Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Congenital anomalies and variations of the bile and pancreatic ducts: magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography findings, epidemiology and clinical significance

Varianti ed anomalie congenite delle vie biliari e pancreatiche: aspetti colangiopancreato-RM, epidemiologia e significato clinico

  • Abdominal Radiology/Radiologia Addominale
  • Published:
La radiologia medica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The objective of this paper is to document the magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) findings and the epidemiology of congenital anomalies and variations of the bile and pancreatic ducts and to discuss their clinical significance.

Materials and methods

Three-hundred and fifty patients of both sexes (150 females, 200 males, age range 0–76 years, average age 38 years) underwent MRCP for clinically suspected lithiasic, neoplastic or inflammatory disease of the bile and pancreatic ducts. Patients were imaged with a 1.5-T superconductive magnet (Magnetom Vision, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany), a four-channel phased-array body coil, breath-hold technique, with multislice T2-weighted half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin echo (HASTE), MIP reconstructions, and a single-shot T2-weighted turbo-spin-echo sequence rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement (RARE) with different slice thicknesses. Studies in oncological patients were completed with fat saturation 3D T1 gradient-echo sequences during the intravenous injection of gadolinium diethylene triamine pentaacetate acid (DTPA) (0.2 ml/kg).

Results

MRCP demonstrated recurrent and therefore normal bile and pancreatic ducts in 57% of patients. In the remaining 42.3%, it documented anatomical variants (41%) and congenital anomalies (1.3%). Variants of the intrahepatic bile duct were seen in 21% of cases: crossover anomaly (6.7%), anterior branch of the right hepatic duct draining the IV and VII segments that flow together with the left bile duct (3.1%) and anterior and posterior branches of the right hepatic duct that flow together with the common hepatic duct (3.3%). Variants of the extrahepatic bile ducts were present in 8.8% of patients: low insertion of the cystic duct into the common hepatic duct (4.5%), emptying of the cystic duct into the right hepatic duct (2.7%) and a second-order large branch draining into the cystic duct (1.6%). MRCP identified a double gall bladder in 3% of patients and anatomical variants of the biliopancreatic system in 8.2%: pancreas divisum (5.2%) and a long sphincter of Oddi (3%). Finally, congenital anomalies were diagnosed in 1.3% of cases: bile duct cysts (0.3%), atresia of the bile ducts (0.3%) and multiple biliary hamartomatosis (0.7%).

Conclusions

The congenital anomalies and anatomical variants of the bile and pancreatic ducts present a complex spectrum of frequent alterations, which are worthy of attention in both the clinical and surgical settings and are readily identified by MRCP.

Riassunto

Obiettivo

Documentare gli aspetti colangiopancreato-RM (CPRM), valutare l’epidemiologia e discutere il significato clinico delle varianti e delle anomalie congenite delle vie biliari e pancreatiche.

Materiali e metodi

Trecentocinquanta pazienti di entrambi i sessi (150 F e 200 M; range di età 0-76 anni, età media 38 anni) sono stati sottoposti a CPRM per i sospetti clinici di patologia litiasica, neoplastica e flogistica delle vie biliari e pancreatiche. È stato impiegato un magnete superconduttivo da 1,5 T con bobina body phased-array a quattro canali, tecnica breath-hold, acquisizioni half-fourier con T2-W (HASTE) multislice, ricostruzioni MIP, e single shot T2-W turbo-spin-echo (RARE) con differente spessore di strato. Alcuni esami, in pazienti oncologici, sono stati completati con sequenze gradient echo 3D T1w fat-sat durante somministrazione in vena periferica di mezzo di contrasto gadolinium-DTPA (0,2 ml/kg).

Risultati

La CPRM ha documentato vie biliari e pancreatiche ricorrenti e pertanto considerate normali nel 57,7% dei pazienti; nel restante 42,3% ha rilevato varianti anatomiche (41%) ed anomalie congenite (1,3%). Nel 21% dei casi le varianti interessavano le vie biliari intraepatiche: crossover anomaly (6,7%), dotto bisegmentario anteriore destro confluente nel dotto biliare di sinistra (3,1%), dotto bisegmentario posteriore destro confluente nel dotto epatico sinistro (7,9%) e nel dotto epatico comune (3,3%). La presenza di varianti anatomiche delle vie biliari extraepatiche è stata riscontrata nell’8,8% dei pazienti: bassa inserzione del dotto cistico nel dotto epatico comune (4,5%), sbocco del dotto cistico nel dotto epatico destro (2,7%), grosso ramo di secondo ordine drenante nel dotto cistico (1,6%). La CPRM ha identificato un 3% di pazienti con colecisti doppia ed un 8,2% di pazienti con varianti anatomiche del sistema bilio-pancreatico: pancreas divisum (5,2%) e sfintere di Oddi lungo (3%). Infine anomalie congenite sono state diagnosticate nell’1,3% dei casi: cisti coledocica (0,3%), atresia delle vie biliari (0,3%) ed amartomatosi biliare multipla (0,7%).

Conclusioni

Le anomalie congenite e le varianti anatomiche delle vie biliari e pancreatiche costituiscono uno spettro complesso di frequenti alterazioni, documentabili agevolmente in CPRM e meritevoli di attenzione in ambito sia clinico sia chirurgico.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Puente SG, Bannura GC (1983) Radiological anatomy of the biliary tract: variations and congenital abnormalities. World J Surg 7:271–276

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mortele KJ, Rocha TC, Streeter JL, Taylor AJ (2006) Multimodality imaging of pancreatic and biliary congenital anomalies. Radiographics 26:716–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Klein SD, Affronti JP (2004) Pancreas divisum, an evidence-based review: part I, pathophysiology. Gastrointest Endoscop 60:419–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gregg JA (1977) Pancreas divisum: its association with pancreatitis. Am J Surg134:539–542

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cotton PB (1980) Congenital anomaly of pancreas divisum as a cause of obstructive pain and pancreatis. Gut 21:105–114

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mortelé KJ, Wiesner W, Silverman SG et al (2004) Asyntomatic non-specific serum hyperamylasemia ad hyperlipasemia spectrum: of MRCP findings and clinical implication. Abdom Imaging 29:109–114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yu J, Turner MA, Fulcher AS, Halvorsen RA (2006) Congenital anomalies and normal variants of the pancreatico biliary tract and the pancreas in adults: part I biliary tract. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:1536–1543

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Filippone A, Ambrosiani R, Fuschi M et al (2003) Impatto clinico della colangiopancreatografia a risonanza magnetica nei pazienti con patologia biliare. Radiol Med 105:27–35

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kim SH, Lim JH, Yoon H-K et al (2000) Choledochal cyst: comparison of MR and conventional cholangiography. Clinical Radiology 55:378–383

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Soto JA, Barish MA, Yucel EK et al (1996) Magnetic resonance cholangiography: comparison with endoscopic retrograde colangiopancreatografy. Grastroenterology110:589–597

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Little AF, Smith PJ, Lee WK et al (1999) Imaging of the normal and abnormal pancreatico-biliary system with single-shot MR Cholangiopancreatografy; a pictorial review. Australasian Radiology 43:427–434

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cohen A (1989) Comparison of correlated correlations. Stat Med 8:1485–1495

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kamisawa T, Tu Y, Egawa N et al (2006) MRCP of congenital pancreaticobiliary malformations. Abdom Imaging (Epub ahead of print)

  15. Suhocki PV, Meyers WC (1999) Injury to aberrant bile duct during colecystectomy: a common cause of diagnostic error and treatment delay. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172:955–959

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Varotti G, Gondolesi GE, Goldman J et al (2004) Anatomic variations in right liver living donors. J Am Coll Surg 198:577–583

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cova M, Stacul F, Cester G et al (2003) Colangiopancreatografia con RM-confronto tra sequenza 2D single-shot fast spin echo e sequenze 3D fast spin echo. Radiol Med 106:178–190

    Google Scholar 

  18. Larobina M, Nottle PD (2005) Extrahepatic biliary anatomy et laparoscopic colecystectomy: is aberrant anatomy important. ANZ J Surg 75:392–395

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Izuishi K, Toyama Y, Nakano S et al (2005) Preoperative assessment of the aberrant bile duct using multislice computed tomography cholangiography. Am J Surg189:53–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gigot J-F, Van Beers B, Goncette L et al (1997) Laparoscopic treatment of gallbladder duplication. Surg Endosc 11:479–482

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mazziotti S, Minutoli F, Blandino A et al (2001) Gallbladder duplication: MR colangiography demonstration. Abdom Imaging 26:287–289

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ozgen A, Akata D, Arat A et al (1999) Gallbladder duplication: Imaging Findings and differential considerations. Abdom Imaging 24:285–288

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Vitellas KM, Keogan MT, Spritzer CE, Nelson RC (2000) MR cholangiopancreatogafy of bile and pancreatic duct abnormalities with emphasis on the single-shot fast spinecho technique. Radiographics 20:939–957

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Giacomoni A, Lauterio A, Slim AO et al (2006) Biliary complications after living donor adult liver transplantation. Transplant International 19:466–473

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Weyant MJ, Maluccio MA, Bertagnolli MM, Daly JM (1998) Choledochal cyst in adults. Am J Gastroenterol 93:2580–2583

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Orlandi PE, Imbriani M, Mattioli R et al (2002) Multiple biliary hamartomas (von Meyenburg complex). A case report. Radiol Med 103:418–420

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Fu P-F, Yu J-R, Liu XS et al (2005) Symptomatic adult annular pancreas: report of two cases and a review of the literature. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 4:468–471

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. De Filippo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Filippo, M., Calabrese, M., Quinto, S. et al. Congenital anomalies and variations of the bile and pancreatic ducts: magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography findings, epidemiology and clinical significance. Radiol med 113, 841–859 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-008-0298-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-008-0298-x

Key words

Parole chiave

Navigation