The Relative Contribution of Direct and Environmental Transmission Routes in Stochastic Avian Flu Epidemic Recurrence: An Approximate Analysis

  • May Anne Mata
  • Priscilla Greenwood
  • Rebecca Tyson
Special Issue: Mathematical Epidemiology


We present an analysis of an avian flu model that yields insight into the roles of different transmission routes in the recurrence of avian influenza epidemics. Recent modelling work suggests that the outbreak periodicity of the disease is mainly determined by the environmental transmission rate. This conclusion, however, is based on a modelling study that only considers a weak between-host transmission rate. We develop an approximate model for stochastic avian flu epidemics, which allows us to determine the relative contribution of environmental and direct transmission routes to the periodicity and intensity of outbreaks over the full range of plausible parameter values for transmission. Our approximate model reveals that epidemic recurrence is chiefly governed by the product of a rotation and a slowly varying standard Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process (i.e. mean-reverting process). The intrinsic frequency of the damped deterministic version of the system predicts the dominant period of outbreaks. We show that the typical periodicity of major avian flu outbreaks can be explained in terms of either or both types of transmission and that the typical amplitude of epidemics is highly sensitive to the direct transmission rate.


Avian influenza Disease transmission Recurrent epidemics Host pathogen model Stochastic SIR Sustained oscillations 



We gratefully acknowledge the BRAES institute at UBCO for supporting this work.

Author’s contributions MAM formulated the research problem, developed the methods of analysis, simulated and analysed the model, and drafted the manuscript; PEG and RCT evaluated the results and helped draft the manuscript. All authors gave final approval for publication.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. Alexander DJ (2000) A review of avian influenza in different bird species. Vet Microbiol.
  2. Alexander D J, Parsons G, Manvell R J (1986) Experimental assessment of the pathogenicity of eight avian influenza A viruses of H5 subtype for chickens, turkeys, ducks and quail. Avian Pathol J W.V.P.A 15(4):647–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen EJ, Allen LJ, Arciniega A, Greenwood PE (2008) Construction of equivalent stochastic differential equation models. Stoch Anal Appl 26:274–297MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Alonso D, McKane AJ, Pascual M (2007) Stochastic amplification in epidemics. J R Soc Interface 4(14):575–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aparicio JP, Solari HG (2001) Sustained oscillations in stochastic systems. Math Biosci 169(1):15–25MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Baxendale PH, Greenwood PE (2011) Sustained oscillations for density dependent Markov processes. J Math Biol 63(3):433–457MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Breban R, Drake JM (2009) The role of environmental transmission in recurrent avian influenza epidemics. PLoS Comp Biol 5(4):e1000346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Breban R, Drake JM, Stallknecht DE, Rohani P (2009) The role of environmental transmission in recurrent avian influenza epidemics Supporting Information. J Exp Biol 1–9Google Scholar
  9. Clancy CF, O’Callaghan MJA, Kelly TC (2006) A multi-scale problem arising in a model of avian flu virus in a seabird colony. J Phys Conf Ser 55:45–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Connor MB (1956) A historical survey of methods of solving cubic equations.
  11. Danø S, Sø rensen P G, Hynne F (1999) Sustained oscillations in living cells. Nature 402(6759):320–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dykman MI, McClintock PVE (1998) What can stochastic resonance do? Nature 391(6665):344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gang H, Ditzinger T, Ning CZ, Haken H (1993) Stochastic resonance without external periodic force. Phys Rev Lett 71(6):807–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Garamszegi LZ, Møller AP (2007) Prevalence of avian influenza and host ecology. Proc R Soc B 274(1621):2003–2012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gardiner CW (1986) Handbook of stochastic methods for physics, chemistry and the natural sciences. Applied Optics (vol. 25, p. 3145)Google Scholar
  16. Greenwood PE, Gordillo LF (2009) Stochastic epidemic modeling. Math Stat Estim Approaches Epidemiol 1–23.
  17. Greenwood PE, McDonnell MD, Ward LM (2014) Dynamics of gamma bursts in local field potentials. Neural ComputGoogle Scholar
  18. Herrick KA, Huettmann F, Lindgren MA (2013) A global model of avian influenza prediction in wild birds: the importance of northern regions. Veterinary Res 44:42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kim JK, Negovetich NJ (2009) Ducks: the Trojan horses of H5N1 influenza. Influ Respir Viruses 3(4):121–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Krauss S, Walker D, Pryor S P, Niles L, Chenghong L, Hinshaw V S, Webster R G (2004) Influenza A viruses of migrating wild aquatic birds in North America. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis (Larchmont, N.Y.) 4:177–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kurtz TG (1978) Strong approximation theorems for density dependent Markov chainsGoogle Scholar
  22. Kuske R, Gordillo LF, Greenwood P (2007) Sustained oscillations via coherence resonance in SIR. J Theor Biol 245(3):459–469MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. MATLAB (2010) Version 7.10.0 (R2010a). The MathWorks Inc., NatickGoogle Scholar
  24. McKane AJ, Nagy JD, Newman TJ, Stefanini MO (2007) Amplified biochemical oscillations in cellular systems. J Stat Phys 128(1–2):165–191MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. McKane AJ, Newman TJ (2005) Predator–prey cycles from resonant amplification of demographic stochasticity. Phys Rev Lett 94(21):4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mcnamara B (1989) Theory of stochastic resonance. Phys Rev A 39(9)Google Scholar
  27. Nisbet RM, Gurney W (1982) Modelling fluctuating populations. Wiley, HobokenMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. Øksendal B (2003) Stochastic differential equations.
  29. Olsen B, Munster VJ, Wallensten A (2006) Global patterns of influenza a virus in wild birds. Science 312(5772):384–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Roche B, Lebarbenchon C (2009) Water-borne transmission drives avian influenza dynamics in wild birds: the case of the 2005–2006 epidemics in the Camargue area. Infect Genet Evol 9(5):800–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rohani P, Breban R, Stallknecht DE, Drake JM (2009) Environmental transmission of low pathogenicity avian influenza viruses and its implications for pathogen invasion. Proc Nat Acad Sci 106(25):10365–10369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sharp G, Kawaoka Y, Wright S, Turner B, Hinshaw V, Webster R (1993) Wild ducks are the reservoir for only a limited number of influenza a subtypes. Epidemiol Infect 110(01):161–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tomé T, de Oliveira MJ (2009) Role of noise in population dynamics cycles. Phys Rev E 79(6):061128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tuncer N, Martcheva M (2013) Modeling seasonality in avian influenza h5n1. pp 1–27Google Scholar
  35. Uhlenbeck GE, Ornstein LS (1930) On the theory of Brownian motion. Phys Rev.
  36. van der Goot J a, de Jong MC M, Koch G, Van Boven M (2003) Comparison of the transmission characteristics of low and high pathogenicity avian influenza A virus (H5N2). Epidemiol Infect 131(2):1003–1013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Van Kampen NG (1992) Stochastic processes in physics and chemistry, Vol. 11, 2nd edn, North- Holland Personal Library, Amsterdam.
  38. Wang RH, Jin Z, Liu QX, van de Koppel J, Alonso D (2012) A simple stochastic model with environmental transmission explains multi-year periodicity in outbreaks of avian flu. PLoS One 7(2):e28873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Webster RG, Bean WJ (1992) Evolution and ecology of influenza A viruses. Microbiol Rev 56(1):152–179Google Scholar
  40. World Health Organization (2015) Avian influenza in humans. Accessed 26 Oct 2015

Copyright information

© Society for Mathematical Biology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Barber School of Arts and SciencesUniversity of British Columbia OkanaganKelownaCanada
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations