL di tipo IV solitamente si risolvono con regressione spontanea. Il trattamento endovascolare è possibile secondo diverse modalità in base all’eziologia dell’EL, ma non sempre è risolutivo e talvolta è necessario ricorrere alla conversione chirurgica.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References/Bibliografia

  1. Rabbia C, Fattori R, Maglione F (2003) Le endoprotesi aortiche. In: Documenti SIRM 2003, Società Italiana di Radiologia Medica, Supplemento a Il Radiologo 4:3–12

    Google Scholar 

  2. White GH, Yu W, May J et al (1997) Endoleak as a complication of endoluminal grafting of abdominal aortic aneurysms: classification, incidence, diagnosis and management. J Endovasc Surg 4:152–168

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gorich J, Rilinger N, Soldner J et al (1999) Endovascular repair of aortic aneurysm: treatment of complications. J Endovasc Surg 6:136–146

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chuter TA, Faruqi RM, Sawhney R et al (2001) Endoleak after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 34:98–105

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Buth J, Laheij RJ (2000) Early complications and endoleaks after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: report of a multicenter study. J Vasc Surg 31:134–146

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. White GH, Yu W, May J (1996) “Endoleak”: a proposed new terminology to describe incomplete aneurysm exclusion by an endoluminal graft. J Endovasc Surg 3:124–125

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Van Marrewijk C, Buth J, Harris PL et al (2002) Significance of endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: the EUROSTAR experience. J Vasc Surg 35:461–473

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gilling-Smith GL, Martin J, Sudhindran S et al (2000) Freedom from endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair does not equal treatment success. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 19:412–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Frego M, Bianchera G, Kontothanassis D et al (2003) Morphological and functional modifications of the aneurysm-endograft complex following endoluminal exclusions in 30 consecutive cases. Acta Biomed Ateneo Parmense [74 suppl] 2:45–50

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fittà C, Miotto D, Barbiero G et al (2006) Morphological and functional modifications of the aneurysmendograft complex following endoluminal treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Radiol Med 111:931–948

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. White GH, May J, Waugh RC et al (1998) Type III and type IV endoleak: toward a complete definition of blood flow in the sac after endoluminal AAA repair. J Endovasc Surg 5:305–309

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. White GH, May J, Petrasek P et al (1999) Endotension: an explanation for continued AAA growth after successful endoluminal repair. J Endovasc Surg 6:308–315

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wain RA, Marin ML, Ohki T et al (1998) Endoleaks after endovascular graft treatment of aortic aneurysms: classification, risk factors, and outcome. J Vasc Surg 27:69–78

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gilling-Smith GL, Brennan J, Harris PL et al (1999) Endotension after endovascular aneurysm repair: definition, classification and implications for surveillance and intervention. J Endovasc Surg 6:305–307

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dubenec SR, White GH, Pasenau J et al (2000) Endotension. A review of current views on patophysiology and treatment. J Cardiovasc Surg 44:553–557

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mehta M, Veith FJ, Ohki T et al (2003) Significance of endotension, endoleak and aneurysm pulsatility after endovascular repair. J Vasc Surg 37:842–846

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Simonetti G, Gandini G, Inglese L et al (2000) Abdominal aortic aneurysms: guidelines for patients selection and follow-up management. Italian TEAM (Transfemoral Endovascular Aneurysm Management). Radiol Med 99:22–25

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rozenblit AM, Patlas M, Rosenbaum AT et al (2003) Detection of endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: value of unenhanced and delayed helical CT acquisition. Radiology 227:426–433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Faries PL, Cadot H, Agarwal G et al (2003) Management of endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair: cuffs, coils, and conversion. J Vasc Surg 37:1155–1161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hobo R, Buth J, EUROSTAR collaborators (2006) Secondary interventions following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair using current endografts. A EUROSTAR report. J Vasc Surg 43:896–902

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Karch LA, Henretta JP, Hodgson KJ et al (1999) Algorithm for the diagnosis and treatment of endoleaks. Am J Surg 178:225–231

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Golzarian J, Maes EB, Sun S (2005) Endoleak: treatment options. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 8:41–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pozzi Mucelli F, Doddi M, Bruni S et al (2007) Endovascular treatment of endoleaks after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: personal experience. Radiol Med 112:409–419

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Arko FR, Rubin GD, Johnson BL et al (2001) Type II endoleaks following endovascular AAA repair: preoperative predictors and long-term effects. J Endovasc Ther 8:503–510

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Baum RA, Carpenter JP, Tuite CM et al (2000) Diagnosis and treatment of inferior mesenteric arterial endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Radiology 215:409–413

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Khilnani NM, Sos TA, Trost DW et al (1996) Embolization of backbleeding lumbar arteries filling an aortic aneurysm sac after endovascular stentgraft placement. J Vasc Int Rad 7:813–817

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Van den Berg JC, Tutein Nolthenius RP, Casparie JWBM et al (2000) CTguided thrombin injection into aneurysm sac in a patient with endoleak after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175:1649–1651

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dipartimento di Scienze Medico-Diagnostiche e Terapie Speciali, Sezione di Radiologia, Università di Padova, Padova, Italy

    G. Barbiero, A. Baratto, F. Ferro, J. Dall’Acqua, C. Fittà & D. Miotto

Authors
  1. G. Barbiero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Baratto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. F. Ferro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J. Dall’Acqua
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. C. Fittà
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. D. Miotto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Barbiero.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barbiero, G., Baratto, A., Ferro, F. et al. Strategies of endoleak management following endoluminal treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms in 95 patients: how, when and why. Radiol med 113, 1029–1042 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-008-0317-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-008-0317-y

Keywords

Parole chiave

Search

Navigation