Bulletin of Mathematical Biology

, Volume 80, Issue 4, pp 926–944 | Cite as

Using a Summer REU to Help Develop the Next Generation of Mathematical Ecologists

  • Barbara Bennie
  • Eric Alan Eager
  • James P. Peirce
  • Gregory J. Sandland
Education Article

Abstract

Understanding the complexities of environmental issues requires individuals to bring together ideas and data from different disciplines, including ecology and mathematics. With funding from the national science foundation (NSF), scientists from the University of Wisconsin-La Crosse and the US geological survey held a research experience for undergraduates (REU) program in the summer of 2016. The goals of the program were to expose students to open problems in the area of mathematical ecology, motivate students to pursue STEM-related positions, and to prepare students for research within interdisciplinary, collaborative settings. Based on backgrounds and interests, eight students were selected to participate in one of two research projects: wind energy and wildlife conservation or the establishment and spread of waterfowl diseases. Each research program was overseen by a mathematician and a biologist. Regardless of the research focus, the program first began with formal lectures to provide students with foundational knowledge followed by student-driven research projects. Throughout this period, student teams worked in close association with their mentors to create, parameterize and evaluate ecological models to better understand their systems of interest. Students then disseminated their results at local, regional, and international meetings and through publications (one in press and one in progress). Direct and indirect measures of student development revealed that our REU program fostered a deep appreciation for and understanding of mathematical ecology. Finally, the program allowed students to gain experiences working with individuals with different backgrounds and perspectives. Taken together, this REU program allowed us to successfully excite, motivate and prepare students for future positions in the area of mathematical biology, and because of this it can be used as a model for interdisciplinary programs at other institutions.

Keywords

Undergraduate research Mathematical ecology Epidemiology Conservation biology 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by NSF-DMS Grant #1559663, “University of Wisconsin-La Crosse REU in Mathematical Ecology”. We would like to thank Richard Erickson of the USGS for co-mentoring one of the groups, co-authoring Haider et al. (2017), and helping write this manuscript. His contributions would warrant co-authorship, but his Branch Chief requested his removal from the manuscript (J. Meinertz, USGS Information Product Data System 087458). We would also like to thank the USGS Wind Energy Impacts Assessment program for funding Dr. Ericksons contribution to this project. We would also like to thank Richard Rebarber for serving as our external reviewer, and an overall mentor to the faculty mentors in the group. Finally, we would like to thank our students, Kelly Buch, Casey Carter, Annika Fredrickson, Humza Haider, Robert Hendrickson, Rosa Moreno, Sarah Oldfield, Tiffany Tu, for the hard work and constant inspiration they provided all summer. IRB Approval Number 5-6892.

References

  1. Allen Linda JS (2010) An introduction to stochastic processes with applications to biology. CRC Press, Boca RatonMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Begon M, Bennett M, Bowers RG, French NP, Hazel SM, Turner J (2002) A clarification of transmission terms in host-microparasite models: numbers, densities and areas. Epidemiol Infect 129(1):147–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blankespoor CL, Reimink RL, Blankespoor HD (2001) Efficacy of praziquantel in treating natural schistosome infections in common mergansers. J Parasitol 87(2):424–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blankespoor HD, Reimink RL (1991) The control of swimmer’s itch in Michigan: past, present and future. Mich Acad 24(1):7–23Google Scholar
  5. Bogner FX (1998) The influence of short-term outdoor ecology education on long-term variables of environmental perspective. J Environ Educ 29(4):17–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bowen MG (2007) The practice of field ecology: insights for science education. Res Sci Educ 37(2):171–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Caswell H (2001) Matrix population models. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen JE et al (2006) Mathematics is biology’s next microscope, only better; biology is mathematics’ next physics, only better. Vinculum 43(1):3Google Scholar
  9. Cushing JM (1998) An introduction to structured population dynamics. SIAM, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  10. Diffendorfer JE, Beston JA, Merrill MD, Stanton JC, Corum MD, Loss SR, Thogmartin WE, Johnson DH, Erickson RA, Heist KW (2017) A method to assess the population-level consequences of wind energy facilities on bird and bat species. In: Wind energy and wildlife interactions, Springer, Cham, pp 65–76Google Scholar
  11. Ellison AM, Dennis B (2010) Paths to statistical fluency for ecologists. Front Ecol Environ 8(7):362–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ellner SP, Childs DZ, Rees M (2016) Data-driven modelling of structured populations. Springer, BerlinCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Erickson RA, Thogmartin WE, Russell RE, Diffendorfer JE, Szymanski JA (2014a) A stage-structured, spatially explicit migration model for myotis bats: mortality location affects system dynamics. Lett Biomath 1(2):157–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Erickson RA, Eager EA, Stanton JC, Beston JA, Diffendorfer JE, Thogmartin WE (2015) Assessing local population vulnerability with branching process models: an application to wind energy development. Ecosphere 6(12):1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Erickson RA, Thogmartin WE, Diffendorfer JE, Russell RE, Szymanski JA (2016) Effects of wind energy generation and white-nose syndrome on the viability of the indiana bat. PeerJ 4:e2830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Falkenheim J, Burke A, Muhlberger P, Hale K (2017) Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2017. special report nsf 17-3102015. National science foundation. National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, Arlington. http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd
  17. Glodosky CM, Sandland GJ (2014) Assessing host competency between native and invasive snail species exposed to the native parasite echinostoma revolutum. Aquat Invasions 9(1):87–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Haider HS, Oldfield SC, Tu T, Moreno RK, Diffendorfer JE, Eager EA, Erickson RA (2017) Incorporating Allee effects into the potential biological removal level. Nat Resour Model 30(3):1–16MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hastings A, Palmer MA (2003) A bright future for biologists and mathematicians? Science 299(5615):2003–2004MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Hethcote HW (2000) The mathematics of infectious diseases. SIAM Rev 42(4):599–653MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Horák P, Mikeš L, Lichtenbergová L, Skála V, Soldánová M, Brant SV (2015) Avian schistosomes and outbreaks of cercarial dermatitis. Clin Microbiol Rev 28(1):165–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Loken BR, Spencer CN, Granath WO Jr (1995) Prevalence and transmission of cercariae causing schistosome dermatitis in flathead lake, montana. J Parasitol 81:646–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. May RM (2004) Uses and abuses of mathematics in biology. Science 303(5659):790–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mills NJ, Getz WM (1996) Modelling the biological control of insect pests: a review of host-parasitoid models. Ecol Model 92(2–3):121–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Morris WF, Doak DF et al (2002) Quantitative conservation biology. Sinauer, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  26. Peirce JP, Sandland GJ, Bennie B, Haro RJ (2016) Modeling and analysis of a temperature-driven outbreak of waterfowl disease in the upper mississippi river. Ecol Model 320:71–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Reed MC (2015) Mathematical biology is good for mathematics. Not AMS 62(10):1172–1176MATHGoogle Scholar
  28. Reimink RL, DeGoede JA, Blankespoor HD (1995) Efficacy of praziquantel in natural populations of mallards infected with avian schistosomes. J Parasitol 81:1027–1029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Richard A, Erickson RA, Thogmartin WE, Szymanski JA (2014b) Battool: an r package with gui for assessing the effect of white-nose syndrome and other take events on myotis spp. of bats. Source Code Biol Med 9(1):9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rowell JT, Rychtář J (2015) Cooperative behaviour in theory and practice: leading undergraduate research in behaviour mathematical biology. Lett Biomath 2(1):29–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sandland GJ, Houk S, Walker B, Haro RJ, Gillis R (2013) Differential patterns of infection and life-history expression in native and invasive hosts exposed to a trematode parasite. Hydrobiologia 701(1):89–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sandland GJ, Gillis R, Haro RJ, Peirce JP (2014) Infection patterns in invasive and native snail hosts exposed to a parasite associated with waterfowl mortality in the upper mississippi river, usa. J Wildl Dis 50(1):125–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Soldánová M, Selbach C, Kalbe M, Kostadinova A, Sures B (2013) Swimmer’s itch: etiology, impact, and risk factors in europe. Trends Parasitol 29(2):65–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wade PR (1998) Calculating limits to the allowable human-caused mortality of cetaceans and pinnipeds. Mar Mamm Sci 14(1):1–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Weeks AM, De Jager NR, Haro RJ, Sandland GJ (2017) Spatial and temporal relationships between the invasive snail Bithynia tentaculata and submersed aquatic vegetation in pool 8 of the upper mississippi river. River Res Appl 33(5):729–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. White GC (2001) Why take calculus? rigor in wildlife management. Wildl SoC Bull 29:380–386Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Mathematical Biology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barbara Bennie
    • 1
  • Eric Alan Eager
    • 1
    • 2
  • James P. Peirce
    • 1
    • 2
  • Gregory J. Sandland
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Mathematics and StatisticsUniversity of Wisconsin - La CrosseLa CrosseUSA
  2. 2.River Studies CenterUniversity of Wisconsin - La CrosseLa CrosseUSA
  3. 3.Department of BiologyUniversity of Wisconsin - La CrosseLa CrosseUSA

Personalised recommendations