Abstract
A field experiment was conducted to assess the effect of straw mulching and irrigation scheduling on water balance, economics and energetics of potato during 2013–2014 and 2014–2015. The experiment was laid out in a split plot design with mulch levels (no mulch and mulch 6.25 t ha−1) in the main plots and four irrigation schedules {ridge planting furrow irrigation (RPFI), bed planting furrow irrigation (BPFI), ridge planting drip irrigation (RPDI) and bed planting drip irrigation (BPDI)} in the subplots. Straw mulching resulted in 19.0% higher potato tuber yield than no mulch as a result of 36.2 mm higher transpiration and 44.2 mm lower soil evaporation. Energy productivity (EP) and energy use efficiency (EUE) were also significantly higher with straw mulch than no mulch with US$498 ha−1 higher net returns in pooled data of both years. Drip irrigation of beds and ridges resulted in 34.9% and 26.4% higher tuber yields, respectively, than furrow irrigation along with savings of 23.3 and 53.3 mm irrigation water, respectively. Seasonal transpiration was 31.0 and 31.7% higher in ridge- and bed-planted drip-irrigated crops, respectively, than furrow-irrigated crops in pooled data. Apparent and real water productivities were significantly higher in drip irrigated crops compared to furrow irrigated crops. RPDI and BPDI crops gave US$612 and US$876 ha−1 higher net returns with 35.7 and 28.8% higher EUE than RPFI and BPFI, respectively.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration—guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome
Alva AK, Hodges T, Boydston RA, Collins HP (2002) Effect of irrigation and tillage practices on yields of potato under high production conditions in the pacific northwest. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 133:1451–1460
Brar SK, Mahal SS, Brar AS, Vashist KK, Sharma N, Buttar GS (2012) Transplanting time and seedling age affect water productivity, rice yield and quality in north-west India. Agric Water Manag 115:217–222
Brar AS, Buttar GS, Sharma R (2018) Water and energy productivity of rice as influenced by duration of cultivars, dates of transplanting and irrigation regime in north-western India. Paddy Water Environ 16:655–663
Burlingame B, Mouille B, Charrondiere R (2009) Nutrients, bioactive non-nutrients and anti-nutrients in potatoes. J Food Compos Anal 22:494–502
Demircan V, Ekinci K, Keener MH, Akbolat D, Ekinci C (2006) Energy and economic analysis of sweet cherry production in Turkey: a case study from Isparata province. Energy Convers Manag 47:1761–1769
Döll P (2009) Vulnerability to the impact of climate change on renewable groundwater resources: a global-scale assessment. Special issue: focus on groundwater resources, climate and vulnerability. Environ Res Lett 4:1–12
Esengun K, Gunduz O, Erdal G (2007) Input-output energy analysis in dry apricot production of Turkey. Energy Convers Manag 48:592–598
Essah SYC, Honeycutt CW (2004) Tillage and seed sprouting strategies to improve potato yield and quality in short season climate. Am J Potato Res 81:177–186
FAOSTAT (2017) FAO statistical database. http://faostat3.fao.org/home/index.html#DOWNLOAD. Accessed 23 Aug 2017
Gundogmus E (2006) Energy use on organic farming: a comparative analysis on organic versus conventional apricot production on small holding in Turkey. Energy Convers Manag 47:3351–3359
Han M, Zhao C, Feng G, Yan Y, Sheng Y (2015) Evaluating the effects of mulch and irrigation amount on soil water distribution and root zone water balance using HYDRUS-2D. Water 7:2622–2640
Kaur A, Brar AS (2016) Influence of mulching and irrigation scheduling on productivity and water use of turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) in north-western India. Irrig Sci 34:261–269
King BA, Tarkalson DD, Bjorneberg DL, Taberna JP Jr (2011) Planting configuration effect on yield response of russet Norkotah to irrigation and nitrogen under high application rate sprinkler irrigation. Am J Potato Res 88:799–802
Kumari S (2012) Influence of drip irrigation and mulch on leaf area maximization, water use efficiency and yield of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). J Agric Sci 4:71–80
Li SX, Wang ZH, Li SQ, Goa YJ, Tian XH (2013) Effect of plastic sheet mulch, wheat straw mulch and maize growth on water loss by evaporation in dryland area of China. Agric Water Manag 116:39–49
Maraux F, Lafolie F (1998) Modelling soil water balance of a maize-sorghum sequence. Soil Sci Soc Am J 62:75–82
Mohammadi A, Tabatabaeefar A, Shahin SH, Rafiee SH, Keyhani A (2008) Energy use and economical analysis of potato production in Iran a case study: Ardabil province. Energy Convers Manag 49:3566–3570
Panesar BS, Bhatnagar AP (1994) Energy norms for inputs and outputs of agricultural sector. In: Energy management and conservation in agricultural production and food processing, USG Publisher & Distributors, Ludhiana, pp 5–16
Panigrahi B, Roy DP, Panda SN (2010) Water use and yield response of tomato as influenced by drip and furrow irrigation. Int Agric Eng J 19:1–12
Rana RK (2011) Status of Punjab state in Indian potato processing industry. Indian J Agril Mktg 25:1–17
Sahoo P, Brar AS, Sharma S (2018) Effect of methods of irrigation and sulphur nutrition on seed yield, economic and bio-physical water productivity of two sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) hybrids. Agric Water Manag 206:158–164
Sandhu SS, Mahal SS, Vashist KK, Buttar GS, Brar AS, Singh M (2012) Crop and water productivity of bed transplanted rice as influenced by various levels of nitrogen and irrigation in Northwest India. Agric Water Manag 104:32–39
Sethi RR, Mandal KG, Sarangi A, Behra A, Aggarwal R, Brar AS, Sahu AS, Bandyopadhyay KK, Ambast SK (2016) Simulating paddy crop response to irrigation using FAO AquaCrop model: a case study. J Food Agric Environ 14:99–103
Singh KB, Jalota SK, Gupta RK (2015) Soil water balance and response of spring maize (Zea mays) to mulching and differential irrigation in Punjab. Indian J Agron 60:279–284
Tarkalson DD, King BA, Bjorneberg DL, Taberna JP Jr (2011) Evaluation of in-row plant spacing and planting configuration for irrigated Russet Burbank, Russet Norkotah and Ranger Russet potatoes. Am J Potato Res 88:201–217
UNWWD (2008) United Nations world water day report http://www.unwater.org/. Accessed 22 March 2008
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India, New Delhi, for providing financial assistance to carry out these investigations in the form of PURSE Project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brar, A.S., Buttar, G.S., Thind, H.S. et al. Improvement of Water Productivity, Economics and Energetics of Potato through Straw Mulching and Irrigation Scheduling in Indian Punjab. Potato Res. 62, 465–484 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-019-9423-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-019-9423-6