Abstract
We develop a novel eco-evolutionary modelling framework and demonstrate its efficacy by simulating the evolution of trait distributions in predator and prey populations. The eco-evolutionary modelling framework assumes that population traits have beta distributions and defines canonical equations for the dynamics of each total population size, the population’s average trait value, and a measure of the population’s trait differentiation. The trait differentiation is included in the modelling framework as a phenotype analogue, Q, of Wright’s fixation index \(F_\mathrm{ST}\), which is inversely related to the sum of the beta distribution shape parameters. The canonical equations may be used as templates to describe the evolution of population trait distributions in many ecosystems that are subject to stabilising selection. The solutions of the “population model” are compared with those of a “phenotype model” that simulates the growth of each phenotype as it interacts with every other phenotype under the same trade-offs. The models assume no sources of new phenotypic variance, such as mutation or gene flow. We examine a predator–prey system in which each population trades off growth against mortality: the prey optimises devoting resources to growth or defence against predation; and the predator trades off increasing its attack rate against increased mortality. Computer solutions with stabilising selection reveal very close agreement between the phenotype and population model results, which both predict that evolution operates to stabilise an initially oscillatory system. The population model reduces the number of equations required to simulate the eco-evolutionary system by several orders of magnitude, without losing verisimilitude for the overarching population properties. The population model also allows insights into the properties of the system that are not available from the equivalent phenotype model.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
References
Abrams P (1991) The effects of interacting species on predator–prey coevolution. Theor Pop Biol 39:241–262
Balding D, Nichols R (1995) A method for quantifying differentiation between populations at multi-allelic loci and its implications for investigating identity and paternity. Genetica 96(1–2):3–12
Berardo C, Geritz S (2021) Coevolution of the reckless prey and the patient predator. J Theor Biol 530:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2021.110873
Bulmer M (1971) The effect of selection on genetic variability. Am Naturalist 105(943):201–211
Coutinho R, Klauschies T, Gaedke U (2016) Bimodal trait distributions with large variances question the reliability of trait-based aggregate models. Theor Ecol 9:389–408
Cropp R, Norbury J (2015) Population interactions in ecology: a rule-based approach to modeling ecosystems in a mass-conserving framework. SIAM Rev 57(3):437–465
Cropp R, Norbury J (2019) Obligate mutualism in a resource-based framework. SIAM Rev 61(2):596–622
Cropp R, Norbury J (2021) The eco-evolutionary modelling of populations and their traits using a measure of trait differentiation. J Theor Biol 531(110893):1–24
Cropp R, Norbury J (2021) Modelling the evolution of naturally-bounded traits in a population. Theor Ecol 14(2):255–268
Fisher R (1930) The genetical theory of natural selection. The Clarendon Press, Oxford
Fleischer S, terHorst C, Li J (2018) Pick your trade-offs wisely: predator–prey eco-evo dynamics are qualitatively different under different trade-offs. J Theor Biol 456:201–212
Geritz S, Kisdl E, Meszena G, Metz J (1998) Evolutionarily singular strategies and the adaptive growth and branching of the evolutionary tree. Evolu Ecol 12:35–57
Gibert J, Yeakel J (2019) Eco-evolutionary origins of diverse abundance, biomass, and trophic structures in food webs. Front Ecol Evol 7(15):1–11
Gilpin W, Feldman M (2017) A phase transition induces chaos in a predator-prey ecosystem with a dynamic fitness landscape. PLOS Comput Biol 13(7):e1005644
Govaert L, Fronhofer E, Lion S, Eizaguirre C, Bonte D, Egas M, Hendry A, De Brito Martins A, Melian C, Raeymaekers J, Ratikainen I, Saether B, Schweitzer J, Matthews B (2019) Eco-evolutionary feedbacks -theoretical models and perspectives. Funct Ecol 33:13–30
Holling C (1965) The functional response of predators to prey density and its role in mimicry and population regulation. Memoirs Entomol Soc Canada 45:3–60
Kasada M, Yamamichi M, Yoshida T (2014) Form of an evolutionary tradeoff affects eco- evolutionary dynamics in a predator-prey system. PNAS 111(45):16035–16040
Khater M, Murariu D, Gras R (2016) Predation risk tradeoffs in prey: effects on energy and behaviour. Theor Ecol 9:251–268
Klauschies T, Coutinho R, Gaedke U (2018) A beta distribution-based moment closure enhances the reliability of trait-based aggregate models for natural populations and communities. Ecol Model 381:46–77
Klausmeier C, Kremer C, Koffel T (2020) Trait-based ecological and eco-evolutionary theory. Oxford University Press, chap 11:161–194
Kolmogorov A (1936) Sulla teoria di volterra della lotka per l’esisttenza. Giornale dell Instituto Italiano Degli Attuari 7:74–80
Kuehn C (2015) Moment closure - a brief review. Springer Complexity, chap 13:253–271
Lande R (1976) Natural selection and random genetic drift in phenotype evolution. Evolution 30:314–334
Le Quere C, Harrison S, Prentice I, Buitenhuis E, Aumont O, Bopp L, Claustre H, Da Cunha L, Geider R, Giraud X, Klaas C, Kohfeld K, Legendre L, Manizza M, Platt T, Rivkin R, Sathyendranath S, Uitz J, Watson A, Wolf-Gladrow D (2005) Ecosystem dynamics based on plankton functional types for global ocean biogeochemistry models. Glob Change Biol 11(11):2016–2040
Levin S, Udovic J (1977) A mathematical model of coevolving populations. Am Naturalist 111(980):657–675
Loreau M (2010) From populations to ecosystems, monographs in population biology, vol 46. Princeton University Press, Woodstock, Oxfordshire
McCauley D, Gellner G, Martinez N, Williams R, Sandin S, Micheli F, Mumby P, McCann K (2018) On the prevalence and dynamics of inverted trophic pyramids and otherwise top-heavy communities. Ecol Lett 21(3):439–454
Merico A, Bruggeman B, Wirtz K (2009) A trait-based approach for downscaling complexity in plankton ecosystem models. Ecol Model 220:3001–3010
Nei M (1973) Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. PNAS 70(12):3321–3323
Norberg J, Swaney D, Dushoff J, Lin J, Casagrandi R, Levin S (2001) Phenotypic diversity and ecosystem functioning in changing environments: A theoretical framework. PNAS 98(20):11376–11381
Patel S, Buerger R (2019) Eco-evolutionary feedbacks between predator’s linkage disequilibrium and prey densities maintain diversity. Evolution 73(8):1533–1548
Patel S, Cortez M, Schreiber S (2018) Partitioning the effects of ecology, evolution, and eco-evolutionary feedbacks on community stability. Am Naturalist 191:381–394
Ronce O, Kirkpatrick M (2001) When sources become sinks: migrational meltdown in heterogeneous habitats. Evolution 55(8):1520–1531
Rosenzweig M, MacArthur R (1963) Graphical representation and stability conditions of predator-prey interaction. Am Naturalist 97:209–223
Schiesser W (2017) Numer Method Lines. Academic Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Schoener T (2011) The newest synthesis: understanding the interplay of evolutionary and ecological dynamics. Science 331:426–429
Shnol E, Kondrashov A (1993) The effect of selection on the phenotypic variance. Genetics 134:995–996
Spitze K (1993) Population structure in Daphnia obtusa: quantitative genetic and allozymic variation. Genetics 135:367–374
Stark J, Iannelli P, Baigent S (2001) A nonlinear dynamics perspective of moment closure for stochastic processes. Nonlinear Anal: Theory Methods Appl 47(2):753–764
Tien R, Ellner S (2012) Variable cost of prey defense and coevolution in predator-prey systems. Ecol Monographs 82(4):491–504
Van Kampen N (2007) Stochastic processes in physics and chemistry. Elsevier, Amsterdam
van Velzen E, Gaedke U (2017) Disentangling eco-evolutionary dynamics of predator–prey coevolution: the case of antiphase cycles. Sci Rep 7(17125):1–11
Vitousek P, Matson P (2012) Nutrient cycling and biogeochemistry. In: Levin S (ed) The Princeton guide to ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 330–339
Wilson D, Turelli M (1986) Stable underdominance and the evolutionary invasion of empty niches. Am Naturalist 127(6):835–850
Wright S (1950) Genetical structure of populations. Nature 166(4215):247–249
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank the reviewers for their careful reading and helpful comments which have significantly improved the original manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The authors contributed equally.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
Not applicable.
Conflicts of interests
All authors declare no conflict of interests.
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Code availability
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cropp, R., Norbury, J. Predator–Prey Evolution from an Eco-evolutionary Trade-off Model: The Role of Trait Differentiation. Bull Math Biol 84, 50 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-022-01004-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-022-01004-8